Reports – 10 Shirley Road

Shirley Community Facility Plan v2

1. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Agenda for 11th December 2025
2. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes for 11th December 2025
3. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes Attachments for 11th September 2025
(No Attachments were included, even though the Board received emails).
4. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
YouTube Video of the 11th December 2025 Board Meeting
(No Deputations were allowed for this Item).
5. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Written Submission by Joanna Gould
(including AI Summary of .pdf)

1. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Agenda for 11th December 2025
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/12/PCBCC_20251211_AGN_10741_AT.PDF
9. Updated Shirley Community Facility Design
– Pages 13-24: Council Staff Report
– Pages 25-31: Co-Studio Architects Developed Design for the Shirley Community Facility v2
– Pages 32-38: Co-Studio Architects Developed Design for the Shirley Community Facility v1.

2. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes for 11th December 2025
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/12/PCBCC_20251211_MIN_10741_AT.PDF
Pages 4-6
9. Updated Shirley Community Facility Design
– Community Board Consideration
The Board accepted the Officer Recommendations, except in respect of it selecting the option of having a raked ceiling for the facility, rather than a flat ceiling.
The Board also added resolution 7 below to enable the two meeting rooms in the updated facility design to be accessed independently of the function space via external doors that it requested the identified windows be replaced with.
The Board’s consideration confirmed that the authority given to staff to amend the updated design included determining whether the added doors be single or double.
Victoria Henstock foreshadowed moving the Officer Recommendations without change, but the addition of a raked ceiling, and external doors for the meeting rooms, was carried before the foreshadowed motion could be put to a vote.
– Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Updated Shirley Community Facility Design Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Approves the updated developed detail design, including a flat ceiling and associated project costings, incorporating the Board’s September 2025 directions, as shown in Attachment A to this report.
4. Instructs staff to proceed to tender and procurement following approval of the updated design and project costings.
5. Acknowledges the mahi of the Shirley Working Group and thanks them for their contribution to the project.
6. Notes that the total project remains deliverable within the Long-Term Plan budget of $3,705,000.
– Community Board Resolved PCBCC/2025/00074
Part C
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Updated Shirley Community Facility Design Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Subject to resolution 7, approves the updated developed detail design, including a raked ceiling and associated project costings, incorporating the Board’s September 2025 directions, as shown in Attachment A to the report.
4. Instructs staff to proceed to tender and procurement following approval of the updated design and project costings.
5. Acknowledges the mahi of the Shirley Working Group and thanks them for their contribution to the project.
6. Notes that the total project remains deliverable within the Long-Term Plan budget of $3,705,000.
7. Requests and authorises staff to amend the updated design by replacing:
a. the external window in Meeting Room 04; and
b. the south-western external window in Large Meeting Room 03;
with external glass doors of the same style as the other external doors in the facility, to enable those rooms to be accessed independently of the function space.
– Pauline Cotter/Jake McLellan Carried
9. Updated Shirley Community Facility Design Voting:
– For (6): Pauline Cotter, Jake McLellan, Dr Sunita Gautam, John Miller, Mike Davidson, Simon Britten
– Against (1): Emma Twaddell
– Abstain (2): Ashleigh Feary, Victoria Henstock
TOTAL = 9

3. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes Attachments for 11th September 2025
(No Attachments were included, even though the Board received emails).

4. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
YouTube Video of the 11th December 2025 Board Meeting
(No Deputations were allowed for this Item).
Presentation & Board Discussions for Item 9. Updated Shirley Community Facility Design:
https://www.youtube.com/live/RRceb032Avw?t=5691s

5. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Written Submission by Joanna Gould
.pdf: https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/WaipapaPICItem9ShirleyCommunityFacilityDec2025JoannaGould.pdf
Includes information on the following topics:
– Shirley Community Facility | Developed Design | December 2025
– Proposed Shirley Community Facility | Feedback from September 2025
– Dudley Character Area, Richmond | Dudley Design Guide
– 10 Shirley Road & Original Building | Connections
– St Albans Community Centre | Concept Plan & Consultation
– Lancaster Park Community Centre and Changing Rooms
– Department of Conservation Email | Reserve Classification & Uses
– Shirley Community Reserve | Redevelopment Concept for Discussion
– CCC Community Facilities Network Plan | Principles
– CCC Community Facilities Network Plan | Best Practice Community Facility Design
– Christchurch City Council District Plan | Housing Intensification & Property Values
– Kāinga Ora | New Social Housing Developments
– Bookable Spaces & Local Activities Provided
– Shirley Centre | Ideas by Joanna Gould (2021)

AI Summary of .pdf:
“The document outlines concerns, feedback, and suggestions regarding the proposed Shirley Community Facility redevelopment at Shirley Community Reserve, as well as comparisons to other community projects and guidelines. Below are the key points:

Concerns with the Proposed Shirley Community Facility Design (December 2025)
– Building Placement:
Located at the back of the reserve, hidden from Shirley Road, and not aligned with the existing path.
South wall blocks the line of sight from Shirley Road to Dudley Creek, raising CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) concerns.
– Design Issues:
Meeting rooms are fixed spaces, not adjustable.
Access to meeting rooms is through the function space, which may limit usability.
The projector wall removes windows on the east side, blocking visibility to the playground and Shirley Playcentre.
The building lacks windows or doors on the south side, missing the best view of Dudley Creek.
Roof pitch, entrance location, and window styles do not align with the Dudley Design Guide for the area.
– Interior Design:
The new building is a single-room facility, unlike the former multi-room community center.
No clarity on whether items from the former heritage-listed building will be incorporated.
– Car Park and Paths:
Reduced car park spaces may impact Shirley Primary School and Shirley Playcentre.
The new car park is disconnected from existing paths, affecting accessibility.
The building is not connected to Shirley Road, the playground, or Shirley Playcentre.
– Toilets and Kitchen:
Lack of windows in toilets and kitchen increases electricity and ventilation costs.
Concerns about vandalism and maintenance of public toilets.

– Feedback and Advocacy:
The facility was designed without sufficient resident input and is deemed not “fit for purpose.”
Residents prefer a community-focused facility rather than a venue for hire or clubroom.
The facility should honor the area’s history and provide inclusive spaces for current and future residents.

– Reserve Classification and Legal Implications:
The land is classified as a “Local Purpose Reserve” for a community center, which limits its use to this purpose unless the classification is changed.
Mixed-use activities are permissible if compatible with the reserve’s primary purpose.

– Comparisons to Other Community Projects:
The St Albans Community Centre involved extensive public consultation and a community-led design process, which was not followed for the Shirley Community Facility.
Lancaster Park Community Centre has a larger building size and more amenities compared to the proposed Shirley Community Facility.

– Recommendations:
Align the design with the CCC Community Facilities Network Plan principles, emphasizing community-led design, inclusivity, flexibility, and integration with surroundings.
Incorporate local history and retrieved items from the former heritage-listed building.
Improve accessibility and connectivity to surrounding paths, playgrounds, and public transport.
Address concerns about the building’s placement, design, and usability.

– Additional Context:
The Shirley Community Reserve has been underutilized since the original community center was demolished in 2012 due to earthquake damage.
The area is experiencing housing intensification, with new social housing developments expected to bring approximately 198 new residents by May 2026.
The document includes links to resources, community groups, and design guidelines for further reference.

– Conclusion:
The document emphasizes the need for a community-led, inclusive, and functional design for the Shirley Community Facility that aligns with the reserve’s purpose and addresses residents’ needs.
It highlights the importance of integrating the facility with its surroundings and honoring the area’s history while accommodating future growth.”

Shirley Community Facility Plan v1

1. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Agenda for 11th September 2025
2. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes for 11th September 2025
3. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes Attachments for 11th September 2025
4. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
YouTube Video of the 11th September 2025 Board Meeting
(including Deputations by: Jennifer Dalziel, Margaret Stewart, Joanna Gould, Don Gould, Jo Byrne, Murray James from We Are Richmond & Jane Mitchell from Shirley Community Trust).
5. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Written Submission by Joanna Gould
(including AI Summary of .pdf)

1. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Agenda for 11th September 2025:
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/09/PCBCC_20250911_AGN_9141_AT.PDF
Item 8. Shirley Community Facility
– Pages 26 – 35: Council Staff Report
– Pages 36 – 62: Co-Studio Architects Developed Design for the Shirley Community Facility.

2. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes for 11th September 2025:
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/09/PCBCC_20250911_MIN_9141_AT.PDF
Item 8. Shirley Community Facility
– Board Consideration
The Board considered the deputations on this item (refer 5.3 – 5.8 of these minutes) before accepting the Officer Recommendations with a variation on Option Two, increasing the footprint by at least 100 square metres to make the centre large enough to contain three separate or separatable meeting/activity rooms.
The Board also added requests that staff investigate including in the final design the building elements listed in resolution 6, and noted that the rotunda (or another form of shelter) will be investigated by Parks staff as part of their redevelopment proposal for the reserve.
– Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Shirley Community Facility Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the
Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Acknowledges the mahi of the Shirley Working Group and thanks them for their contribution to the project.
4. Notes the Shirley Working Group’s endorsement of the developed design for the Shirley Community Facility.
5. Approves:
a. option one, the developed design as endorsed by the Shirley Working
Group as shown in Attachment A, for inclusion in the detailed design phase and associated comprehensive project cost report.
Or;
b. option two, the developed design and extension to the building, as shown in Attachment B for inclusion in the detailed design phase and associated comprehensive project cost report.
6. Requests staff incorporate the proposed rotunda, as shown in Attachment C, for inclusion in the detailed design phase and associated comprehensive project cost report.
7. Requests staff to report back to the Board with the detailed design and comprehensive project cost report for approval.
8. Requests staff collaborate with the Parks Unit to ensure this project is integrated with the development of a landscape plan for Shirley Reserve, and to explore opportunities for delivery efficiencies.
– Community Board Resolved PCBCC/2025/00057
Part C
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Shirley Community Facility Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Acknowledges the mahi of the Shirley Working Group and thanks them for their contribution to the project.
4. Notes the Shirley Working Group’s endorsement of the developed design (as outlined in Option One and in Attachment A to this report) for the Shirley Community Facility.
5. Approves the developed design with an increase to the footprint by at least 100 square metres to make the centre large enough to contain three separate or separatable meeting/activity rooms, while remaining within budget, for inclusion in the detailed design phase and associated comprehensive project cost report.
6. Requests that staff investigate:
a. constructing the building with an internal exposed raked ceiling;
b. including solar panels and a battery;
c. including an office space;
d. including and fitting a large screen.
7. Notes that Parks staff will include investigating a shelter/rotunda as part of their redevelopment proposal.
8. Requests staff to report back to the Board with the detailed design and associated project costings for approval.
9. Requests staff collaborate with the Parks Unit to ensure this project is integrated with the development of a landscape plan for Shirley Reserve, and to explore opportunities for delivery efficiencies.
– Pauline Cotter/Sunita Gautam Carried
– Emma Norrish requested that her vote against the resolutions be recorded.

3. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes Attachments for 11th September 2025:
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/09/PCBCC_20250911_MAT_9141.PDF
– Pages 16-26: 5.5. Deputation by Joanna Gould for the Shirley Community Facility
– Pages 27-30: 5.6. Deputation by Don Gould for the Shirley Community Facility

4. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Youtube Video of the 11th September 2025 Board Meeting
– Deputations for Item 8. Shirley Community Facility:
https://www.youtube.com/live/4cCkAA7KvZg?si=xU09YWM8HoBE6ww4&t=1395s
5.3 Jennifer Dalziel
Jennifer Dalziel spoke regarding Item 8, Shirley Community Facility.
5.4 Margaret Stewart
Margaret Stewart spoke regarding Item 8, Shirley Community Facility.
5.5 Joanna Gould
Joanna Gould spoke regarding Item 8, Shirley Community Facility.
5.6 Don Gould
Don Gould spoke regarding Item 8, Shirley Community Facility.
5.7 Jo Byrne
Jo Byrne spoke regarding Item 8, Shirley Community Facility.
5.8 We Are Richmond and Shirley Community Trust
Murray James and Jane Mitchell spoke on behalf of We Are Richmond and Shirley Community Trust respectively regarding Item 8, Shirley Community Facility.
– Presentation & Board Discussions for Item 8. Shirley Community Facility:
https://www.youtube.com/live/4cCkAA7KvZg?t=6367s

5. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Written Submission by Joanna Gould
.pdf: https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/WaipapaPICItem8ShirleyCommunityFacilitySept2025JoannaGould.pdf
Includes information on the following topics:
Section A: Staff Report
Section B: Developed Design
1. Building Placement
2. Dudley Creek
3. Dudley Design
4. Interior
5. Car Park
6. Paths
7. Toilets & Kitchen
Section C: Additional Information
– Shirley Community Facility | Developed Design
– Dudley Design Guide
– Chancellor Street Heritage Houses (opposite Shirley Community Reserve)
– Heritage New Zealand Site Record & Photos of the former Shirley Community Centre building
– Shirley Community Centre – Landscape Development Proposals – May 1994
– Shirley Community Centre – 10 Shirley Road Retrievals – November 2012
– Shirley Community Centre | Ideas by Joanna Gould (2018)
– Shirley Centre | Design Considerations
– Shirley Centre | Design Inspiration
– Shirley Centre | Ideas by Joanna Gould (2021)

AI Summary of .pdf:
“The document outlines the agenda and concerns surrounding the proposed Shirley Community Facility to be constructed on Shirley Community Reserve at 10 Shirley Road. Below are the key points:

Section A: Staff Report
– Purpose of the Report: Approval of the developed design for the Shirley Community Facility.
– Timing Concerns: The report is presented at the last meeting before elections, raising concerns about fairness to the incoming board and lack of transparency in decision-making.
– Community Advocacy: Residents have been advocating for a replacement building since the original Shirley Community Centre was demolished in 2012. Progress has been slow despite its designation as a priority project.
– Working Group Issues:
The Shirley Working Group was established to advise on the design but lacked representation from key community stakeholders (e.g., Shirley Playcentre, Shirley Recreational Walkers, Shirley Primary School, and residents).
Endorsement of the design was divided, with some members opposing it.
– Budget Concerns:
The project budget is $3.7M, but the developed design is estimated at $1.6M, leaving $2.1M unallocated.
The new building is significantly smaller (236.9m²) than the original (1,500m²), raising concerns about its adequacy.
– Legal and Community Implications:
The land is classified as a “Local Purpose (Community Centre)” reserve, limiting its use.
High community interest in the project has not been adequately addressed, and residents feel excluded from the decision-making process.

Section B: Developed Design
– Building Placement:
The building is located at the back of the reserve, disconnected from Shirley Road and the existing paths.
Concerns about Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) issues due to the building’s placement and lack of visibility.
– Design Concerns:
The building design does not align with the Dudley Design Guide or the architectural style of surrounding residential buildings.
Lack of windows and doors facing Dudley Creek, which is a key feature of the reserve.
The interior design is limited to one room, reducing the facility’s functionality compared to the original multi-room building.
– Car Park and Pathway Issues:
Reduced car park spaces may impact Shirley Primary School and Shirley Playcentre.
The new building is not connected to existing paths or key areas like Shirley Road, the playground, or Shirley Playcentre.
– Toilets and Kitchen:
Lack of windows in the toilets and kitchen raises concerns about ventilation and energy costs.
The inclusion of public toilets is debated due to potential issues with vandalism and maintenance.

Section C: Additional Information
– Historical and Design Context:
The former Shirley Community Centre was a heritage-listed building with significant architectural and historical value.
The Dudley Design Guide emphasizes maintaining the character of the area, which the new design does not fully adhere to.
– Community Concerns:
Residents have expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of consultation and transparency.
There are questions about the allocation of the remaining budget and whether it will benefit other organizations that endorsed the plans.
– Key Issues Raised:
Lack of community involvement and transparency in the decision-making process.
Concerns about the adequacy of the new building’s size and design.
Questions about the allocation of the remaining budget.
Exclusion of key community stakeholders from the Working Group.
Disconnection of the new building from the reserve’s existing paths and features.

The document highlights significant community concerns about the proposed Shirley Community Facility, including its design, placement, budget allocation, and the decision-making process.”

Matatiki Hornby Centre

Did you know the Matatiki Hornby Centre is located 1km from the previous Hornby Library, the same distance from the current Shirley Library to 10 Shirley Road?

At the 13th June 2024 Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board meeting, during the discussions regarding ‘Item 9. Shirley Community Reserve: Proposed Community Facility’, the following statement was made by a Board member:
“Can’t justify the expense in moving the Shirley Library to the Shirley Community Reserve.“

• The new purpose-built Matatiki Hornby Centre is located 1km from the previous Hornby Library building at 8 Goulding Avenue.
Google Maps Distance: https://maps.app.goo.gl/EetbMHFVhVYbK1819

• The current Shirley Library is located 1km from the Shirley Community Reserve.
Google Maps Distance: https://maps.app.goo.gl/LTGd1FZQJYpUu82t8

Why is the Christchurch City Council able to invest in the residents of Hornby & not the residents living around Shirley Road in Shirley, Dallington, Richmond, Edgeware, St Albans & Mairehau?

Why didn’t the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board advocate for all their residents in the Innes/Central areas during the Christchurch City Council LTP 2024-34, for Council to approve an ‘appropriate new budget’ to build a new ‘Shirley Centre’/relocate Shirley Library & Service Centre, from the Burwood Ward to the Central Ward at 10 Shirley Road, Richmond?

https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/christchurchs-forgotten-suburb/
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/location-location-location/

In our local communities, we don’t need a pool included in a Citizen Hub like the Matatiki Hornby Centre, as there are already two pools currently being developed:
– Edgeware Pool, 43A Edgeware Road, St Albans (west of 10 Shirley Road)
https://www.edgewarepool.co.nz/
– Te Oraka Community Pools, 60 Shirley Road, Richmond (east of 10 Shirley Road)

But we do need a new Shirley Library/Citizen Hub in an accessible location, connected to our major bus routes & not in a car park, for all the residents living in the Innes/Central Wards, who are currently without access to a suburban library.

The St Albans Public Library closed on the 29th November 1997, after 130 years of service to the community.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/st-albans-libraries/

The current Shirley Library was built in 1995 & is now 30 years old.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-libraries/

Christchurch City Libraries Asset Management Plan LTP 2024
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/assets/Documents/The-Council/Plans-Strategies-Policies-Bylaws/Plans/Long-Term-Plan/ltpdraftAMP2024/Libraries-Draft-Asset-Management-Plan-LTP-2024.PDF
– 2.3 Network Age and Lifecycle Stage: ‘Libraries – Age and Replacement Cost’, Figure 2-3: Age Profile and Replacement Costs. [Page 12]
“In 2050 there will be a number of libraries passing the 50 year mark as they were built in the mid- 1990s to 2000s.
As an asset becomes aged, maintenance costs tend to increase until the useful life of the asset expires.”
This cycle ensures assets are managed cost-effectively to meet community needs, with asset information used to inform decisions about maintenance, renewal, and disposal to maintain service levels and resilience.
– 5.2 Asset Portfolio Value Breakdown, Table x-x: Asset Portfolio Value by Site (as at 1 May 2023) [Page 27]
– 5.3. Libraries Site Summary, Table x-x: Libraries Site Summary [Page 28]
– 5.4. Typical Component Life Cycles [Page 29]
Most Cycles are between 8 – 30 years.

We need Council to invest in a ‘purpose built’ Citizen Hub at 10 Shirley Road, Shirley ‘Community’ Reserve, that provides our communities (Shirley, Dallington, Richmond, Edgeware, St Albans & Mairehau) with the amenities & resources we need.

https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-centre-funding/

Matatiki Hornby Centre | Ngā Kōrero Auaha – Creative Stories
https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/library-stories/
The Kings are Hornby locals and watched Matatiki Hornby Centre being built. Now it’s like a second home.
https://vimeo.com/1106287587
“Matatiki is a place where you can find something to do.”
“We like to come to Matatiki to do everything they have on offer here.”
“Having grown up in Hornby all of my life, there’s been times when it’s been a little bit sad that not enough care and attention has been given to the local community.”
“Matatiki is like a brand new shining beacon in the area.”
– Richard
“When I think of Matatiki, I think of a place where all of us can do something…a very inclusive space.”
– Sandra

‘About Matatiki Hornby Centre’
https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/matatiki-hornby-centre/

‘Matatiki Hornby Centre – Our Māori name’
https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/matatiki-hornby-centre-our-maori-name/

‘Matatiki Hornby Centre timeline’
https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/matatiki-hornby-centre-timeline/

‘Matatiki Hornby Centre’ flickr Album by Christchurch City Libraries
Matatiki Hornby Centre is a new Hornby library, customer services, and recreation and sport centre planned for the growing south-west community.
Construction of the new centre began in November 2021 and opens 19 April 2024.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/christchurchcitylibraries/albums/72177720309893061/

‘Limitations of a brownfield site overcome to deliver long-awaited community facilities’
Matatiki Hornby Centre is a single-level community hub with a library, pool complex, activities and meeting rooms, café and customer services area.
The facility sits on a former landfill, which posed challenges for our team early in the build when the site settled more than anticipated.
https://www.naylorlove.co.nz/project/matatiki-hornby-centre/

‘A recreation facility to provide a much-needed social hub and encourage more people to get active’
A 40-year community campaign for a public swimming pool in Hornby was finally rewarded in 2019 with the decision to build a $37-million multi-use facility within Kyle Park.
The complex includes two pools, a water play area, library and community spaces along with a Council service desk.
The project aims to form a ‘hub’ for the growing population in the western part of the City with close connections to the adjacent schools and commercial centre.
The site is within a lower socio-economic area and the surrounding neighbourhood has some of the most challenging social conditions in Christchurch.
This area has one of the highest concentrations of crime in New Zealand.
For this reason, CPTED has been embedded into the design process across all phases of the project.
There’s an emphasis on creating a high-quality environment with clear sight lines and well-activated spaces will encourage a sense of community stewardship and safe use of the facility day and night.
https://www.boffamiskell.co.nz/projects/matatiki-hornby-centre

‘Full steam ahead for new Hornby community facility’ | 12 November 2020
The job of building Hornby’s new multi-use community facility is about to go out to the market.
Christchurch City Council has approved the project’s procurement plan, which means the construction can now go out to tender.
“This decision means the project is now locked into our schedule, and that everything is now full steam ahead for construction to start in early 2021. Our aim is to have the facility open towards the end of 2022,” says Mayor Lianne Dalziel.
“This is very welcome news for the community, who have been campaigning for years to have a facility like this to fill the very real gap in library and recreation services in their corner of town.
This new community facility is going to be a good investment in Hornby’s future and will provide work for our local construction sector.”
The Council is investing $35.7 million into the multi-use centre to meet the needs of the growing population living in the south-west of Christchurch.
The facility will be built on the east side of Kyle Park.
An early works package will be tendered first, to get the site prepared starting in early 2021.
The main construction work will be tendered separately, and will get underway in mid 2021.
Architectural firm Warren and Mahoney developed the concept designs for the 4000 square metre Hornby Centre following discussions with the community.
https://www.newsline.ccc.govt.nz/news/story/full-steam-ahead-for-new-hornby-community-facility

‘New pool and library latest Christchurch City Council project to go over budget’ | 15 November 2022
The long-awaited $39.9 million Hornby pool, library and service centre is the latest city council development facing cost increases and construction delays.
Work on the 4000m² Matatiki: Hornby Centre started in November last year and was due to be finished early next year, but the completion date has now been pushed back to late 2023.
Christchurch City Council is blaming supply chain issues, Covid-19 and piling delays for the postponed opening.
The facility, at Kyle Park on Waterloo Rd, is also likely to cost more than its $39.9m price tag, which has already previously increased from the original $34m budget.
The council would not disclose exactly how much over budget the project was likely to be, due to commercial sensitivity.
However, comments made at a recent council meeting made it clear there were problems with the cost.
In response to questioning by councillor Yani Johanson, council citizens and community general manager Mary Richardson admitted there were cost escalations, partly due to groundwork and design.
Johanson said he was concerned the council had already put additional money into the project when others had been tweaked to ensure they stayed within budget.
When asked this week how much over budget the project was likely to be and where the money to cover it would come from, Nigel Cox, the council’s sports, recreation and events head, said the information was commercially sensitive and would not be released.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/130475969/new-pool-and-library-latest-christchurch-city-council-project-to-go-over-budget

‘Council still refuses to release actual cost to build new Hornby pool and library’ | 8 November 2023
The 4000m² facility was originally expected to open earlier this year, but was pushed out to early next year due to supply chain issues, Covid-19 and piling delays.
The cost has also increased from the original $34m budget, to about $46.9m.
The council has refused to publicly release the actual cost to build the facility, citing commercial sensitivity.
It decided behind closed doors in November last year to increase the budget, but would not say by how much.
However, two days later the $46.9m was mistakenly released on page 240 of a 494-page meeting agenda.
The council said at the time, the figure was not “quite correct” and should not have been included in the agenda.
When asked this week what the final figure was, council head of recreation, sports and events Nigel Cox reiterated the $46.9m was “not quite correct”.
He said the figure would be publicly released once there was no longer commercial sensitivity around the budget.
https://www.thepress.co.nz/nz-news/350105833/council-still-refuses-release-actual-cost-build-new-hornby-pool-and-library

‘Christchurch’s newest library to include creative space’ | 27 November 2023
The new library being built at Matatiki Hornby Centre will include a bookable recording space, editing equipment and other creative resources.
Hornby Library is relocating from Goulding Avenue to the new centre, which is currently under construction in Kyle Park.
Christchurch City Council Head of Libraries Carolyn Robertson says the Auahatanga Creative Space is an exciting addition.
“Similar resources at Tūranga, Central Library, South Library and Te Hāpua: Halswell Centre have all been really popular, so it’s great to be adding another location to the Christchurch Libraries network.”
The Audio/Video space will be equipped with professional-grade video, sound and image editing software, and hardware including microphones, sound mixing boards and computers.
“People will also be able to sign up for classes to learn their way around the software, hardware and other equipment so they are qualified to work directly with the technology available.
“If you’ve ever wanted to start a podcast, record a song or learn to make beautiful graphics, this is a great, affordable and accessible place to start or take your skills to the next level,” says Ms Robertson.
Katie Beer, Head of Music at Hornby High School, says students being able to access recording technology in their own community will be “epic”.
“Hornby High School has some wonderfully talented musicians. We do not, however, have any digital or recording equipment,” says Ms Beer.
NCEA Music students are required to create and record music to submit for assessment.
“We do this at a basic level, using student devices. It is not great quality recording, and also does not give students a real experience of recording music. Having a studio over the road will mean we can build recording time into our curriculum,” says Ms Beer.
The Auahatanga Creative Space at Matatiki Hornby Centre will also be equipped with a laser cutter, 3D printer, sewing machines and overlocker, heat press, embroidery machine, and other resources.
https://www.newsline.ccc.govt.nz/news/story/christchurchs-newest-library-to-include-creative-space

‘Date set for Matatiki Hornby Centre opening’ | 23 February 2024
City Council head of libraries and information Carolyn Robertson said the Hornby Library team is gearing up for the big move from Goulding Ave.
The Goulding Ave library will close on Thursday, March 28, for the shift.
Hornby city councillor Mark Peters said the opening will be “a landmark day for Hornby”.
“I’m really looking forward to seeing the Hornby and southwest Christchurch communities having ready access to this fabulous indoor aquatic centre, customer services hub, and a great, modern library.”
The Matatiki Hornby Centre pool complex also includes a lane pool, learn-to-swim pool, family spa pool, and toddlers’ wet play area.
It also has the Auahatanga Creative Space, which includes resources like a laser cutter, 3D printer, audio/visual recording equipment, and sewing machines.
The library will have 12 public computers.
The 4000m2 site includes a café, bookable meeting rooms and outdoor courtyard.
https://www.odt.co.nz/star-news/star-christchurch/date-set-matatiki-hornby-centre-opening

‘Grand opening for Matatiki Hornby Centre’ | 15 April 2024
Christchurch’s newest pool and library is opening on Friday, April 19, at Kyle Park in Hornby.
Serving the greater Hornby area, the Christchurch City Council-operated community facility, Matatiki, includes indoor pools, a library, customer service desk, cafe, and courtyard area with a stage and outdoor seating.
Located at 25 Smarts Rd, the site is a short walk from the Hub Hornby and Hornby High School.
“The centre is going to be absolutely amazing for the community in Hornby and surrounding areas,” says council head of recreation, sports and events Nigel Cox.
“With multiple amenities in one location, Matatiki will be a one-stop shop. Drop the kids off at their swimming lessons, register the dog, pick up a new library book, and grab yourself a snack at the café all in one visit.”
The new Hornby Library, which has shifted from its previous home on Goulding Ave, includes a creative activities space, 12 public computers, printing and photocopying facilities, as well as free wifi internet access.
Acting head of Christchurch libraries and information Erica Rankin says the creative resources on offer open up possibilities for people to try something new.
“Matatiki has an audio/video space equipped with professional-grade video, sound and image editing software, and hardware including microphones, sound mixing boards and computers. People will also be able to sign up for classes to learn their way around the software, so they are qualified to work directly with the technology available,” says Rankin.
There is also a laser cutter, 3D printer, sewing machines and overlocker, heat press, embroidery machine, and other resources.
https://www.odt.co.nz/star-news/star-sponsored-content/grand-opening-matatiki-hornby-centre

’13. Matatiki Hornby Centre Close-out’ Report | 27 August 2025
Christchurch City Council Finance and Performance Committee
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/08/FPCO_20250827_AGN_8625_AT_WEB.htm

– 3.1 In 2017, the Council approved a combined ‘co-located’ configuration for the Hornby Library, Customer Services Hub, and Leisure Centre. The co-location of facilities provided opportunity for integrated services. This provided the basis for the development of the Matatiki Hornby Centre.

– 3.2 The Project Team consulted and worked closely with the community and the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board, along with Council’s Libraries, Customer Services, and Recreation Sport and Events units to develop the scope and core functional requirements of the project.

– 3.3 The location and scope were confirmed by the Council in September 2019, with the concept design and updated cost estimate approved by the Council in October 2020. Additional budget for a hydrotherapy pool was agreed to by the Council in January 2022 which included a commitment from the community to fundraise for its inclusion. Further cost escalations were discussed with the Council in a public-excluded meeting in November 2022.

– 3.4 In August 2022, the Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board accepted the name Matatiki, which was gifted, along with a narrative, by Ngāi Tūāhuriri for the facility. The cultural artwork incorporated in the facility design was done through Matapopere, who were engaged in December 2020, and again in November 2021 and February 2022.

https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/08/FPCO_20250827_AGN_8625_AT.PDF

– Background [Page 361]
Due to population growth, planning for both a new library and new leisure facilities (including swimming pools) for the south-west area of Christchurch commenced in the 2000’s…
A building including a library, service centre, and leisure facilities was therefore
required in the south area of Christchurch.
Council made a commitment to make its facilities accessible for its residents, however at that time, this strategic objective was not being satisfied for a significant number of residents within the Hornby / Southwest Christchurch community.
As such, a decision was made to construct an integrated Library, Customer Services Hub and Leisure Centre within the area.

– Plans and Strategies [Page 361]
The ‘Libraries 2025 Facilities Plan’ was a framework to guide the future development of the Christchurch City Libraries network through to 2025.
The Plan noted the need for a new modern community facility in Hornby and the opportunities for co-location of facilities.
Council’s ‘Citizen Hub Strategy 2015’ outlined a shift to integrated service delivery arrangements whereby Council’s services are grouped together in convenient locations for citizens to access.
In 2017, the Council approved a combined ‘co-located’ configuration for the Hornby Library, Customer Services, and South West Leisure Centre.
The co-location of facilities provided opportunity for integrated services. This provided the basis for the development of the Matatiki Hornby Centre.

– Project Benefits and Community Outcomes [Page 363]
a) Objective: To provide a Library and recreation and sport centre that meets the identified local needs of the Southwest community.
a) Comments: The success and high patronage of this building demonstrates that the community needs have been met.
b) Objective: Reduced barriers to participation in aquatic, learning and civic activities.
b) Comments: The facility has been designed to be welcoming of all members of the community of varying ages, background, ethnicities and physical ableness.
Programmes and classes have also been curated to build on reducing these barriers.
c) Objective: Allow opportunities to be with others through provisions of safe, inclusion, welcoming and inspiring spaces.
c) Comments: As with reducing barriers, the building has been curated to be approachable and welcoming. The spaces and programmes included within enhance opportunities for human connection, whether this is bonding over the creation of 3D printed items, through a knitting class or participating in an aqua fitness class.
d) Objective: Providing equal access to multi-purpose spaces that offer learning, relaxation and creative opportunities.
d) Comments: The facility includes a creative room, meeting rooms, AV spaces and pool facilities to all.

– Lessons Learned [Page 367]
A lessons learned process was completed in June 2024 with key feedback to be implemented in future establishment projects.
A survey was completed for all team members who had been involved in the planning, development and opening of the centre. The responses were compiled and group sessions facilitated to dig deeper into how we could do things better in the future.
• Item 2. ‘Fit out’ Workstream: Increase consultation with frontline staff during the decision-making process and then update them on decisions that will impact their role. Avoid assuming staff have already provided input; actively circulate information to ensure everyone is informed.
• Item 3. ‘Fit out’ Workstream: Encourage teams to identify storage needs early on, this should inform a comprehensive storage plan. Determine where storage units will be fixed to walls and consider restraints for seismic safety.
• Item 4. ‘Fit out’ Workstream: Obtain visuals or 3D walkthroughs from architects to help operational teams understand the layout and usage of each room.
Recognize that not everyone can read architectural plans, and more information may be required.

– Lessons Learned [Page 368]
• Item 6. ‘Fit out’ Workstream: Have a contingency budget for additional equipment, especially for larger rooms that can be utilized in different ways. Allow for last-minute walkthroughs to assess spaces and order additional equipment if needed.
• Item 7. ‘Fit out’ Workstream: Consider window treatments earlier in the process to avoid last-minute decisions. Address concerns about frosting size; communication with artists should be clear. Evaluate how these may impact other teams and ensure effective communication about decisions.
• Item 11. ‘Operations’ Workstream: Create a centralized location on the Hub for all facility documents, SOPs and training info.
• Item 12. ‘Activations & Community Engagement’ Workstream: Implement regular check-ins with mana whenua to maintain a consistent relationship. Assign a dedicated contact person to facilitate communication.
• Item 13. ‘Activations & Community Engagement’ Workstream: Develop a way to accurately track stakeholder engagement and the conversations being had across the unit. One way to do this could be to hold monthly meetings to discuss who is engaging with the community.
• Item 14. ‘Activations & Community Engagement’ Workstream: Provide clear information about what the facility space entails. Many community members may not be aware of new concepts, such as the Creative space.
• Item 15. ‘Activations & Community Engagement’ Workstream: Be proud and confident in the services offered. Extensively advertise them from the outset. To do this, staff will need information on activations as early as possible.
• Item 16. ‘Activations & Community Engagement’ Workstream: Continue promoting services even after the facility opens. Utilize digital signage near the facility.

– Lessons Learned [Page 369]
• Item 17. ‘Activations & Community Engagement’ Workstream: Consider forming a community working party. This group would bring together leaders from different community areas to hear about the project and provide input.
• Item 19. ‘IT’ Workstream: Set up systems early to provide training and build staff confidence. Ensure that emergency response systems are thoroughly tested before facility opening.
• Item 20. ‘IT’ Workstream: Consult staff who understand service delivery needs in the planning process. Ensure that data aligns with current and future requirements.
• Item 21. ‘IT’ Workstream: Enhance communication with the IT Team. Understand decision-making processes and communicate changes effectively. Part of this is clarifying roles and responsibilities for IT installation—whether handled by internal IT or external contractors.
• Item 22. ‘IT’ Workstream: Involve the IT team from project inception. Encourage ownership of tasks and alignment with project goals. Encourage their participation in the wider commissioning plan so that there is wider understanding across areas.
• Item 24. ‘Marketing & Communications’ Workstream: Invest time and resources in educating both staff and the public about the cultural narrative of the facility. Share stories behind room names to create a deeper connection.
• Item 25. ‘Marketing & Communications’ Workstream: Ensure the facility’s website serves as the catchall place for all information, including recruitment and notices.
• Item 26. ‘Marketing & Communications’ Workstream: Distribute content and collateral to local schools and community groups. Share information about the facility’s opening and activities. Create a buzz within the local community.
Try to reach a wider audience, including commercial partners.

– 6. Policy Framework Implications [Page 378 & 379]
• Strategic Alignment:
6.1 This report supports the Council’s Long Term Plan (2021 – 2031):
6.2 Communities and Citizens
6.2.1 Activity: Citizens and Customer Services
6.2.2 Activity: Libraries – Level of Service: 3.1.2.5 Maintain visits per capita of national average or better, per annum, for level 1 New Zealand public libraries
6.3 The project supports the resilient communities, liveable city, and prosperous economy community outcomes in Council’s 2020 Strategic Framework.
6.4 The project supports Council’s Citizen Hub Strategy 2015.
• Accessibility Considerations:
6.11 Matatiki: Hornby Centre is designed as an inclusive and accessible environment for all. The building exceeds the New Zealand building code requirements for accessibility.
This approach aligns with Christchurch City Council’s Equity and Access for People Policy.
6.12 During the design process, the design team included an accessibility consultant, and we formed a separate advisory group of accessibility group representatives to inform the design. The Disability Advisory Group have received several briefings on the project.

Shirley Community Centre

1. Why did the Shirley School move from the 10 Shirley Road site?
2. What were the plans for the old ‘Shirley School’ building at the time?
3. When did the ‘Shirley Community Centre’ start?
4. What facilities where added to the ‘Shirley Community Centre’?
5. When was the ‘Shirley Community Centre’ officially opened?
6. When did the ‘Shirley Community Centre’ building become a ‘Historic Place’?
7. What is the history of the ‘Shirley Community Centre’ since opening?

1. Why did the Shirley School move from the 10 Shirley Road site?

‘Shirley School to be rebuilt’, The Press, 19th March 1976
“Work is expected to start soon on the rebuilding of the Shirley School [across from the 10 Shirley Road site, at 11 Shirley Road], the Minister of Education has announced.
The school, which dates from 1915, is to be replaced for structural reasons.
Replacement accommodation will comprise an eight classroom block, two relocatable classrooms, a library-multi-purpose room, and administration accommodation.”
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19760319.2.76

2. What were the plans for the old ‘Shirley School’ building at the time?

‘Shirley Community Centre’: Letters to the Editor, The Press, 9th September 1977
“Sir, If the City Council’s reserve account has been drained to pay for the much needed Centennial Park project, where does the Shirley Community Centre and Adventureland Park project now stand?
The council, at a full meeting, after consideration of the community services report and others, earmarked funds to ensure that a whole community could get into gear and do their bit to ensure the old Shirley School site and buildings become a useful and working point for the community.
It is to be hoped that our funds have not also been drained while we await an agreement between the council and the Government.”
Yours, etc. G.D. Stanley, Chairman, Adventureland Community Team (Shirley).
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19770907.2.146.4

‘Shirley Community Centre’: Letters to the Editor, The Press, 19th September 1977
“Sir, In reply to G Stanley’s letter, may I say first this Citizens’ City Council has built more community centres than any other previous City Council, and the Shirley area will not be neglected.
We are waiting to acquire the old Shirley School site as soon as it can be released by the Education Department. We have been in close touch with the Minister of Lands who knows that the council is determined that this splendid site be not lost to the local community.
In the meantime a council community officer is working with local groups and the council has set aside $13,800 to help with building alterations.”
Yours, etc. P.N.G. Blaxall, Chairman, Community Services Committee, Christchurch City Council.
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19770909.2.85.2

‘Shirley community centre’, The Press, 19th September 1977
“Shirley residents are a step closer to gaining a community centre, according to the Community Centre Society. This prospect came with the Housing Corporation’s decision not to use the old Shirley School site.
“We had been notified that the Housing Corporation wanted the land.” said the society’s chairman (Mr I. Finlayson). “However, after discussions with the corporation it agreed to drop its claim to the site.”
He was assured by the Ministry that the site would be handed over to the Minister of Lands for disposal within the next few days.
It would then be possible for the Minister to consider declaring the site a reserve, and leasing it to the Christchurch City Council, which would lease it to the society. “We are tremendously pleased that this progress has been made and expect that if all goes well we will have the building in use as a community centre within a very short period” Mr Finlayson said.”
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19770919.2.14

3. When did the ‘Shirley Community Centre’ start?

‘Shirley centre starts with fair’, The Press, 31st October 1977
“Government approval in principle has been given for the old Shirley Primary School to be used as a community centre.
The decision has been greeted with delight by the Shirley Community Centre Society, which has been lobbying for rights to the old school – at the corner of Shirley Road and Slater Street.
The old school site has been set aside as a reserve for community purposes, and the Christchurch City Council has been appointed officially to control and manage it.
The Minister of Lands had said this will allow the land and buildings on the site to be available as a community centre, and the council to delegate day-to-day management to the society. The council would assume control of the school site immediately.
Several local organisations have said they will use the old school buildings, and a skateboard area and adventure playground are planned already. The secretary of the society said her group was delighted with the decision.
It would give the area a focal point, and would be much appreciated by the locals.
The City Council has promised $13,800 towards the community centre – on the condition that the society raises $5250.
The combined funds will go towards structural improvements, heating, a ramp for wheelchairs, rewiring and general alterations. To raise its share of this money, the society will hold a fair today at the old school.”
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19771031.2.56

4. What facilities where added to the ‘Shirley Community Centre’?

‘Need seen for creche’, The Press, 10th February 1978
“The Shirley Community Centre may soon have creche facilities for working parents and those attending activities at the centre.
The centre’s committee is now trying to assess demand for such facilities.
The secretary said it was hoped that the creche would run during the mornings and afternoons. Three hours would be the maximum time in each period for a child…the committee felt that there was a need for child care facilities for parents attending the centre as well as for parttime working parents.
The creche might also cater for parents wanting to attend appointments and for school holiday care.”
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19780210.2.107

5. When was the ‘Shirley Community Centre’ officially opened?

‘Shirley centre to be opened’, The Press, 31st October 1978
“The Shirley Community Centre will be officially opened by the Mayor (H. G. Hay).
The centre, on the corner of Slater Street, Shirley Road and Chancellor Street, has been the venue for various social and cultural activities for about a year, but has not been officially opened.
A community fair will be held at the centre, and Mr Hay will perform the opening ceremony.”
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19781031.2.30

‘Centres “good investment”’, The Press, 8th November 1978
The opening of the Shirley Community Centre represented another milestone in the Christchurch City Council’s policy to provide strategically sited centres throughout the city, said the Mayor of Christchurch (H.G. Hay) at the opening of the centre.
It was not long since centres were opened in Aranui, Hoon Hay, and Sydenham and, during the last few years, the Council had spent a considerable amount of ratepayers’ money in this field, said Mr Hay.
“But I believe we are receiving a good return on our capital investment in terms of the variety of uses to which these centres are being put.” he said.
The Shirley Community Centre had been a good example of co-operation at “grass roots” level, the council responding to a strong local citizens’ move and genuine desire to provide a community amenity.
The buildings for the centre had been school buildings: Mr Hay said that he hoped the former Bromley School site could soon be vested in the City Council and re-established like the Shirley centre as a community centre for a developing residential area.
The council was waiting for Government approval for the old Bromley School to be handed over to it. “I hope that preoccupation with election campaigning does not unduly delay the appropriate Ministerial consent,” said Mr Hay.”
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19781108.2.75

6. When did the ‘Shirley Community Centre’ building become a ‘Historic Place’?

Heritage New Zealand’s Register of Historic Places
Shirley Community Centre (Former Shirley Primary School).
Register Number: 7117. Registration Type: Historic Place Category 2.
This historic place was registered under the Historic Places Act 1980, on the 17th December 1993.
“With its hipped roof and symmetry, the overall flavour of this school building is Georgian. Its U-shaped plan, and large and regular fenestration, together hint at the Jacobean influence which was to be developed in Penlington’s later work.
In addition, it provides evidence of Penlington’s skill in polychromatic brick construction.”
https://quakestudies.canterbury.ac.nz/store/object/111836

7. What is the history of the ‘Shirley Community Centre’ since opening?

‘Community Centre ideal venue for groups, clubs’
Christchurch City Council Community Plan, Shirley/Papanui 2002 Edition
“The Shirley Community Centre is located in a park like setting on the corner of Shirley Rd and Slater St and has excellent, well-lit parking and disabled access.
If you want to hire out a room (there is also a hall with a small stage!) for educational, cultural or recreational activities, give the Centre Co-ordinator a call, or come into the Centre Monday-Friday 9.30am-12.30pm.
A Brief History:
Shirley Community Centre was originally opened as Shirley Primary School in 1916.
Falling roles and high building maintenance cost resulted in Shirley Primary School moving to its present site across the road.
In May 1977 the building and site became surplus to Ministry of Education requirements.
In October 1977 Christchurch City Council was appointed to control and manage the site pursuant to the Lands and Domains Act 1953.
The site was set aside for use as a Community Centre and the running of the Centre was handed over to the Shirley Community Centre Society, which had been established earlier in the year to lobby for the building to be used as a Community facility.
The centre opened for hire in March 1978.
Over the next almost 25 years funding from the City Council, fundraising and volunteer work from members of the Society and the local community have restored this building to a pleasant, well appointed Community Centre the local community can be proud of. It is well used by both local and citywide community groups, clubs and some commercial ventures, and is largely self-funding.
Groups use the centre for activities such as meetings, art, pottery, yoga, karate, aerobics and exercise classes, spinning, lace making, computer tuition, latin dancing, bridge, parenting and antenatal classes, first aid, walking groups and social clubs.
In addition the centre leases space on an ongoing basis to Seniornet Canterbury, Christchurch Parent Centre, the Shirley Pottery Group, NZ Society of Genealogists (Canterbury) and Santa’s Workshop.”
http://archived.ccc.govt.nz/Council/CommunityPlans/Shirley-Papanui/2001/CommunityCentreIdealVenueForGroupsClubs.asp

“The previous community facility played a crucial role in enhancing community well-being.
A range of activities were lost when the community facility at 10 Shirley Road was removed post-earthquake.
A number of these groups have since been re-established in other locations:
– Senior Net (moved to Westminster Street)
– New Zealand Society of Genealogists (moved to Parklands Community Centre)
– Pottery (disbanded)
– Parent Centre (moved to Bishopdale, now at The Village @ Papanui)
– Santa Workshop (now at Shirley Intermediate)
– Canterbury Embroiders (to Hammersley Park)
– Shirley Recreational Walkers (meet on Chancellor Street)
– Shirley Leisure Group (finished up because no suitable building in the area on a main bus route)”
https://letstalk.ccc.govt.nz/SCR/SCRHistory

13.3 Appendix 3. Open Strategies – Past Users Shirley Community Centre
Celebration of the past:
1. There were weekly leisure clubs for the elderly, who attended for friendship, companionship and exercise.
The fact that the centre was ‘local’ made it easier for them to attend.
2. There were antenatal classes which were popular and had waiting lists.
As well as residents learning during the classes, they often built enduring relationships with others.
3. There were opportunities for babies to enjoy music.
4. Rooms were a great size for mothers learning together.
5. All classes were packed with people due to learning and social opportunities and links were created.
6. AFS met at the building and included a sit-down meal.
7. A home school group regularly met at the building.
8. A pottery group had a kiln and their own space in the building.
9. Genealogy had their own room.
10. Parents centre had their own room.
11. Santa’s workshop had their own space.
12. A fly fishing club met there.
13. A knitters club met there.
14. The Centre was used by Senior Net.
15. Rooms had a little stage.
16. A toy library operated there (with its own storage facility).
17. Weight watchers ran meetings there.
18. Playcentre training was done in a classroom.
19. A church used the big space.
20. The primary school currently has no large spaces so it is hoped that the new centre will have some larger spaces (while acknowledging that the Intermediate school has a good-sized hall).
21. The old centre worked as a ‘Drop-in centre’ due to a worker being there on a part time basis in the Foyer/and other permanent groups based in the centre so the old centre felt continuously alive.
22. A Cook Island group worked out of there.
23. The centre encouraged people to meet there – building a sense of community through attending classes.
24. The group who ran the Centre dissolved recently.
25. The centre was welcoming to people and was used by local groups as well as by groups from throughout Christchurch.
26. The centre had good parking and plenty of space.
27. It had history – residents had gone to school there.
28. Groups have located to other areas could and would (probably) come to this new space eg Zumba group currently in Aranui.
29. The combination of building and green space was attractive to people so it is hoped that this combination can continue.”
2019 Feasibility Study: GLG Ltd Report, Page 44

“…the Council completed a community consultation process. The work was undertaken by Open Strategies in November 2017.
Its report provides a unique window into what local residents identified as needed in a new community facility.
It contrasted in many ways with the [Crossways] proposal then submitted to the Shirley Papanui Community Board by Crossways.” Page 7
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Shirley_Community_Centre_Feasibility_Report_and_Business_Case_August_2019.pdf

CCC Draft Annual Plan 2025-2026

1. CCC Draft AP 2025 | Written Submission by Joanna Gould
2. CCC Draft AP 2025 | Verbal Submission by Joanna Gould
3. Email/Letter to the Waipapa P-I-C Community Board (12th April 2025)
4. CCC Draft AP 2025 | Written Submission by Waipapa P-I-C Community Board
5. CCC Draft AP 2025 | Verbal Submission by Waipapa P-I-C Community Board

1. CCC Draft AP 2025 | Written Submission by Joanna Gould

2025-2026 Draft Annual Plan | Topics
– T.1. Shirley Community Reserve | Feasibility Study
– T.2. Shirley Centre | Business Case
– T.3. Emmett Street | Trees Removal

Topic 1: Shirley Community Reserve | Feasibility Study
In response to the ‘2023 Feasibility Study’ included in the Agenda for the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board’s meeting on the 13th June 2024, I have researched & written my own Feasibility Study, available here:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-centre-report/

Topic 2: Shirley Centre | Business Case
I do not agreed with the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board’s decision on the 13th June 2024, for ‘Item 9. Shirley Community Reserve: Proposed Community Facility’:
“3. Request that staff initiate the process to design an ‘on budget community building’ on Shirley Community Reserve that will enable a mixed use of the Reserve and support recreation, play and social connections.”
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2024/06/PCBCC_20240613_MIN_9127_AT.PDF Page 5-6
I have researched & written my own ‘Shirley Centre’ Business Case for the Shirley Community Reserve, available here:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-centre-report/

Topic 3: Emmett Street | Trees Removal
3.1. ‘Shirley Centre 10 Shirley Road’ Facebook Post:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1AP2bFNwGY/
“I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues.”
The Lorax by Dr. Seuss

To tell the ‘Emmett Street Trees’ story, I did some research to find out when they were planted, by whom & why their story is an important part of our local history, landscape architecture in NZ, Christchurch the ‘Garden City’ & Shirley’s identity.

Below are four parts to the ‘Emmett Street Trees’ story:
1. ‘Emmett Street Trees’ (How did we get here?)
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/emmett-street-trees/
2. ‘George Brington Malcolm‘ (Who was G.B. Malcolm?)
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/george-brington-malcolm/
3. ‘Significant Trees‘ (They were, but now they’re not?)
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/significant-trees/
4. ‘Emmett Character Area‘ (Plenty of character, but not an Area?)
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/emmett-character-area/

“Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better it’s not.”
The Lorax by Dr. Seuss
UNLESS someone…cares:
George Brington Malcolm cared & we have benefited from his vision in the Emmett Street Oak Trees & MacFarlane Park.
Christchurch City Council please care…
‘Save our Trees’…’Save our Character Area’…’Save our History’…

3.2 ‘CCC Works Notice: Emmett Street and Riselaw Street – tree removals and road closures’
https://ccc.govt.nz/transport/works-3/show/1677
What: We’re removing 22 trees in the area, due to non-compliance with the NZ Electricity (Hazards from trees) Regulations and other safety concerns. Some road closures on Emmett Street will be necessary.
Why: These trees are within the prescribed clearance distances of overhead powerlines. While various solutions allow many non-compliant trees to be retained, there are no viable solutions for these trees.
Where: Emmett Street and Riselaw Street, Shirley.
When: 7 April 2025 to 24 April 2025. Monday to Friday, 7am to 5.30pm. (weather/site condition dependent).

3.3. Emmett Street Flooding Remediation
– Has the CCC considered the ramifications of removing “19 trees on Emmett Street”?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/129394267/residents-on-floodstricken-christchurch-street-feel-forgotten–it-looked-like-lake-emmett

3.4. Emmett Street Replacement Trees
– Does the CCC consider the ‘2 for 1’ replacement tree deal enough compensation for these established significant trees?
https://ccc.govt.nz/environment/trees-and-vegetation/urbanforest

2025-2026 Draft Annual Plan | Questions
– Q. 1. When will our Rates & Development Contributions be invested back into the communities around Shirley Road?
– Q. 2. When will the CCC Equity & Inclusion Policy be applied to the communities around Shirley Road?
– Q. 3. When will Elected Members vote in favor of Capital Projects to benefit the communities around Shirley Road?

While researching I found this article from ‘The Press’ on the 5th May 1980, nearly 45 years later it is still relevant today:
“‘Funds for libraries’: The Christchurch City Council has yet to adopt the recommendation of its cultural committee to go ahead with the new Shirley library…Part of this expense is for the new central library.
It should not be forgotten that Christchurch people have been getting a central library service on the cheap because they have not had to pay for an adequate central library building for a long time past. Because the cost of books and of everything to do with presenting books to the public is going up at a staggering rate, it must be a temptation for those in charge of public money to restrict expenditure.
The central government has, after all, shown in the past that cultural expenses can be an early casualty in difficult times.
All times are difficult to some degree, and a case could always be made for standing still.
It is not the way of the Christchurch City Council to fail to consider a worth-while project just because the funds for it are hard to find.
The Shirley library comes into this class.
If the council were concerned only to shelter its ratepayers, some notable facilities would be wanting in the city today.
Vital as the new central library may be, the local suburban services must be given a high rating.
They are an essential extension of the central library’s service to readers of all kinds and it is to be hoped that the council will endorse the committee’s recommendation in the interests of a fuller service.”
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800505.2.108

2. CCC Draft AP 2025 | Verbal Submission by Joanna Gould

11.04.25 – Item 3 – Draft Annual Plan 2025/26 – Joanna Gould:
https://youtu.be/1hFy9hVBkUI
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/CCCDraftAnnualPlan2025JoannaGouldPresentation.pdf
The Shirley Community Centre was demolished in 2012 after the earthquakes.
Last year the Waipapa Community Board, after receiving the long awaited Feasibility Study, made the decision to create a ‘mixed use’ reserve & are currently designing a small building.
Since this decision, I’ve been researching & writing my own Feasibility Study & Business Case, for a new fit for purpose building that includes relocating the Shirley Library to Shirley Road.
Our communities have lost a lot since the earthquakes: our schools, our Shirley Community Centre & now our Emmett Street Trees.
My submission is simple:
“Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It’s not.” The Lorax by Dr Seuss
“What you do makes a difference, and you have to decide what kind of difference you want to make.” Jane Goodall
Your support can make a difference in the lives of those living in the communities around Shirley Road.

Question from Cashmere Ward Councillor Tim Scandrett
– Q. Sorry I thought the [Shirley] library based at the [Palms] mall was doing very well, was very successful?
– A. It is doing very well, but it’s very small. It’s only about a third of the space [36 Marshland Road building].
The rest of the space is used for office spaces for the library staff, the governance team for the other community board and it’s not adequate.
It doesn’t have a boardroom, doesn’t have meeting rooms, doesn’t have learning spaces. We’re limited in what we can actually provide for our residents there, and my feasibility study shows that it’s not what we actually need for our communities.

Question from Mayor Phil Mauger
– Q. The area [Shirley Community Reserve, 10 Shirley Road] that you’re looking to take it [Shirley Library] to, is large enough to put all that in?
– A. Yes, the Community Board have already done the site [selection] process and they’ve said that it’s got plenty of meterage to be able to provide all that.
The community centre was 1,500m2, and the building that they’re currently looking at replacing it with is 400m2, so it’s a significant decrease in size of what we had previously.

2016 Shirley Community Centre Site Selection
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2016/12/PICB_20161209_AGN_1197_AT.PDF Pages 72-73
The site at 10 Shirley Road met the following criteria including:
1. Sufficient space (9042m2) for both the community centre and necessary off-street parking plus other community activities.
2. Good access with road frontages to Chancellor Street, Slater Street and Shirley Road.
3. Appropriate zoning designation for the purpose of community facilities already in place.
4. Ownership is with the Council and is held in trust for a local purpose.
5. Community awareness of site as this was the site of the previous community centre.

Question from Deputy Mayor/Innes Ward Councillor Pauline Cotter
– Q. The reason for that is, I’m just wonder if you know that when the Board went out for consultation about what to do with that site, it was 50% of people wanted to retain it as just green space and 50% of people wanted a new centre, so what they’ve done is both…
– A. I’ve come back and done my own feasibility study and recalculated the feedback, and that data is incorrect. If you look at the information that I provided in Excel spreadsheets, the numbers are not right.
The second consultation includes information and votes from an event that was on the 6th of July, and the [consultation] submissions didn’t open until I think the 12th [17th] of July, so they shouldn’t have been included in my opinion.
– Q. You probably need to, because the community board has now embarked on the process, set up a working group and everything, to follow that decision they made to do 50% green space 50% centre, which means the centre will be smaller than the old one, you probably need to take that back through to the community board if you’re disputing the data.”
– A. Yes, I can do that.

3. Email/Letter to the Waipapa P-I-C Community Board (12th April 2025)

To: Emma Pavey, Mark Saunders & Elected Board Members
Subject: Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board Update 2025 | Joanna Gould
Yesterday during my verbal submission for the CCC Draft Annual Plan, Councillor Pauline Cotter requested I provide an update to the Board, regarding my comments that the feedback data analysis for the Shirley Community Reserve consultations was incorrect.
Attached is a .pdf for the Board to review.
The first page is my written submission for the CCC Draft Annual Plan.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/WaipapaPICcbUpdateApril2025JoannaGould.pdf
I’m currently researching & writing my ‘Shirley Community Reserve Feasibility Study’ & ‘Shirley Centre Business Case’, available here:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-centre-report/

– I have not received any acknowledgement or response from the Board re my email/letter.
– My email/letter was not included in the Board’s meeting agenda for the 15th May 2025 under Item 7. Correspondence, as an attachment.
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/05/PCBCC_20250515_AGN_9137_AT.PDF

4. CCC Draft AP 2025 | Written Submission by Waipapa P-I-C Community Board

3.1. Draft Annual Plan 2025/26
A – Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board: Presentation, Page 9
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/04/CAPL_20250403_MAT_10570.PDF
“Making community friendly spaces.
– Retain the current funding for: Shirley Community Reserve.
– Libraries are also vital as in high density environments.”

5. CCC Draft AP 2025 | Verbal Submission by Waipapa P-I-C Community Board

03.04.25 – Item 3 – Draft Annual Plan 2025/26
Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CILQG3LE9JA&t=395s
– “It also is to be noted that our Council and Community facilities serve an important role in creating and fostering a sense of community.
– Libraries are key places for people to engage with the Council’s work, as well as to access the services that libraries offer.
– These facilities are increasingly important as high density housing continues to develop around key activity centres.”

– Q. 1. If this is the case, why has the Board not advocated for a new local suburban library for residents in the Innes/Central Ward, who do not have access to one?

– Q. 2. Why didn’t the Board support & advocate for the 1,200+ residents who signed the ‘Where is our Community Centre?’ petition?

– Q. 3. When residents from the suburbs around Shirley Road created the ‘Shirley Road Central Inc’ group, advocating for a new fit for purpose library at the Shirley Community Reserve, why did the Board not engage with & support this group?

– Q. 4. When the opportunity to ‘incorporate the Shirley Library’ into the proposed facility for the Shirley Community Reserve, why did the Board not advocate for this?