Shirley Libraries

Did you know when the Council was considering the location for the 1st Shirley Library, the former ‘Shirley School’ building at 10 Shirley Road was an option?


1. Library for Shirley Discussions
2. Shirley Mobile Library Service | Shirley Shops Car Park
3. 1st Shirley Library (1981 – 1996) | Supermarket Car Park
4. 2nd Shirley Library (1996 – Present) | The Palms Car Park
5. 3rd Shirley Library? | Shirley ‘Community’ Reserve?


1. Library for Shirley Discussions

“The City Council’s plans for the expansion of the St Albans Library on property at the back of the present premises were mentioned briefly at the annual meeting of the library last evening…
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/st-albans-libraries/
A request for the establishment of a library in the Shirley district has been received from residents…the council had asked the advice of library authorities on the desirability of building a library there.
The whole question of suburban libraries and the council’s subsidy policy would come under review when the plans for modernising the central library had been carried out.”
Press, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 26168, 19 July 1950, Page 3
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19500719.2.17

‘Suburban Libraries’: “…the proposed establishment of a library at Shirley was being viewed very sympathetically by the Christchurch City Council…”
Press, Volume XCIX, Issue 29161, 23 March 1960, Page 8
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19600323.2.65

‘Library Service: Priority For Suburbs’: “A mobile library was one means of providing service in the suburbs, and the council might wish to consider provision of a “bookmobile” rather than to continue to build new libraries.
The “bookmobile” was particularly suited to serving outer areas…”
Press, Volume CV, Issue 31062, 18 May 1966, Page 25
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19660518.2.240

‘Report Critical Of Library Services’: “Because of the uneven development of suburban libraries the city had a cluster of far too densely situated units in the southern suburbs, leaving large areas to the east and north unserved.
Several larger, strategically located district branches supplemented by several smaller neighbourhood service points would fit in well with the Christchurch Development Plan envisaging five district centres and 17 local centres…
Of unserved districts…Richmond, Shirley…One bookmobile would enable service to be given Shirley, Linwood, the Merivale Post Office area, Wainoni and Bryndwr…
The provision of a bookmobile should have priority over any further capital expenditure on suburban library buildings…”
Press, Volume CIX, Issue 31969, 22 April 1969, Page 18
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19690422.2.151

‘Future Policy For Libraries Forecast’: “…there was a need for strong new satellite libraries in areas not already served…
Some of the present suburban libraries were accidents of history, having been inherited from former boroughs which had been amalgamated with the city…
Future policy on location must be considered on a metropolitan basis so that one local body did not site a new library near an existing one…”
Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32725, 30 September 1971, Page 18
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19710930.2.150

‘Letter To Editor: Libraries’: “I heartily endorse Councillor Hay’s recommendation that future policy on location of suburban libraries should be on a metropolitan basis. It is a mistake to build a major library in Bishopdale while there is talk of a properly staffed suburban library being built at Papanui. To put large amounts of public funds into a library at Bishopdale is a case of the blind leading the blind.”
Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32727, 2 October 1971, Page 16
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19711002.2.117.1

‘Changes In Mobile Libraries’: “…present demand in Sydenham was slight, and that a new library site would be hard to justify ahead of areas such as Shirley…”
Press, 2 November 1976, Page 7
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19761102.2.61.7


2. Shirley Mobile Library Service | Shirley Shops Car Park

In 1950, “A request for the establishment of a library in the Shirley district has been received from residents.”
In 1960, “the proposed establishment of a library at Shirley was being viewed very sympathetically by the Christchurch City Council.”
In 1969, “Because of the uneven development of suburban libraries the city had a cluster of far too densely situated units in the southern suburbs, leaving large areas to the east and north unserved…Of unserved districts: Richmond, Shirley…”

‘Mobile Library Early Next Year’: “A mobile library service will begin next April or May, the initial service points being Addington, Waltham, Shirley…
Supermarket parking areas were ideal service points…
The most deserving areas and stopping places, seemed to be, Shirley, corner of Marshland and Shirley Roads…”
Press, Volume CIX, Issue 32148, 18 November 1969, Page 18
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19691118.2.137

‘Reasons Given For Use Of Mobile Library’: “A mobile library, which was the quickest way of introducing library service to several areas at once, could not be regarded as a complete substitute for branch service…in reply to a correspondent, ‘Arid Aranui’:
“Would the City Librarian and the City Council say why they provide only a mobile library for the east side of the city, yet can spend money on a new library for Spreydon which already has four other libraries within a mile radius?
There is no public library between Stanmore Road and Shaw Avenue (some four miles).
Why the discrimination? Do we not all contribute as ratepayers?
Surely the best method of uplifting a city is through its library.”
Press, Volume CIX, Issue 32254, 24 March 1970, Page 14
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19700324.2.113

‘New Mobile Library Ready’: “The City Librarian said the mobile library would visit areas twice a week where there were no permanent library buildings.
As far as possible it would stop in supermarket parking areas…”
Press, Volume CX, Issue 32307, 27 May 1970, Page 1
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19700527.2.18


3. 1st Shirley Library (1981 – 1996) | Supermarket Car Park

Finally in 1976 (after waiting since 1950), “Shirley should have top priority for the Christchurch City Council’s third suburban branch library…The council’s property division is looking for a suitable building site in the Shirley/Marshland Road area.”

But the 10 Shirley Road site was ruled out as an option for the 1st Shirley Library: as “an old primary school about two blocks away, was considered unsuitable for a branch library because it was too far away from shops and set back from the street.”

This decision by Council in 1977, to not reuse the building for the 1st Shirley Library, on the 10 Shirley Road site (that would become the Shirley ‘Community’ Reserve vested in the Council) with capacity for future growth, would prove costly.

The 1st Shirley Library was built in 1980 & opened in 1981, off Golf Links Road.
Google Maps Location: https://maps.app.goo.gl/gJeqjjPXmjmUz4ZK8

“Shirley should have top priority for the Christchurch City Council’s third suburban branch library, councillors said. Linwood and Papanui would be next in line…
In 1969, the council called for a network of five or six branch libraries. So far, the Spreydon and New Brighton branches have been established.
The council’s property division is looking for a suitable building site in the Shirley/Marshland Road area.”
Press, 25 May 1976, Page 6
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19760525.2.35

‘Shirley Library Discussed’: “Although the Shirley Primary School might be used as a community centre, it would be the wrong location for an interim library service, the City Council’s cultural committee said yesterday.
Councillors said the mobile library should continue to stop in the shopping district at the intersection of Shirley and Marshland Roads.
A staff report said even a library at the community centre run by volunteers would be out of keeping with the council’s policy of shutting down inadequate services in voluntary libraries in favour of a full suburban service.”
Press, 29 March 1977, Page 6
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19770329.2.60

‘Shirley Community Centre’: “Shirley residents are a step closer to gaining a community centre, according to the Community Centre Society. This prospect came with the Housing Corporation’s decision not to use the old Shirley School site.
“We had been notified that the Housing Corporation wanted the land” said the society’s chairman “However, after discussions with the corporation it agreed to drop its claim to the site.”
He was assured by the Ministry that the site would be handed over to the Minister of Lands for disposal within the next few days…
It would then be possible for the Minister to consider declaring the site a reserve, and leasing it to the Christchurch City Council, which would lease it to the society.”
Press, 19 September 1977, Page 2
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19770919.2.14

‘Election Issues: Drainage, Streets, Parks Contentious In North Ward’: “Provision of community buildings and recreation space is also a subject uniting the views of all parties…
P. N. G. Blaxall (Citizens)…use of the Shirley School as a community centre…
D. F. Caygill (Labour)…A branch library should also be established at Shirley as the next library-building priority.
N. Dodge (Citizens)…a branch library should be built in Shirley.
S. C. Mann (Citizens)…a community centre when the local primary school building in Shirley is no longer needed.”
Press, 28 September 1977, Page 3
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19770928.2.30

‘Shirley Centre Starts With Fair’: Government approval in principle has been given for the old Shirley Primary School to be used as a community centre.
The decision has been greeted with delight by the Shirley Community Centre Society, which has been lobbying for rights to the old school – at the corner of Shirley Road and Slater Street.
The Minister of Lands had said this will allow the land and buildings on the site to be available as a community centre, and the council to delegate day-to-day management to the society.”
Press, 31 October 1977, Page 7
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19771031.2.56

‘Letter To Editor: Shirley Library’: “As reported in your council notes the Shirley District is still waiting for progress towards a permanent library. May I suggest that the council endeavors to obtain land in the shopping centre at Marshland Road-New Brighton Road where much development is taking place at present?
With the very generous parking facilities being provided by the commercial interests, only a small area of land would be required for a library site, and to the casual observer there seems to be some quite suited to the purpose.
Who knows, one of the developers may be public-spirited enough to give the land.”
Press, 1 March 1979, Page 16
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19790301.2.116.5

‘Thumbs Down For Shirley Shops’: The Christchurch City Council has blocked plans for a significant shopping centre expansion in Shirley.
Part of the Woolworths development between Marshland Road and Golf Links Road would have been in a Residential 1 zone, and car parking for the expected development has already been provided…
In the Shirley hearing, central business district interests had protested about allowing too much expansion of suburban centres at their expense.
The hearing committee said that it was not part of the council’s function to protect established businesses, but added that the city centre’s future health was a community concern.
An expanded shopping centre “would seriously detract from the amenities of the adjoining residential area,” the council said, because of increased traffic.
It would also affect the profitability of other shopping centres in Christchurch.
The district scheme would have to be altered, because the project would extend the commercial zone, and Woolworths had failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances to justify this.”
Press, 24 April 1979, Page 6
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19790424.2.53

‘Library Site Opposed’: A Christchurch City Council proposal to designate two Marshland Road houses for a future suburban branch library has been opposed by the owners of the properties.
However, the owner of one house, Mr G. C. Heazlewood has told a town planning hearing committee that he had always intended to use the site for commercial purposes, when zoning permitted that and would be willing to include room for a library in that development.
It was suggested that the matter should be delayed until after the draft district scheme review is published in December, to see whether it is proposed to change the small pocket of residential zoning next to the Shirley shopping centre to commercial zoning…
Critics of the proposed Marshland Road designation have suggested that a library could be incorporated in any future Woolworths Ltd development on land already vacant. The council, however, has declined Woolworths’ expansion proposals, an issue that will come to appeal next month…
The Shirley Community Centre, in an old primary school about two blocks away, was considered unsuitable for a branch library because it was too far away from shops and set back from the street.”
Press, 20 October 1979, Page 25
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19791020.2.181

‘Letter To Editor: Supermarket Car Park’: “I am very distressed to read in this morning’s paper that an elderly person had a fatal accident in the Shirley supermarket car park. When the development was taking place we had telephone discussions…and one of the topics was pedestrian access, as we were concerned that the elderly, children, people with prams etc., deserved protected access in the form of clearly marked footways…Considering the large number of shops, and the fact that the car park is the location of the mobile van from the Public Library, I feel that better provisions should have been made.”
Press, 23 October 1979, Page 20
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19791023.2.107.6

‘Library Plan Altered’: An altered plan for the proposed Shirley branch library might remove opposition to the proposal. Objectors at a Christchurch City Council town planning hearing yesterday indicated that they would be satisfied with a changed siting for the library and five retail shops at 24 and 26 Marshland Road.
The original plan, calling for shops in front and a library at the back, had been opposed by Woolworths (NZ) Ltd, the Canterbury Savings Bank, and a nearby resident.
Now, the applicant has agreed that the library could front on to Marshland Road.
The site now contains two houses and is zoned residential, but the council has changed that designation to allow its use for library purposes in the district scheme review. Because of the site’s size, there is room for the shops.
Construction of those shops would make the library a more economic proposition for the applicant, Mr G. C. Heazlwood.”
Press, 25 March 1980, Page 6
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800325.2.53

‘Go Ahead For Shirley Library’: The Christchurch City Council’s cultural committee has decided to recommend to the full council that it go ahead with the new Shirley library in spite of its commitment to the building cost of the central library…
The total cost of the Shirley library, which will be in leased premises in the Shirley shopping centre in Marshland Road is estimated at $86,807, made up of capital costs of $37,000 and running costs…
The cultural committee, however, reaffirmed its commitment to proceed with the library; members said that it was difficult to get such a convenient site in a commercial area and that they should not pass up the opportunity.
If the council accepts the committee’s recommendation, the new library could be ready in November this year.”
Press, 29 April 1980, Page 6
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800429.2.55

‘Funds For Libraries’: “The Christchurch City Council has yet to adopt the recommendation of its cultural committee to go ahead with the new Shirley library…
The central government has, after all, shown in the past that cultural expenses can be an early casualty in difficult times. All times are difficult to some degree, and a case could always be made for standing still…
It is not the way of the Christchurch City Council to fail to consider a worth-while project just because the funds for it are hard to find.
The Shirley library comes into this class.
If the council were concerned only to shelter its ratepayers, some notable facilities would be wanting in the city today.
Vital as the new central library may be, the local, suburban services must be given a high rating. They are an essential extension of the central library’s service to readers of all kinds and it is to be hoped that the full council will endorse the committee’s recommendation in the interests of a fuller service.”
Press, 5 May 1980, Page 18
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800505.2.108

‘Library Site Approved’: “The future Shirley branch library will probably be in Golf Links Road, but no public access to the site will be allowed from that street.
A right-of-way easement should be sought from Marshland Road to the property, the Christchurch City Council agreed last evening.
Nearby residents have objected to designation of the site on 27 Golf Links Road for library purposes because of concern that the public might use their street to approach the library.
But the council said that a ‘substantial locked gate’ should be built to enforce the access ban from that side of the future library.
The land is owned by Mr G. C. Heazlewood, who will build the library and lease it to the council.”
Press, 16 December 1980, Page 6
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19801216.2.46

‘Car-park Plan Opposed’: “A developer’s scheme to create more car-parks in the Shirley shopping centre was not justified on planning grounds…
Mr G. C. Hazelwood wants to provide 22 parking spaces in a Golf Links Road residential zone just north of the new Shirley branch library building.
That parking would be associated with his proposed commercial development at 24 and 26 Marshland Road. There is not enough room on that site for both the commercial buildings and 38 parking spaces required by the district scheme.
Mr Hazelwood said the extra car-parking and landscaping would give the library building a more open outlook and was welcomed by the Canterbury Public Library…
An existing Golf Links Road right of way would be closed to traffic.
A senior planning officer, said the new suburban library had been permitted closer than usual to a commercial boundary to allow more yard space beside the residential site, which would be used for parking under the proposal. The library building was to have acted as a buffer between commercial and residential uses.”
Press, 26 June 1981, Page 4
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19810626.2.38


Shirley Library [1st] opened in July 1981 on a site now covered by The Palms.
– As the library grew the City Council purchased two flats in Golf Links Road and leased one of them to the library to be used for storage and a staff room.
– Later a Portacom was used.
– The library was given a repaint and recarpet in 1993.
– But by 1995 a new building was underway on a different site next to the developing Palms Mall.
https://heritage.christchurchcitylibraries.com/Archives/52/Library150/Articles/ShirleyLibrary/


‘Library Service On The Cheap No Longer’: “Ratepayers would pay more for City Council library services in coming years because the city had lagged behind other centres in library spending, said the Mayor of Christchurch (Mr Hamish Hay) at the weekend when officially opening the new Shirley branch library…
The tragedy for city ratepayers, said Mr Hay, was that the library service cost was not being shared equitably by all people who used the libraries, particularly those who lived outside the City Council area…
The Shirley library is the fourth of five planned full-scale branch facilities.”
Press, 24 August 1981, Page 6
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19810824.2.52

‘Shirley Shops Win Approval’: “In a reserved decision, the tribunal has allowed an appeal by Mr G. C. Heazlewood to erect two retail shops and a bank at 24 and 26 Marshland Road and a car-park at 29 Golf Links Road, next to the Shirley Shopping Centre…
The Planning Tribunal had been told that the City Council objected to the proposal because the land at 29 Golf Links Road was zoned Residential 1, and putting a car-park on it was contrary to the zoning restrictions.
The appellant had pointed out to the tribunal that City Council officers, particularly those associated with the land purchase and the library activities, were aware of Mr Heazlewood’s proposals.
Mr Heazlewood had built a library on land adjoining No 29, and had leased this to the Christchurch City Council…”Indeed, the council’s Deputy City Librarian, supports the appellant’s proposal and has done so at all times. She considers the proposal to establish No 29 as a properly landscaped car-park is more desirable for the library than to have the site developed for residential purposes.””
Press, 12 November 1981, Page 4
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19811112.2.36

‘Local Body Candidates: Eight In North Ward Race’: “Establishment of the Shirley Library, the Richmond Neighbourhood Cottage…achievements in the North Ward during the last council term.”
Press, 21 September 1983, Page 20
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19830921.2.93

‘Christchurch City Electoral Rolls’: “Shirley Library, Golf Links Road (Shirley Supermarket car park).”
Press, 2 July 1986, Page 60
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19860702.2.203.1

‘Branches, Mobile Library’: “Besides the central library in Gloucester Street, the Canterbury Public Library runs four full-time and two part-time branches and a mobile library, and supports 11 volunteer libraries. The four full-time branches operate as extensions of the central library and are staffed by professionals…
Volunteer libraries are a legacy of the past…In the past, a system of rotating books from the central library to the volunteer libraries has provided reading material.
The Canterbury Public Library is reviewing its relationship with the volunteer libraries.”
Press, 24 June 1987, Page 21
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19870624.2.110.4

‘Extended Hours For Library’: “The Shirley library is already open from 10a.m. to noon on Saturdays but will stay open until 1p.m. The hours of the branches during the week have also changed slightly.”
Press, 24 July 1987, Page 5
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19870724.2.51

‘Christchurch City Council Raising Of Shirley Library Loan 1988’: “The purpose of the said loan is for the purchase of the Shirley Library property.
The amount of loan is $510,000. The maximum term for which the said loan or any part thereof may be borrowed shall be 25 years.”
Press, 19 October 1988, Page 48
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19881019.2.159.3

$4.5M Loans Approved’: “A loan of $510,000 for buying the Shirley Library property was also approved. The council at present leases the library building.”
Press, 23 November 1988, Page 33
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19881123.2.137

‘Local Body Candidates: Christchurch City-Burwood’: “Don Rowlands (Independent Labour): I would bring to the council six years experience as a Labour city councillor…During my term as chairman of the community services committee, I was instrumental in establishing the Shirley Library…”
Press, 2 October 1989, Page 42
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19891002.2.145

‘More Centres to Open’: “Two more services centres for Christchurch City will be opened on November 27.
Serving the Shirley-Papanui area…will be next to the library in the Shirley mall…”
Press, 31 October 1989, Page 6
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19891031.2.45


4. 2nd Shirley Library (1996 – Present) | The Palms Car Park

The 2nd Shirley Library was built in 1995 & opened in January 1996, on Marshland Road.
Google Maps Location: https://maps.app.goo.gl/EA5o9hYXdfJ33NPc6

In January 29 1996, the new library opened in a purpose-built building shared with the Christchurch City Council Shirley Service Centre.
– The building included a boardroom for the community board.
– The library publication Bookmark published information in its March 1996 issue (Page 2): “The new library, which more than doubles the previous library, features an activities room for class visits, story times, senior citizens guest speaker programmes and other activities.
The building, designed by Ian Krause Architects Ltd and built by Fletcher Construction, was provided by the developers of the new Shirley Shopping Centre – to be know as The Palms – to allow for expansion of the shopping centre and carpark over the previous library and service centre land.
The Christchurch City Council provided the fit out costs for the building.”

– “Severe damage was caused by a fire on the night of 20 April…
The damage was so bad that the building had to be completely gutted and the roof replaced, along with some of the structural beams.
The air conditioning unit, sprinkler systems, electrical systems, data cabling, walls, furniture and stock had to be completely replaced.”

“Use of the ‘St Albans [Edgeware] Public Library’ having decreased as the City Council’s library services expanded, the decision was made reluctantly to close the voluntary library on 29th November 1997…
Appropriate book stock was transferred to the Canterbury Public Library, much of it going directly to the Shirley Community Library to help replace stock lost in their disastrous fire of April 1997.”
https://christchurchcitylibraries.com/Collections/Archives/Inventories/Arch0059.pdf

– The library reopened on Saturday 31 January 1998 with extended opening hours, including Saturdays 10am-1pm.
– The layout of the library was changed with the community board’s meeting room being located to New Brighton and the kitchen and staff room moved to the east end of the building.
https://heritage.christchurchcitylibraries.com/Archives/52/Library150/Articles/ShirleyLibrary/

‘Community Board moves to New Brighton’ | 23 May 2003
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK0305/S00125/community-board-moves-to-new-brighton.htm
The Burwood/Pegasus Community Board will officially open its new boardroom in New Brighton on Monday 26 May 2003.
“The Community Board is delighted to find a home in New Brighton.
Exciting plans for the revitalisation of New Brighton are in place and the Board’s presence is a positive injection of faith in the future of the area.
A centrally located boardroom also makes the Board more accessible to Burwood/Pegasus residents and community groups.”
Community Board chairperson Don Rowlands
The Community Board vacated its boardroom at the Shirley Service Centre in August 2001 to provide additional space for the Council’s area staff.

In 2011, the Shirley Library was closed for many months after the Canterbury Earthquakes, due to its proximity to the car parking building in The Palms mall.
https://www.canterburystories.nz/collections/community/ginahubert/ccl-cs-22611

‘Brief Closure Heralds Service Boost for Shirley Library and Service Centre’ | 9 March 2020
https://www.newsline.ccc.govt.nz/news/story/draft-brief-closure-heralds-service-boost-for-shirley-library-and-service-centre
The Shirley Library and Service Centre will close this month for a six-week upgrade before reopening as an integrated community hub providing extra services.
The library and service centre – next to The Palms shopping centre – will close from Monday, 23 March to allow for a building upgrade under the Christchurch City Council’s 10-year refurbishment programme.
The update includes improved security cameras, new floor coverings, internal painting and changes to the layout.
The centre will reopen on Thursday, 30 April, with new postal and bill-paying services – along with Metro cards – available at the site.
Council Head of Libraries and Information Carolyn Robertson says the Shirley Library is an integral part of community life in the area.
“Shirley Library offers so much – from information to free internet access, and an amazing array of books and other items for all ages, along with communal spaces to support stronger community connections,” Ms Robertson says.
“However, the building is due for an upgrade to ensure that we effectively maintain those core services and improve the environment.”

‘Inspirational Libraries’ | 03 Jul 2020
https://citycareproperty.co.nz/latest-news/inspirational-libraries
Shirley Library in Christchurch has been transformed into a light, bright and modern environment for staff and the public as part of a refurbishment project undertaken by the Citycare Property Christchurch minor capital works team.
The library re-opened recently with a refreshed look – a new colour scheme, carpet, energy efficient LED lighting, new & refurbished furniture, and a more open layout.
The six-week renovation is part of Christchurch City Libraries’ 10-year refurbishment programme and the library was closed during the work.
The Council’s Manager Community Libraries Erica Rankin said the new layout was a great result with excellent quality and finishing.
Citycare Property Project Manager Tim Gaston says the collaboration between the Citycare and Council teams and sub-contractors led to a successful outcome.
Early involvement for Citycare in the planning of the renewals package meant the project flowed smoothly, he says.
As well as a more open library space, the Council’s Shirley Service Centre has been integrated into the lobby to create a user-friendly customer environment ahead of NZ Post postal and bill-paying services becoming available on July 1.

The actual floor space allocated to the Shirley Library, has decreased since the building was built (Service Centre use to be on the right side of the Entrance) & is less than half of the current building.
The Service Centre & NZ Post are now included in the Library Area (left side of the Entrance) & the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board Governance Team are also located in this building (right side of the Entrance).
Floor Plan: https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/SouthLibraryReport03.jpg


5. 3rd Shirley Library? | Shirley ‘Community’ Reserve?

From 1997 to 2011, the former school building (Council owned) at 10 Shirley Road (Shirley ‘Community’ Reserve) could have been the 1st Shirley Library (with room to grow) plus space available for the community groups (that would later use the Shirley Community Centre) to share the extra rooms.

Instead, residents had to wait until 1981 for the 1st Shirley Library to open (Council leased, but bought the building in 1998).
When “the library grew the City Council purchased two flats in Golf Links Road and leased one of them to the library to be used for storage and a staff room, later a Portacom was used…But by 1995 a new building was underway on a different site next to the developing Palms Mall.”

Back in 2018, when I suggested ‘relocating the Shirley Library’ to Shirley Road:
“Shirley resident Joanna Gould has come up with a plan to push for a new joint library, learning centre, service centre, playground and playcentre at the former community centre site. She has written a submission to the council’s LTP and created a website to detail the plans.
She says the existing library building at The Palms could be sold to the mall owners and the library should be incorporated in a new centre.
“Each day as I pass 10 Shirley Rd, it is a constant visual reminder to me and the locals/road users of Shirley Rd, that our community has been left behind, we haven’t rebuilt from the earthquakes.”
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/christchurchs-forgotten-suburb/

I thought at the time, surely someone else has already seen the potential in this site at 10 Shirley Road…
I was glad to find the newspaper article, but disappointed to see their reasons for ruling out this site as the 1st Shirley Library.
“considered unsuitable for a branch library because it was:
– too far away from shops
– set back from the street.”
Press, 20 October 1979, Page 25
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19791020.2.181

Since 2012, the Shirley ‘Community’ Reserve has been a blank slate.
– This site is no longer “too far away from shops”, now it is central to all the shopping areas in the surrounding communities of Shirley, Dallington, Richmond, Edgeware, St Albans & Mairehau.
– A new building can be located closer towards Shirley Road, with views from Chancellor & Slater Streets.

In 2016, the Shirley Community Centre Site Selection process highlighted:
“Good access with road frontages to Chancellor Street, Slater Street & Shirley Road.”
Christchurch City Council Memo, 1 December 2016, Pages 72-73
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2016/12/PICB_20161209_AGN_1197_AT.PDF

The current Shirley Library is located in The Palms Mall car park, hidden behind The Palms car parking building & barely visible from Marshland Road.

The 36 Marshland Road building does not align with the Christchurch Libraries 2025 Facilities Plan: ‘Location Preferences & Building Requirements’ [Page 10]:
https://christchurchcitylibraries.com/2025/Libraries2025FacilitiesPlan.pdf
– Proposed under the 2008 Plan: Optimise partnership and/or co-location opportunities with retail development at The Palms to relocate and upgrade the Shirley Library. [Page 4]
– Halswell, Belfast, New Brighton and Shirley suburbs are identified a key activity centres for business and community which aligns with the planning for new and retention of libraries in these areas. [Page 16]
– Participate in on-going Council/ECan planning with mall owners in Shirley, with a view to possible relocation and upgrade of this library as a suburban library. [Page 30]
– Priority driver for Shirley Library (2008):
Growth/need. Retail development impacted by growth. Opportunity for service improvement.
– Priority driver for Shirley Library (2014):
Growth/need. Supporting the projected increases in residential growth in the north east. [Page 40]

The 2021 ‘ReVision Youth Friendly Spaces: Shirley Library’ Report highlighted the issues with the current library.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-youth-audits/
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/youth-audit-shirley-library/

In the financial year 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023, Shirley Library (200 Capacity) had 353,186 visitors, the second highest after Tūranga, the city centre library.
Yet it has limited floor space, amenities & resources available for residents.

Since 1916, this location at 10 Shirley Road/Shirley ‘Community’ Reserve, has been ‘a place of learning’ within in our communities.
George Penlington’s building stood the test of time from 1915 to 2011.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/original-building/

Now in 2025, I think it would be fitting to build the 3rd Shirley Library on Shirley Road, in the Shirley ‘Community’ Reserve…not in another car park.

– St Albans Library became St Albans Community Centre:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/st-albans-libraries/

– Shirley Community Centre could become Shirley Library:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-centre-what/

St Albans Libraries

Did you know that from the “small beginning in Knightstown, the Christchurch suburban library system developed”?

“On 24 May 1867, after much discussion and preliminary canvassing, a meeting took place at Mr David Lewis’s home in Springfield Road ‘to form a Mutual Improvement Association’.
Dr Augustus Florance was elected president with Messrs William Moor, coachbuilder, and John St Quentin, painter/signwriter, vice presidents.
The secretary was to be Mr John Dixey, a carpenter,
and the librarian, Mr Charles Duggan [my ancestor], who was a painter.”
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/charles-duggan/

“The Library (on High Street, Knightstown) opened in 1867 as the St. Albans Mutual Improvement Association & Reading Room.
In its early days it was often called the Knightstown Library.”

“From 1867-1920, the Library was in Dover Street (High Street, Knightstown).
At a meeting of residents in August 6 1873, it was decided to abandon the name of Knightstown and to become simply a portion of St Albans.
…in 1875 there were five suburban libraries in Christchurch – at Papanui, Waltham, New Brighton, and two at St Albans.
By a special local act in 1893, the old Knightstown Library was transferred to the people of St Albans for the purpose of establishing a new library, so that thenceforth St Albans has had only one library.
In May 1885, the words ‘Public Library’ were added to the title to reflect the importance of this activity.
In 1894 the committee decided to rebuild the front portion of the premises. In 1901 there was a further extension of the hall.
When the St Albans Borough amalgamated with the City of Christchurch on 1 April 1903, the facility became better appreciated and the city council subsidised the running of the hall.
On 7 March 1904, Christchurch City Council changed the names of many streets in Christchurch. High Street in St Albans became Dover Street.
By 1917 the old buildings were not fit for purpose and in need of replacement. The city council offered to build a new brick building on a site in Colombo Street North.
From 1921, it moved to 1049 Colombo Street, St Albans.
On 28 May 1921, the Mayor, Dr Thacker, accompanied by other civic dignitaries, opened the new building, renamed the St Albans Public Library.
In 1985, the Library changed its name to the Edgeware Library.
By 1997, with membership falling and usage declining, time had arrived to rationalise suburban voluntary libraries, and the St Albans Public Library became one of three victims.
On 29 November 1997 the Library closed (after 130 years of service to the community), with the advent (Jan. 1998) of the Canterbury Public Library mobile library to Edgeware.
The Colombo Street site became the home of the St Albans Community Centre, which suffered earthquake damage in 2011 and was subsequently demolished and rebuilt.”


‘History of the St. Albans Public Library 1867-1967’
Dorothy Bashford’s History of the St. Albans Public Library
https://archives.canterburystories.nz/agents/corporate_entities/46
Existence: 28 October 1867 – 29 November 1997
The Library opened in 1867 as the St. Albans Mutual Improvement Association & Reading Room.
In the 1870s it became the St. Albans Mutual Improvement Association and Public Library, and in the early years of this century was referred to as the St. Albans Public Library and Mutual Improvement Association.
In its early days it was often called the Knightstown Library (Knightstown being the original name of St. Albans).
Many community groups hired the rooms for their meetings.
From 1867-1920, the Library was in Dover Street.
From 1921, it moved to 1049 Colombo Street.
In 1985, the Library changed its name to the Edgeware Library.
On 29 November 1997 the Library closed, with the advent (Jan. 1998) of the Canterbury Public Library mobile library to Edgeware.
The Colombo Street site became the home of the St Albans Community Centre, which suffered earthquake damage in 2011 and was subsequently demolished and rebuilt.


‘The Christchurch Metropolitan Library Service, 1852-1948’
Master of Arts and Honours in History Thesis by D. E. Wood, November 1950
https://heritage.christchurchcitylibraries.com/Publications/1950s/MetropolitanLibrary/PDF/CCL-70963.pdf
See Blog Post: ‘Early Suburban Libraries’
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/early-suburban-libraries/

Chapter IV: Christchurch Suburban Libraries
Knightstown & St Albans (Pages 93-96)

“On May 24, 1867 the residents of St Albans and Knightstown met at the house of Mr Tom Lewis to consider the formation of a Mutual Improvement Association.
From this small beginning the Christchurch suburban library system developed.

Hailed with enthusiasm, the scheme made rapid progress and, less than a month later, the newly formed society received the title deed of section 311 on the map of the City Surveyor, as a gift from Mr William Moor to be used as a site for a Reading Room and Library.

It should be pointed out at this stage that the library was not the objective of the Association which aimed at the mutual improvement of its members by means of classes for special studies, lectures, readings, and discussion.
A comparison with the definition of a mechanics’ institute, appearing earlier, will show very little difference.
Like its counterpart in the City, it was intended to be essentially a working-men’s organisation, the subscription being a half-crown per annum.

When the Association was formally opened on October 28, 1867, Mr Cutler declared that the Christchurch Mechanics’ Institute had been created for and not by the working-men and in that fact he saw the cause of its failure. He felt certain that the new Institute would meet with a much greater measure of success.

But disillusionment came on November 12, 1869 when the committee, in view of the unsatisfactory state of the Society’s affairs, agreed, by motion, to adopt the only alternative of handing over the deeds, books, building, and all other property to the trustees. Following this startling disclosure, the committee resigned in a body leaving a debit balance of about £10.

After a lull of just over a year, a public meeting was held in the Reading Room, on December 28, 1870 to reorganise the Society by electing new officers. It would appear from the Minute Book that a continuous existence was maintained from this date.

This is substantiated by a letter to the Editor of the ‘Times’ (July 7 1873), which expressed surprise at a proposal, brought forward at a meeting of the St Albans Wesleyan Church, to establish a library for the district in a building used for the district school, which was soon to be vacant.

The writer declared that, for six years past, St Albans had boasted a public library, in a room built by the Mutual Improvement Association, which had received two liberal grants from the Provincial Council.

On the following day (July 8 1873) J. L. Wilson, one of the promoters of the new scheme, wrote denying the existence of a public library in St Albans, declaring that the existing institution was in Knightstown.
In order to prevent confusion, it is advisable to clarify the nomenclature question now. Knightstown was merely a part of the St Albans district and the Knightstown library that was founded by the St Albans Mutual Improvement Association in 1867.

At a meeting of residents in August 6 1873, it was decided to abandon the name of Knightstown and to become simply a portion of St Albans.

When a public meeting was held to consider the establishment of a reading room and library on July 8 1873, the Chairman (Mr J. L. Wilson) said that doubtless the meeting was aware of £5000 voted by the Provincial Council to assist old and establish new reading rooms and libraries.
He felt that the Institute should take advantage of this grant, as, in his opinion, the library at Knightstown was not centrally situated.

Stating the case for the Knightstown library, the Chairman, in a letter to the newspaper about a week later (July 17 1873), declared that as far as amalgamation was concerned they would be glad to receive the promoters of the new society as members of their own association but, as the land, building, and its contents were public property, they felt that they would be doing an injustice to the inhabitants of their part of the district if they gave their sanction to removal to the schoolroom or to any other place.

A joint meeting between the committee of the two societies proved fruitless, the Knightstown people remaining adamant in their refusal to amalgamate.
Their attitude appeared to be justified by the apparent lack of interest of the St Albans people evidenced by the very small attendance at a further public meeting, and it even seemed likely that it would be difficult to raise enough money to claim a portion of the government grant. (September 18 1873)

However, by October 15, it was reported that £110 had been collected although it was remarked that an unpleasant feature was the apathy of those for whose immediate benefit the library was projected.

When the Mutual Improvement Association held its annual meeting a few days later, Mr Moor, a vice-president, remarking upon the high standard attained by the library, said that not only was it the pioneer of such institutions in country districts in the province, but it was also the best suburban library in Canterbury.
He declared that an attempt to start a rival library in another part of St Albans would only serve to excite members to renewed energy. (October 7 1873)

But the rival society continued in pursuit of its goal and, in mid-December, it was announced that a site had been acquired, plans were to be drawn, and the building commenced in the near future…” (December 20 1873)

Thus when the provincial system was abolished in 1875 there were five suburban libraries in Christchurch – at Papanui, Waltham, New Brighton, and two at St Albans. (Page 99)

In accordance with the provisions of these Acts, the first government grant of £5000 was made in 1878 and the Christchurch libraries which benefited from it were New Brighton, Papanui, St Albans, St Albans Mutual Association, and Waltham. (Page 100)

By a special local act in 1893, the old Knightstown Library was transferred to the people of St Albans for the purpose of establishing a new library, so that thenceforth St Albans has had only one library. (Page 101)

‘St. Albans Public Library Transfer Act’ 1893 Amendment (15th October 1898)
https://www.nzlii.org/nz/legis/hist_act/saplta1893aa189862v1898n9545.pdf
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/st-albans-community-centre-1867-2021/


‘St Albans Community Centre, 1867-2021’
https://www.canterburystories.nz/collections/publications/ccl-cs-94423

“The St Albans Community Centre has its origins as far back as the 1860s when a group of citizens, of what was then known as Knightstown, were already conscious of the need for cultural activity and a meeting place for such activity.

Adult education was available from the earliest days of European settlement. Mechanics’ Institutes (founded in Britain in the early 1820s as education establishments for skilled working men) were open in Auckland, Nelson and Wellington by 1842.
These offered a broad range of classes and lectures, as well as libraries and reading rooms.

The first Mechanics’ Institute in Christchurch (precursor to the Canterbury Public Library) was opened in 1859, to offer intellectual stimulation for all sectors of the community.
A separate area was set aside for the ladies.

The libraries were the most popular part of the institutes, so by the 1860s most had stopped offering courses. This led to the emergence of Mutual Improvement Societies – groups of working class men who met to improve their learning through conversation, reading and lectures. These societies epitomised the early Victorian creed of self-help.

On 24 May 1867, after much discussion and preliminary canvassing, a meeting took place at Mr David Lewis’s home in Springfield Road ‘to form a Mutual Improvement Association’.
Dr Augustus Florance was elected president with Messrs William Moor, coachbuilder, and John St Quentin, painter/signwriter, vice presidents.
The secretary was to be Mr John Dixey, a carpenter,
and the librarian, Mr Charles Duggan [my ancestor], who was a painter.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/charles-duggan/

Having formed a society, members needed a place of operations. The conveyancing of a piece of land in High Street, Knightstown, (now Dover Street, St Albans) on 18 August 1867 from William Moor to the appointed trustees, Rev John Aldred and Messrs George Gould and Charles Robert Blakiston, “gentlemen on trust”, provided a site for the proposed association building.
This parcel of land was described as “10 perches part of RS 311”.
The present address of this would be 28 Dover Street.
The site is now occupied by Dover Courts. (Page 5)

In 1873, famous Kiwi cricketer and councilman, George Dickinson, offered some land on his property, St Albans, (next to what is now Merivale village) to create a public reading room and library.
A committee was formed and they invited the Knightstown association to discuss a joint venture.

So on 9 July 1873 a special meeting was called to discuss this invitation, with lawyer and provincial councillor Mr William Wynn-Williams invited to chair. The Knightstown group was in a difficult position.
They felt that they would get no further grant from the provincial government if they declined to amalgamate, yet they disliked the proposed site in Papanui Road.

Knightstown residents also thought that the St Albans residents ‘held themselves aloof from and considered themselves superior to the locals.’
Thus the deputation from the St Albans committee was unsuccessful.
The Mutual Improvement Association remained in High Street (now called Dover Street), Knightstown. (Page 7)

The Borough of St Albans (named after George Dickinson’s property in Merivale) was proclaimed on the 18 November 1881.
Over the next few years steady progress to the building was made.

In May 1885, the words ‘Public Library’ were added to the title to reflect the importance of this activity.
In 1894 the committee decided to rebuild the front portion of the premises. In 1901 there was a further extension of the hall.

When the St Albans Borough amalgamated with the City of Christchurch on 1 April 1903, the facility became better appreciated and the city council subsidised the running of the hall.

On 7 March 1904, Christchurch City Council changed the names of many streets in Christchurch. High Street in St Albans became Dover Street and Crescent Road became North Crescent Road and then, in 1909, Trafalgar Street.

By 1917 the old buildings were not fit for purpose and in need of replacement. The city council offered to build a new brick building on a site in Colombo Street North.
The proposed site was very swampy with several springs, but the land was drained and the springs capped.

The foundation stone was laid on the site on Saturday 31 July 1920 in a ceremony conducted by the Mayor of the City, Dr Henry Thacker MP. (Page 8)

On 28 May 1921, the Mayor, Dr Thacker, accompanied by other civic dignitaries, opened the new building, renamed the St Albans Public Library.
The former library site in Dover Street became the property of the city council.

In 1930 an annex was added and in 1950 the council provided a small kitchen and other facilities.

By 1997, with membership falling and usage declining, time had arrived to rationalise suburban voluntary libraries, and the St Albans Public Library became one of three victims.

The library did not meet the criteria set by the review committee for remaining in use and closed on 29 November 1997 after 130 years of service to the community.

A group of residents lobbied the council to retain the building.
The Christchurch City Council agreed to a proposal from the St Albans Residents Association (SARA) to turn the vacant premises into the St Albans Community Resource Centre.

Following alterations to the kitchen and toilet area, and the replacement of rotten flooring, Mayor-elect, Garry Moore reopened the building as the St Albans Community Resource Centre on 18 October 1998.
Serving as a focal point for the area, it remained a living, working memorial to the foresightedness of St Albans pioneers. (Page 9)

When the centre was demolished, a time-capsule was removed from behind the foundation stone. The presence of this was recorded in press reports of the time so it provided great interest when it was recovered and, with due ceremony, opened in 2018 to reveal the contents.

Copies of both the Lyttelton Times and Christchurch Press from 1920 and a handwritten history of the Mutual Improvement Association (see Appendix, Page 15) were enclosed within a small sealed brown bottle. All were enclosed in a wooden case especially made by timber merchants Hardie & Thompson.” (Page 13)


‘St Albans [Edgeware] Public Library’
Christchurch City Libraries Archives
Date Updated: September 2005
Includes: Minutes, General Ledgers, Financial Records, Membership Lists, Accession Records, Photographs.
https://christchurchcitylibraries.com/Collections/Archives/Inventories/Arch0059.pdf
“See BASHFORD, D. History of the St Albans Public Library, 1867-1967.
[Z027.493831 BAS (NZC Research Room pamphlet)] for a summary of the history and administration of the Library.
When the History was published in 1967 the Library, though housed in a building provided by the City Council, was run and maintained by volunteers.
Use of the Library having decreased as the City Council’s library services expanded, the decision was made reluctantly to close the voluntary library on 29th November 1997. At that time no decision had been made on the future of the building, though it was later refurbished for use as a Community Centre.
Appropriate book stock was transferred to the Canterbury Public Library, much of it going directly to the Shirley Community Library to help replace stock lost in their disastrous fire of April 1997.
A sketch of the Library, and a brief history taken from Bashford, was published in The Press, 29th November 1997, Weekend section, p.13.
Although Canterbury Public Library had held some St Albans Public Library records for several years, a cleanup of the building unearthed more items.
The opportunity was therefore taken in February 1998 to integrate the new material within the previously incomplete series, with consequent renumbering.
In June 1998, a further and final deposit was made and the last items incorporated.”


‘Papers Past’ | Timeline & History
Star (Christchurch), Issue 1686, 23 July 1873, Page 3
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS18730723.2.14
‘Public Library at St Albans’
Proposed amalgamation for Knightstown & St Albans

Star (Christchurch), Issue 1892, 26 March 1874, Page 2
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS18740326.2.8
‘St Albans Library’, Plans for the library approved

Lyttelton Times, Volume LXVII, Issue 8065, 12 January 1887, Page 5
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT18870112.2.38
‘Knightstown Public Library’, Annual Meeting

Press, Volume L, Issue 8569, 24 August 1893, Page 1
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP18930824.2.2.4
‘Local Bill’, Knightstown Library Transfer of Land

Press, Volume LVI, Issue 10412, 1 August 1899, Page 8
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP18990801.2.50.6
‘For Sale by Tender’, St Albans Library in St Albans Lane

Press, Volume LVII, Issue 10831, 5 December 1900, Page 6
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19001205.2.70
‘Meeting, Entertainments’, Knightstown Library meeting (tender for building alterations & additions)

Star (Christchurch), Issue 7031, 22 February 1901, Page 1
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19010222.2.5
‘Knightstown Library’, Re-opening Entertainment
“Neither man nor woman liked to be alone, and there was just the danger that, in the absence of suitable companionship, unsuitable associated might be chosen.
But a good book was always a good companion, and had the further recommendation that one could shut it up at will and put it away, which could not be done with a companion in the flesh.
Such a library as the Knightstown was intended to afford decent, rational amusement to the reader, and as the books very greatly influenced the reader, he hoped the committee would have an eye to only the best being on the shelves.”
Mr C. Lewis, M.H.R.

Lyttelton Times, Volume CXIV, Issue 16278, 28 June 1913, Page 14
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT19130628.2.132
‘The City’s Needs. Programmes and Policies’. Views of the Councillors.
“The necessity of these libraries had been proved by the large number of subscribers. There was a proposal to borrow £3000 and it was hoped the Council would be able to build libraries in Linwood, Waltham, and Addington, and enlarge the St Albans library. Even if the Council had to borrow £5000, it must provide good libraries.”
Councillor H. D. Acland
“Councillor Loasby also emphasised the necessity for giving assistance to the suburban libraries. The committees in charge of these institutions were doing good self-sacrificing work to make the libraries a real benefit to the public, and the importance of libraries in the life of the community made it imperative that the Council should help those who had shown that they were capable of helping themselves.”
Councillor A. M. Loasby

Sun (Christchurch), Volume I, Issue 129, 7 July 1914, Page 2
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNCH19140707.2.5
‘City Council. Last Night’s Meeting.’
By-laws and Finance Committee, St Albans Public Library
Transfer of the St Albans Library property to the Council.

Sun (Christchurch), Volume V, Issue 1368, 2 July 1918, Page 2
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNCH19180702.2.8
‘News in Brief’
“The committee of the St Albans Library desires to have the existing site sold and a new one purchased in a more central position.”

Sun (Christchurch), Volume V, Issue 1376, 11 July 1918, Page 7
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNCH19180711.2.46
‘St Albans Library’
“The fiftieth annual meeting of subscribers of the St Albans Public Library and Mutual Improvement Association was held in the Library, Dover Street.”

Star (Christchurch), Issue 12586, 24 March 1919, Page 5
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19190324.2.49
‘St Albans Library’, Unveiling of the past president honours board.

Press, Volume LVI, Issue 16902, 2 August 1920, Page 3
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19200802.2.16
‘St Albans Library’, Foundation Stone of New Building.
“An historical statement engrossed on parchment, containing the above facts and names of the present officers, was placed behind the stone, together with copies of the local papers.”

Sun (Christchurch), Volume VII, Issue 2017, 2 August 1920, Page 7
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNCH19200802.2.39
‘St Albans Library’, Foundation Stone Laid.

Lyttelton Times, Volume CXVII, Issue 18476, 2 August 1920, Page 6
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT19200802.2.17
‘Town and Country’
“Dr Thacker, who was presented with the customary silver trowel when laying the foundation stone on Saturday of the new St Albans Library building, said that he often wondered what became of such souvenirs. Personally, as he was very fond of a fish diet, he would his trowel useful as a fish-knife.”

Lyttelton Times, Volume CXVII, Issue 18476, 2 August 1920, Page 10
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT19200802.2.60
‘St Albans Library’, Commemoration Stone Laid.
“A plot of land, part of rural section No. 311, situate in what is known now as Dover Street, was given by Mr W. Moor for a building, being conveyed by him to two trustees, namely, the Rev John Aldred and Mr George Gould.
The necessary buildings were forthwith erected and were duly opened to the public residing in St Albans on October 28, 1867.
Now, after a period of fifty-three years, the old premises being too small, it has become necessary to erect a more suitable building.
The building, which will be of brick, will cost about £2600 to erect.”

Star (Christchurch), Issue 16401, 15 April 1921, Page 5
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19210415.2.28
‘Municipal Elections. The City Mayoralty. Campaign Opened.’
“A Progressive Programme: The cost of the St Albans library had risen from £1500 to £2500. He [Dr Thacker, M.P. the present Mayor] had stood by St Albans, and the building was now nearing completion.
He had assisted to get a four-acre playground for the Shirley School.”

Press, Volume LVII, Issue 17141, 10 May 1921, Page 7
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19210510.2.54
‘City Council. Last Night’s Meeting’
“St Albans Library: The St Albans Public Library Association made application for possession of the new building.
The Mayor said the city engineer had reported the building was finished.
It was intended to open the library on the last Saturday of the present finish.”

Press, Volume LVII, Issue 17158, 30 May 1921, Page 4
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19210530.2.18
‘St Albans Library. Opening Ceremony.’
“The Mayor said that the foundation stone of St Albans Library was the first that he had laid.
Books were the best thing in the world, and they added greatly to the enjoyment of those who read them. The education of the people depended on the literature that they read; many confined their reading to the daily newspapers. Books tended to improve the taste of the people…
Dr Thacker urged the people of St Albans to make the library the social centre of the district.”

Star (Christchurch), Issue 17734, 2 January 1926, Page 18
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19260102.2.140
‘Shirley – St Albans Notes. The Year.’
“In making a review of the past year’s happenings in the Shirley and St Albans districts it is noted that St Albans and Shirley still maintain the honour of being the most favoured residential districts.
The new sub-division at Shirley auctioned recently demonstrated that a large number of people are anxious to settle in this favoured locality, as the prices paid were a record for a sub-division in the district.
St Albans Library: The library for the first time earned the full council subsidy, which shows that residents are appreciating the benefit of the library by becoming subscribers.”

Star (Christchurch), Issue 18770, 28 May 1929, Page 8
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19290528.2.61.3
“With a view to facilitating the working of the library, the St Albans Library Committee has applied for permission to make an entrance from the circulating room to the room in front of the building by cutting a doorway through the plaster partition.”

Star (Christchurch), Issue 19198, 11 October 1930, Page 21 (Supplement)
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19301011.2.147.25
‘Shirley – St Albans Notes.’
“St Albans Public Library: A petition, signed by afternoon subscribers, asking that the previous afternoon hours of 2.30 to 5 p.m., instead of the present hours of 2.30 to 4 p.m. be reinstated was considered.
After a general discussion it was unanimously decided to adhere to the present hours, on the grounds that the Linwood Library, with over double the subscribers of the St Albans Library, had the same hours as those now in force in the St Albans Library.
It was thought that the number who attended in the afternoons did not warrant the extra hour, and it was pointed out that all the librarians were subscribers and voluntarily gave their services free of charge, a fact of which a number of subscribers did not seem aware.”

Press, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20602, 19 July 1932, Page 14
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19320719.2.139
‘St Albans Public Library. Annual Meeting.’

Press, Volume LXXII, Issue 21843, 24 July 1936, Page 4
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19360724.2.25
‘St Albans Public Library. Annual Meeting.’

Press, Volume LXXIV, Issue 22455, 16 July 1938, Page 8
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19380716.2.35
‘Commercial Libraries. Competition with Public Institutions.’

Press, Volume LXXVII, Issue 23388, 23 July 1941, Page 4
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19410723.2.21
‘Comment of City Rates. “Increase Necessary Sometimes”.
Mayor’s address at St Albans Library’
“The difficulty is to keep the rates down, but I don’t think that is possible,” the Mayor (Mr E. H. Andrews) said last evening when speaking on City Council subsidies for suburban libraries at the annual meeting of the St Albans Library.

Press, Volume LXXXVI, Issue 26168, 19 July 1950, Page 3
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19500719.2.17
‘Library Space at St Albans. Expansion Plans Outlined.
Subscribers’ Annual Meeting Held.’
“The City Council’s plans for the expansion of the St Albans Library on property at the back of the present premises were mentioned briefly at the annual meeting of the library last evening.”
“A request for the establishment of a library in the Shirley district has been received from residents, said Cr. Sheppard, and the council had asked the advice of library authorities on the desirability of building a library there.
The whole question of suburban libraries and the council’s subsidy policy would come under review when the plans for modernising the central library had been carried out.”

Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31327, 25 March 1967, Page 22
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19670325.2.245
‘St Albans Library 100 Years Old.’
“The St Albans Public Library will hold its 100th annual meeting in its Colombo street premises on March 30…
The library was founded on May 24, 1867, when Dover street residents held a meeting to form a Mutual Improvement Association.
On October 28 that year, the original Knightstown library was opened in a small hall.
The secretary (Mrs B. A. Miles) said yesterday that the library was founded to teach people to read and write.
A constitution was drawn up which forbade ‘all loud talking, swearing or profane language, practical joking, smoking or drunkenness’ in the hall.
The City Council offered a new brick building to the library in Colombo street in 1920 and in 1921 the library was moved to its present site.
The library, the second oldest in Canterbury to the Canterbury Public Library, began with 436 books. Now there are 18,851 books and membership is 579.”

Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31333, 1 April 1967, Page 16
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19670401.2.214
‘Funds for Libraries’
“City libraries could well look to the government for financial assistance rather than rely entirely on ratepayers’ money. Councillor H. G. Hay, chairman of the City Council library committee, said at the 100th annual meeting of the St Albans library.
Suburban libraries received grants for books from the Government through the Country Library Service and it was an anomaly that the city libraries did not receive some funds.
“I notice that in the early days of this library, the then provincial government made a grant of £25 to the library. This was enlightened thinking.”
The library service in Christchurch would also have to consider the system of voluntary staffing.
While there were sufficient volunteers the system worked well, but the time was near when professional librarians would be needed to meet the needs of the libraries.
More money needed to be spent on libraries and consideration had to be given to building a new city library.”

Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31333, 1 April 1967, Page 23
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19670401.2.271
‘St Albans Library. 100th Annual Meeting.’
“The continuation of the St Albans Library had carried on the ideas of the Canterbury Association in furthering the education of the people of Christchurch, the Mayor (Mr G. Manning) said last night at the 100th annual meeting.
The ideas of the Canterbury Association were formed in England before the First Four Ships left and the libraries in the city had inherited these ideas and brought them to fruition, in education…
Mr Manning congratulated the library on its service to the community and said that the City Council had given £92,000 to the city library and the 18 suburban libraries in 1965.
Of this £26,000 had gone to the suburban libraries.”

Press, 6 February 1985, Page 5
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19850206.2.60
‘$87,500 for Linwood library fund proposed. St Albans.’
“After 118 years of issuing books, the St Albans Library will cease to exist. Instead the library will be known as the Edgeware Library.
A request to change the library’s name, to identify it with the nearby Edgeware shopping village, was approved by the committee.
Some councillors expressed reservations about changing the name of a public building after so long.
The library is the oldest volunteer library in the city.”

Press, 31 May 1985, Page 20
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19850531.2.134
‘St Albans library changes name’
“From Monday next week, a small suburban library which has served the St Albans district for the last 118 years, will add another chapter to its history.
The St Albans Public Library committee has decided to change the library’s name to Edgeware – a move to keep in line with a trend adopted by other shops and businesses in the Colombo Street and Edgeware Road shopping area.
The trend came after the last boundary change, which took Edgeware out of the St Albans electorate and postal district, and put it in Christchurch Central.
Proposals to change the name were approved by the Christchurch City Council’s cultural and public relations committee in February this year, and adopted by the library committee at its annual general meeting in March.
The committee president, Mrs Naomi Lynch, says the library is one of the few independent suburban libraries left in Christchurch.
It is run by a group of 14 voluntary librarians who, between them, have given 260 years service to the library.
The plain, unpretentious building has had little change made to it. Some remodelling inside has taken place over the years to keep it up to modern standards.
Mrs Lynch says suburban libraries serve a valuable purpose in the community – particularly to those in the area who are unable to make regular visits into the city.
“The Edgeware Library is not a very outstanding building. I’ve known people who have been in the area for years and didn’t know there was a library here,” Mrs Lynch said.
For historical purposes, the building’s facade that bears the old name will be kept. A sign will be placed in the library window of the new name.”

Press, 31 May 1985, Page 20
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19850531.2.137.1
‘Edgeware Public Library. 118 Years of Community Library Service.’
“Canterbury Public Library, Takes Pleasure in Supporting the New Edgeware Public Library (Formerly St Albans Library) and thank the citizens of Edgeware/St Albans for their support in the past, and trust continued support will be given to the Library, for this essential Public Community Service.”

Early Suburban Libraries

‘The Christchurch Metropolitan Library Service, 1852-1948’
Master of Arts and Honours in History Thesis by D. E. Wood, November 1950
https://heritage.christchurchcitylibraries.com/Publications/1950s/MetropolitanLibrary/PDF/CCL-70963.pdf

“The cultural standard of any community is reflected in its libraries and the use made of them.
In a democratic country such as this the wishes of the people are paramount and the blame must be borne by them if their libraries fail to fulfill their function.”
– Thesis by D. E. Wood, November 1950

This function has been admirably defined by the late Professor H. Laski (Professor of Political Economy at the University of London) when addressing the fifty-eighth annual conference of the Library Association of England in 1935:
“I believe that the purpose of a public library is to make accessible the heritage of culture, in the widest sense of the word, to any who may wish to take advantage of it.
The first implication, therefore, of my view is the need to view that heritage as something independent of any special attitude of mind.
We are not entitled to narrow its substance because we are Socialists or Conservatives, Christians or Freethinkers, exponents of one philosophy rather than another.
The only test we can apply to the content of a public library is the test of significance.
If the book meets that test, in the judgement of competent persons, the public is entitled to find it on the shelves of the library…
We are not justified in barring gates which lead to roads we may not happen to approve.” (Pages 7-8)

Chapter IV: Christchurch Suburban Libraries (Pages 93-127)

On May 24, 1867 the residents of St Albans and Knightstown met at the house of Mr Tom Lewis to consider the formation of a Mutual Improvement Association.
From this small beginning the Christchurch suburban library system developed. (Page 93)

On June 14, 1873 the Provincial Council made a grant of £5000 ‘for aiding in establishing new and assisting existing Public Libraries, Book Clubs, and Institutes in country districts.’ (Page 97)

Faced with the colossal task of ensuring that every district should be treated according to its merits, the Provincial Council set about dividing its grant in a workmanlike manner, laying down a definite principle for library grants.

All sites for library buildings were to be vested either in the Superintendent or trustees with the declaration that they were for the purpose of public libraries and that the books or other property would be alienated, but held for the benefit of the inhabitants of the respective districts. (Page 98)

When the final distribution figures were announced, Papanui received £100 and St Albans, Waltham, and Addington £200 each, while all four received grants of £50 for books. (Page 99)

Thus when the provincial system was abolished in 1875 there were five suburban libraries in Christchurch – at Papanui, Waltham, New Brighton, and two at St Albans. (Page 99)

Although there were a number of libraries established, especially in main centres, before 1875, their growth after that year was greatly facilitated by two Acts of the General Assembly.

The first of these, the ‘Public Libraries Powers Act’, 1875, provided that any group of people not less than ten in number, have subscribed not less than £20, could make a declaration of their intention to establish a public library or a mechanics’ institute at a place to be named in the deed.
It laid down the necessary procedure for establishing such an institution and made provision for existing libraries to become incorporated under the Act.

On its own this Act is of little significance but it was followed two years later by the ‘Public Libraries Subsidies Act’ which set aside an annual government grant to those libraries supported by either the 1869 Act or the 1875 Act.

This grant was to be apportioned among the several provincial districts according to population.

To those libraries, necessarily completely free, supported under the provisions of the former Act there was to be payable a sum equal to that raised under the library rate, while the amount received by those supported under the latter Act was in the discretion of the Education Boards.

Admission to all libraries established or supported under this Act of 1877 was to be open to the public free of charge, provided that only those persons contributing at least five shillings a year should be entitled to take books out of any such library.
Under this system it became customary to open a small reading room to the public while the remainder of the library was run on a subscription basis.

These three acts of 1869, 1875, and 1877 set the pattern of New Zealand library growth.

In accordance with the provisions of these Acts, the first government grant of £5000 was made in 1878 and the Christchurch libraries which benefited from it were New Brighton, Papanui, St Albans, St Albans Mutual Association, and Waltham. (Page 100)

When the Canterbury settlement completed its first fifty years, there were still only five suburban libraries – but not the original five.

By a special local act in 1893, the old Knightstown Library was transferred to the people of St Albans for the purpose of establishing a new library, so that thenceforth St Albans has had only one library. (Page 101)

Thus by 1922 the City Council was subsidising libraries at Addington, Linwood, St Albans, Sydenham, Waltham and Woolston, in addition to carrying out building renovations and alterations when required.

In fact, in 1922, a completely new library building was erected in St Albans on the sole condition that the building and books were to be insured by the Council, the premiums being paid by the Library. (Page 104)

In 1935, besides subsidies to ten suburban libraries the Council financed alterations and repairs at Sydenham, St Albans, Waltham, Linwood, and Beckenham. (Page 106)

It seems pertinent to ask whether the City Council considered that the service provided by the suburban libraries was equal to that provided by, or which ought to have been provided by, the central public library.

No matter what the Council thought, it is obvious that in comparison to other centres, the amount devoted to the library system each year was entirely inadequate. However, as the Council considered the suburban libraries worth over £20,000 of public money in the period from 1925 to 1945, it is imperative that we discover the real value of the service being rendered.

With the exception of Woolston, each library is maintained and services entirely by volunteer labour, each having, on an average, seventeen librarians of whom approximately fifty per cent are women.

All but Redcliffs and Woolston are open six days a week for an average of an hour and twenty minutes each day, although some of them are open for three hours a day.

Consider the volunteer nature of the system these figures are, indeed, very creditable and the suburban libraries are commendable from the standpoint of civic interest and neighbourly co-operation. (Page 108)

Apart from a subscription varying from six to ten shillings per year, there is no check on membership and, if one so wished, it would be possible to belong to every library in Christchurch. (Page 109)

Suburban loyalty ensures, at any rate to a large extent, that the majority of residents prefer to patronise their own library, even if another is slightly more accessible.

The very fact that libraries in St Martins and Opawa serve 1551 and 2385 persons respectively while those in St Albans and Linwood have to attempt to cope with approximately 42,000 between them should be sufficient for any enthusiastic supporter of the existing system to hang his head in shame.

These two libraries have to serve, besides their own districts, North Richmond, Richmond, Avonside, North Linwood and East Linwood. (Page 110)

“As suggested in the preface, and emphasised throughout the entire work, good library facilities are a first essential of a high standard of culture, and the use made of those facilities must be entered to the cultural credit or debt of the citizens concerned.

With the increasing complexity of the pattern of human life it becomes more than ever imperative that each and every one of us should make a sincere and determined effort to understand our fellow humans throughout the world.

Without understanding, tolerance is impossible. Without tolerance, war and destruction are not only possible but highly probable.

In numerous instances, that indispensable tolerance can be acquired by reading, and the necessary books should be available in any public library worthy of the name.

If those books are not available, if, in other words, a public library service is not fulfilling its correct function, then it is of the utmost importance that the deficiencies are brought to light… (Page 148)

Even if the adults of today are merely interested in the welfare of their children, it would at least be reasonable to suggest that those children will, in their turn as parents, have also an appreciation of the value of good literature and the spirit of tolerance. (Page 152)”
– Thesis by D. E. Wood, November 1950

– Appendix B: ‘The Canterbury Public Library Act, 1873’ (Page 156)

– Christchurch City Suburban Libraries Map with Population numbers from the 1945 Census (Page 165)

Other Links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christchurch_City_Libraries
https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/brief-history-christchurch-city-libraries/
https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/factsheet/ Timeline
https://heritage.christchurchcitylibraries.com/Archives/52/Library150/
‘Celebrating 150 Years Christchurch City Libraries: 1859 – 2009’
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/st-albans-community-centre-1867-2021/
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/charles-duggan/
My ancestor, Charles Duggan was the first Librarian of the Knightstown Library (Dover Street).
The Library opened in 1867 as the St Albans Mutual Improvement Association & Reading Room.
“From this small beginning the Christchurch suburban library system developed.”

Emmett Character Area

Q. What is a ‘Character Area’ according to the Christchurch City Council?

A. Character Areas (previously known as Special Amenity Areas or SAMs) are areas in residential neighbourhoods that are distinctive from their surroundings and are considered to have a character worthy of retention.
The Christchurch District Plan includes character area overlays in 15 Christchurch locations.
https://ccc.govt.nz/consents-and-licences/resource-consents/resource-consent-activities/residential-and-housing/character-areas


‘The Management of Suburban Amenity Values in Christchurch City’, July 1997
Suburban Amenity Christchurch Report
– Page 20
The amenity values and garden city design of Christchurch are to a large extent the result of the vision shown by the city fathers in designing and providing the city’s green spaces over 100 years ago.
City heritage is expressed through the city’s inherited assets including buildings, places, objects, trees, natural features, archaeological sites, and sites of significance to tangata whenua.
– Page 21
Special Amenity Areas
Special Amenity Areas (SAMs) have been identified in Living Zones as areas with special aspects or characteristics that contribute to the pleasantness of an area including the scale, age and style of buildings, the lack of intrusions or the level of intactness, the combination of streetscape and vegetation, and the intimacy of the street scene.


Christchurch Suburban Character Areas Assessment, January 2015
Assessment Report
– 7 Character Areas 10 and 10a: Slater / Poulton and Dudley Assessment
Pages 39 – 44
– 18 Character Area 37: Emmett Street Assessment
Pages 111 – 117
18.1 Area Description
Character Area 37 is located in Mairehau, north of Shirley Road and west of Marshland Road to the north-east of the central city.
Character Area 37 comprises the length of Emmett Street.
The area has been identified as a Character Area due to the consistent style and era of dwellings (primarily consisting of state housing of the 1940s and 1950s), consistently generous street setbacks, low or no fencing (enabling good visual connectivity between dwellings and the street), well-landscaped gardens and a relatively narrow, high-amenity streetscape. The street pattern is a curvilinear street, which wraps around McFarlane Park.
18.2 Streetscape Elements
The underlying topography of the site is flat, with no notable long or short views. This area has significant streetscape quality, with a street width of approximately 20m and wide grass berms (approximately 3m) on either side of the carriageway (located between the carriageway and the footpath) within which mature street trees are planted (spaced at approximately 15m down the length of the street).
These street trees create a canopy over the street and this in conjunction with the grass berms, large front yard setbacks and small scale of dwellings give the street a spacious yet intimate character & provide a pleasant pedestrian environment.
18.4 Conclusion
The continuity and coherence of Character Area 37 – comprising of the streetscape and site character elements (landscape and built form) is consistent.
This Character Area has approximately 92% of sites that are classified as either primary or contributory.
– Page 121
Character Area 37: Emmett Street
Recommendations: It is recommended that Character Area 37 – Emmett Street, is retained as a Character Area in its entirety (as illustrated in the Site Classification and Boundary Map, Appendix 16).


‘The Proposed Christchurch Replacement District Plan’, 2 May 2015
Character Areas Info Sheet
– Christchurch City Character Areas (Formerly ‘Special Amenity Areas’)
Character Areas, which used to be known as special amenity areas (or SAMs) will be changed as a result of proposals in stage two of the district plan review.
Character Areas are residential parts of the city that contain a set of qualities (eg building style/type/age) that make the area distinctive and of value to the district.
– There will be two types of Character Areas:
Category 1 Character Areas have the highest character value.
Category 2 Character Areas have moderate character value and the rules mainly seek to retain the streetscape character between the house and the street boundary.
– CA 11: Dudley, SAM 10 (Slater/Poulton), Category 1, Restricted Discretionary Activity – rule 14.2.2.3.22 RD22
CA 32: Emmett SAM 37 (Emmett Street), Category 1, Restricted Discretionary Activity – rule 14.2.2.3.22 RD22


Christchurch Suburban Residential Character Areas, July 2015
Classification & Boundary Maps for Category 1 Character Areas
– Page 6
Appendix 5 – Character Areas 10 and 10a: Site Classification and Boundary Map (Dudley)
– Page 22
Appendix 16 – Character Area 37: Site Classification and Boundary Map (Emmett)


Partial Assessment of Benefits and Costs of Character Areas, 18 August 2015
Assessment Report
– Page 3
1.3 Engaged by the Christchurch City Council (Council) to provide
evidence on the assessment of the costs and benefits of the Character Area rules in the Residential Proposal of the proposed Replacement District Plan (pRDP).
– Page 4
3.1 The analysis undertaken in the Report comprises an objective assessment of the benefits of Character Areas (hedonic valuation), and subjective assessment of the benefits and costs of the Character Areas (survey).
– Page 31
4.2 Sample Method
Letters were sent by the Christchurch City Council (CCC) on 9 July 2015 to all households within the Character Area, excluding properties belonging to Housing New Zealand, Orion and the Council.
The letter noted that the household was within a Character area, and requested that they fill out the survey with the web link directing them to the site.
4.3 Response
The survey received 430 responses, of which 70 were discarded as incomplete. A further 3 were removed because they responded that they were not within any of the listed character areas.
Of the 357 completed responses 110 came from the Beckenham Loop area, and a further 73 from Dudley.
These two areas therefore contribute strongly to the overall responses, but analysis of the sample shows that the sample is reasonably representative.
These two largest groups (Dudley and Beckenham Loop) are represented in the sample at approximately the same proportion as their representation in the overall character area.
– Page 32
Figure 3: Survey sample representation by Character Area designation
– Page 33
Table 3: Response count and proportion by character area
CA 32 – Emmett (Emmett Street)
Response Count = 13, Response Proportion = 3.6%, Proportion of properties in total = 7%
[See 4.2 “excluding properties belonging to Housing New Zealand”, this area of Shirley is predominately Housing New Zealand.]
– Page 35
Figure 5: Question 3 – important aspects of character areas (proportion of respondents)
‘Street Trees’ received over 70%, 2nd to ‘Age and style of houses’
– Page 52
Table 5: Comparative data for Question 3 – Aspects of character areas


Independent Hearings Panel, 18th August 2015
Urban Design – Character Areas, Overlays and the Residential Small Settlement Zone Built Forms Standards
– Page 9
Matters of agreement
(c) The deletion of CA32 Emmett Street
– Page 26
Submission #2378 (Crown)
7.3 In addition to the Category 2 Character Areas, the Crown identifies Category 1 Character Areas with a high rate of Housing New Zealand Corporation property ownership. These are CA32 Emmett, CA29 Auburn and CA7 Piko.
7.4 While distinctly different from each other, each of the areas identified by the Crown reflects a highly intact street layout, subdivision pattern, site and building layouts and landscape qualities that are highly representative of the eras in which they were established.
7.5 Of these areas, CA 32 Emmett offers the most substantial gain in housing density under the Comprehensive Housing Redevelopment Mechanism (CHRM), particularly in conjunction with the wider Shirley area which has been the subject of a master plan process for redevelopment undertaken by Housing New Zealand Corporation in consultation with Council.
While I support the retention of all three Character Areas, from a resource management perspective and taking into account the Ministers’ SOE, with my knowledge of potential residential density gains of Emmett Street within the wider context of Shirley, I consider that the area provides significant benefit in respect to the potential increase in residential unit numbers, if redeveloped comprehensively. As such, I do not oppose the deletion of CA 32 Emmett Street.


‘Council moves to protect special areas from new housing rules’, 26 Nov 2021
https://www.newsline.ccc.govt.nz/news/story/council-moves-to-protect-special-areas-from-new-housing-rules
Christchurch City Council is assessing which areas of the city would be unsuitable to enable more housing when the government’s new rules are applied.
The National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 (NPS-UD) and the recently-announced Resource Management (Enabling Housing Supply and other matters) Amendment Bill will make it easier for new housing to be built in cities around the country as local Councils will have less ability to request resource consents for proposed developments.
However, Councils will be able manage housing development in areas they deem unsuitable if features or areas are listed in the Christchurch District Plan as ‘qualifying matters’.
Some qualifying matters have already been listed in the NPS-UD, such as outstanding natural features and landscapes, natural hazards and historic heritage. Although the Council can include other matters as qualifying matters, the NPS-UD limit this to matters that are site-specific, supported by evidence, and where the costs and broader impacts of imposing these limits are assessed.


‘Character areas protected from housing intensification rules’, 13 Apr 2022
https://www.newsline.ccc.govt.nz/environment/story/character-areas-protected-from-housing-intensification-rules
Residential areas of Christchurch with special character value are being protected from new housing intensification rules.
Christchurch City Council has begun consulting with the public on its Draft Housing and Business Choice Plan Change, which will enable medium density housing development to occur in most residential parts of the city without the need for resource consent.
Residential areas can only be exempted from those rules if Councils can provide evidence that they are unsuitable for the amount of increased housing enabled by the legislation, referred to in the legislation as ‘Qualifying Matters’.
“We have taken the position in our Draft Housing and Business Choice Plan Change that most of the 15 Character Area overlays in the current Christchurch District Plan meet the threshold to become Qualifying Matters,” says Council Head of Planning and Consents John Higgins.
“We are proposing that these areas should be treated differently than other residential areas in the city, meaning the amount of intensification allowed should be reduced,” Mr Higgins says.
Character Areas are identified in the District Plan as areas in residential neighbourhoods that are distinctive from their wider surroundings and are considered to be worthy of retaining.
They were last reviewed in 2015, on the basis that at least 80 percent of the properties in the area contributed to the character values that made it special. [The Emmett Character Area has approximately 92% of sites that are classified as either primary or contributory].
“Residential character is created from the way that different physical elements of our neighbourhoods come together,” explains Mr Higgins.
This might include the combination of a landscape setting, such as a riverside esplanade or an avenue of trees, or with a grouping of properties with buildings of the same era, with consistent architecture and scale. [Emmett Street]
These character areas can make neighbourhoods feel quite special and we want to protect them as much as we can,” Mr Higgins says.
Examples of remaining character areas include Dudley in Richmond.


Land Use Recovery Plan, April 2024
Appendix 2: Amendments to the Christchurch City Plan
Amendment 1B: Community Housing Redevelopment Mechanism (CHRM)
– Page 18
Community Housing Unit: means a residential unit supplied by Christchurch City Council, Housing New Zealand or a Registered Community Housing provider (under Part 10 of the Housing Restructuring and Tenancy Matters Act, 1992) and which is offered for rental as Social Housing (as defined at Section 2 of the Housing Restructuring and Tenancy Matters Act, 1992).
Community Housing Redevelopment Mechanism, Map 8 Shirley
– Page 26
Map 8 Shirley, extent of the proposed CHRM Area.


Christchurch City Council Residential Intensification, 2025
https://ccc.govt.nz/consents-and-licences/resource-consents/resource-consent-activities/residential-and-housing/residential-intensification
– Community Housing Redevelopment Mechanism
Community houses are rental social housing units supplied by Christchurch City Council, Housing New Zealand Corporation, a not-for-profit housing organisation, or a Registered Community Housing provider.
– What is the Community Housing Redevelopment Mechanism?
The Community Housing Redevelopment Mechanism (CHRM) is a set of rules in the District Plan that apply to specific areas of Christchurch that contain clusters of social or community housing. The rules enable medium density redevelopment to provide for better use of land and a wider range of housing types to suit different kinds of households (e.g. town houses and terrace houses).


It was ironic to find during my research, that these ‘Character Areas’ on either side of Shirley Road have received different fates based on their ‘original’ social housing status (North Richmond) & ‘current’ community housing status (Shirley) by being excluded due to the Community Housing Redevelopment Mechanism (CHRM) rules.

See: https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/site-history/
Chancellor Street Heritage Houses
“New Zealand Premier ‘King’ Dick Seddon’s Liberal Government (1893-1906) wanted architectural variety, rather than uniformity, in the design of the workers’ dwellings. Local architects submitted entries to design competitions held throughout New Zealand and the dwellings were built by local contractors.”
“The Chancellor Street houses also form part of New Zealand’s heritage of state housing generally. The setting is the original 1914 rectangular land parcel with a small garden between the house and the roadway and a larger open space at the rear.”
Dudley Character Area
“In Christchurch, some of these homes were designed by some prominent local architects including Hurst Segar, Cecil Wood, Barlow and England.
Three pockets of these homes were built in Christchurch in 1918 to 1920, one being in Chancellor Street. Of the three pockets of these homes built in Christchurch, little remains of the other two, so Chancellor Street is unique in the fact that they are all still there and are in good hands.”

“Richard Seddon, concerned at the number of homeless and substandard conditions, decided that the the State should play a larger part in housing. Seddon came from England and had seen for himself good quality council housing available to low income families.”
https://www.riseuprichmond.nz/dudley-character-area/

So while Dudley Character Area in North Richmond remains (Dudley Street trees are protected), Emmett Character Area in Shirley (Emmett Street trees are not protected) has been removed.


Significant Trees

Q. What is a ‘Significant Tree’ according to the Christchurch City Council?

A. “Trees are a major part of the city’s character and amenity.
Trees are identified as being ‘significant’ because they have particular botanical, heritage, amenity, landscape, cultural, ecological and/or environmental values.”
https://ccc.govt.nz/consents-and-licences/resource-consents/resource-consent-activities/general-rules-and-information/protected-trees-and-guidelines


“A society grows great, when old men plant trees, whose shade they know, they shall never sit it.” – Greek Proverb


‘Trees to be pruned’, The Press, 18th June 1985
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19850618.2.53
The trees in Emmett Street will not be topped but they will be pruned, the City Council decided last evening. Residents of the Shirley street petitioned the council to have the pin oaks that line the street topped to let in more light, and avoid power and telephone lines.
The council believes that topping the trees would spoil their natural beauty.
Several councillors agreed that the trees did inhibit lighting in the street and some branches did grow over property boundaries. However, they did not want to see the mature trees topped or removed.
The director of parks and recreation reserves, Mr Neiel Drain, said the Emmett Street trees were pruned regularly. Topping would promote bushy growth that would further inhibit light and cause problems with overhead lines.
The council supported the retention of the parks and recreation department’s practice of pruning street trees to retain the natural form and beauty of the trees and approved its adoption for all street trees belonging to the council.


4.0 Rules ­ Special Purpose (Road) Zone
https://www.ccc.govt.nz/assets/Documents/The-Council/Plans-Strategies-Policies-Bylaws/Plans/City-plan/14-V3-Part-8.pdf
4.5.4 Removal or major pruning of any tree in Road Zone
Updated 14 November 2005
Category B ­
Street plantings of special historic, landscape and specimen value
Emmett Street: Landscape


Greenspace Traffic Works Committee, 4th March 2009, Meeting Minutes
http://archived.ccc.govt.nz/council/agendas/2009/april/spgreenspacetrafficworks1st/shirleypapanuigreenspacetrafficworkscommitteeagenda1april2009.pdf
Pages 3 – 8
Purpose of Report: To recommend that the Board recommend to Council that the request to undertake height reduction pruning (topping) of the protected scarlet oak trees in Emmett Street be declined.
Executive Summary: The trees in Emmett Street are protected through the Christchurch City Plan for their landscape value under Volume 3: Part 8 Special Purpose Zone 4.5.4 Removal or major pruning of any tree in Road Zone as category B trees.
Legal Considerations: The rules for pruning trees protected under Part 8 Special Purpose Zones are :
“In addition to any relevant rules applicable to listed protected trees in Appendix 4, part 10 of the Plan, within any of the streets listed in the SP (Road) Zone listed below:
(a) No tree shall be removed”
The Greenspace Manager has the following delegation with respect to trees:
“In consultation with any other units affected and the relevant Community Board, authorise the planting or removal of trees from any reserve or other property under the Manager’s control.”
Therefore the delegated authority to approve or decline this request lies with the Transport and Greenspace Manager or the Community Board.

Volume 2 : Section 4 City Identity
4.2.1 Policy: Tree Cover
To promote amenity values in the urban area by maintaining and enhancing the tree cover present in the City. Tree cover and vegetation make an important contribution to amenity values in the City. Through the redevelopment of sites, existing vegetation is often lost and not replaced. The City Plan protects those trees identified as “heritage” or “notable” and the subdivision process protects other trees which are considered to be “significant”.

4.2.2 Policy: Garden City
To recognise and promote the “Garden City” identity, heritage and character of Christchurch. A key aspect of achieving this policy will be maintaining and extending environments and vegetation types which compliment this image.
A broad range of matters influence and contribute to this image, including the following:
tree-lined streets and avenues
– parks and developed areas of open space

14.3.2 Policy: “Garden City” image identity
To acknowledge and promote the “Garden City” identity of the City by protecting, maintaining and extending planting which compliments this image.

Volume 3: Part 8 Special Purpose Zone
14.3.5 Street Trees
Nearly half the length of streets within the city contains street trees, but the presence of very high quality street trees which add considerable presence to streets and neighbourhoods is confined to a relatively small proportion of the road network. These streets add particular character and amenity of the city, either in the form of avenues which form points into the city, or an important part of the local character of particular streets.

Background:
31. The scarlet oak trees in Emmett Street were planted in 1950 and 1970.
There are 115 trees.
32. They are significant to Christchurch City as a landscape feature for size, form and age.
33. It is possible that they also have significance to Christchurch for commemorative purposes as it has been suggested that they were planted to commemorate soldiers in World War II. This has not been confirmed.
34. Topping the trees would have a negative effect on them as a landscape feature and would negate the reason why they were protected.
35. A conservative value of $2.7 million (using STEM Standard Tree Evaluation Method, which is the national aboricultural industry standard for evaluating and valuing amenity trees) has recently been placed on them. Topping them would reduce the value by approximately $900,000.
36. Approving the request may lead to residents with similar requests (e.g. Massey Crescent, Severn Street, Dudley Street etc) expecting the same result.
This would have serious consequences for the Garden City image.
37. Council has declined similar requests from residents in other streets with significant trees.

The Preferred Option:
(a) decline the request to reduce the height of the trees in Emmett Street; and
(b) that the trees in Emmett Street be maintained to internationally recognised and accepted arboricultural standards and practices.


Christchurch City Council Proposed Tree Policy, March 2010
http://archived.ccc.govt.nz/Council/agendas/2010/August/ShirleyPapanui18th/Clause7Attachment1ProposedTreePolicy.pdf
– Trees make an important contribution to the health and wellbeing of Christchurch’s residents and to the Garden City image through the quality of the city’s landscape.
– Trees play a vital ecological, environmental, heritage, financial and cultural role. They have an important contribution to make in the sustainable management of natural and physical resources.
– Christchurch is internationally recognised as the Garden City and one of the city’s greatest assets is its trees.
– This is a tribute to those people past and present who on public and private land have planted a wide range of trees and other vegetation.
– The rate of development and urban intensification places pressure on privately owned protected trees and those that are not protected through the City Plan.
– Urban intensification places more pressure on public spaces to provide the vegetation amenity that was once provided for on private land.
– Retention of existing juvenile and mature trees, replacing old trees and the planting of new trees in public spaces therefore presents a significant contribution to retaining and enhancing the city’s Garden City image.
– Council considers that it should be seen as taking a proactive stance by retaining trees wherever possible within the environment.


Q. So how did the ‘Emmett Street Oak Trees’ go from being ‘significant’ to Christchurch City, part of the “Garden City” identity & “an important part of the local character of a particular street”: Emmett Street, to receiving a ‘Start Work Notice’ (SWN) in January 2025, for 17 of Malcolm’s Oak Trees to be removed?

A. “As a result of a process introduced under the Canterbury Earthquake emergency powers legislation (the CER Act), protection is being removed from 80% of Christchurch’s notable trees.
We are a group who has organised to fight this environmental disaster, coming on top of so much other earthquake loss.
So far we have negotiated a deal which would see more than 900 of these trees saved. We need help to save the rest, and to make sure that no one backs out of the agreement that has already been reached.”
https://givealittle.co.nz/fundraiser/chchnotabletrees/


Independent Hearings Panel, March 2015
Christchurch Replacement District Plan
https://chchplan.ihp.govt.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Decision-63-Schedule-1-Chapter-9.4-Trees-Appendix-9.4.7.pdf
– Appendix 9.4.7.1.2 – Schedule of Groups of Trees
Pages 53 – 57
– Appendix 9.4.7.2 – Schedule of Significant Trees in Road Corridors, Parks, Reserves and Public Open Space
Pages 58 – 106
Malcolm’s ‘Emmett Street Oak Trees’ are not included in either Appendix.


‘Tree Protection Change Rankles Christchurch Residents’
The Press, January 29, 2016
https://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/76383155/tree-protection-change-rankles-christchurch-residents
– Big beautiful trees are an integral part of Christchurch’s garden city image.
Rules protect thousands of trees on private land, but under the proposed Christchurch Replacement District Plan protection measures for those trees are in for some radical changes.
– Under the current Christchurch District Plan, the tree is listed as a Protected and Notable tree but under the proposed Christchurch Replacement District Plan, which is currently the subject of an extensive hearing process…
– The new schedule under the proposed plan cuts the list of about 1600 protected trees on private land to only 400 by using a new assessment method.
Predictably the massive excision of a host of clearly loved trees in the garden city has caused consternation.
– The controversy is partly about the assessment process used to prune the list of trees on the current list of 1600 trees.
– The council used a system called the Christchurch Tree Evaluation Methodology (CTEM) to come up with the new list. The system is designed to overcome the subjectivity of the assessor and the ability of a tree to become listed because of a high score in one category, such as age.
– Submitters opposing the new method and list are worried about the threshold and the lack of importance attached to the landscape values of trees.
– [Arborist Michael] Ontash sees problems with that. He says that could potentially withdraw protection from over 2800 significant trees that might score below the threshold using CTEM but still make a large contribution to the garden city image.


‘Call To Save Christchurch Trees’
RNZ, 7 February 2016
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/regional/295951/call-to-save-christchurch-trees
– Christchurch residents are urging the council to save more than 1500 heritage and notable trees from being delisted and losing protection in the city’s plan.
– A group of advocates for the trees is raising money through a “give a little” campaign for a legal challenge to the proposal.
– Some trees listed as notable under the current Christchurch District Plan, will not be protected under the proposed Christchurch Replacement District Plan.
– The new law, which is being fast-tracked under earthquake recovery legislation, would change planning rules to make it easier to develop property, reducing the number of protected trees by 80 percent.
– Mark Belton is a professional forester and advocate for heritage trees. He told Radio New Zealand’s Sunday Morning programme that Christchurch had the greatest variety of trees of any city on the planet.
– Another opponent of the rule change, Barbara Stewart, said the council was considering reducing the number of protected trees from 1900 to just 380.
She said after losing so many old buildings to the earthquakes, the city’s trees were one of its few remaining connections to the past.
Ms Stewart described removing the trees’ protection as a man-made disaster.


‘Council Reneges On Deal To Protect Trees’
RNZ, 5 August 2016
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/310195/council-reneges-on-deal-to-protect-trees
– Christchurch City Council is being accused of shameful behaviour in going back on an agreement to protect the city’s notable trees.
– In February, it signed an agreement with heritage advocates to save more than 800 trees that faced losing their protected status because of changes to planning rules.
It has now cancelled that agreement.
– One of those who wants the trees protected, Mark Belton, said some of them dated back to when the city was first settled.
They were one of the few reminders of the past in a city that had lost most of its heritage buildings to the earthquakes, he said.
“This is something the people of Christchurch really expressed a preference for in the Share An Idea exercise where people were given an opportunity to express what sort of city they wanted and the most overwhelming response was about making the city greener and more attractive.
“And then we have these sorts of things happening which are essentially driving the whole process in reverse.”


“On October 7, 2016 the Independent Hearing Panel (IHP) publicly notified its Tree decision – a decision that overall, has delivered a positive outcome.
The key elements of the IHP’s decision are as follows:
1) Our Mediated Agreement with the Christchurch City Council has been upheld, with 80% of the original 1623 trees on private land remaining on the Christchurch Plan schedule;
2) The Panel has also directed that the 724 listed trees on public land be returned to the Plan; and
3) The new Plan still contains a suite of provisions (objective, policies and rules) that continue to provide recognition and some protection for scheduled trees.
Overall, although we have lost some very good trees and still retain misgivings for the future (particularly given the culture within Council that proposed so drastic a reduction (ca. 84%) of the Heritage and Notable tree schedule in the first place) we believe this is a very good result for the Christchurch community and the landscape character of our city.
https://givealittle.co.nz/fundraiser/chchnotabletrees/updates

“2) The Panel has also directed that the 724 listed trees on public land be returned to the Plan”, but the ‘Emmett Street Oak Trees’ were not returned to the Christchurch District Plan & are no longer classified as ‘significant’ or protected for the future.


Significant Trees Qualifying Matters Technical Report, June 2022
Christchurch City Council Report
– Page 5
17. Varying forms, shapes and textures of trees contributes to the amenity values3 of a place. By providing specific landmarks within an urban landscape, the physical feature of a tree can help identify a specific location. Through physical responses to the environment, trees can add micro-changes to an urban landscape, such as responses to the wind and shading effects. Through their own growth and seasonal
change, trees allow people to mark change over time. Urban structures, in comparison, can be erected within months and then remain unchanging, providing only a very limited sense of change over time.
18. Trees are also valued as they connect with people’s historical associations and memories. In addition, trees within the urban landscapes are easily accessible on a daily basis as they are located in proximity to where people live.
– Page 6
18. Trees are often planted for sentimental or cultural reasons…Public and private trees are also planted as markers, as physical links to sister Cities, or as records of notable events and memorials…Over time, these trees become even more valuable to the community and provide a human connection with history.
– Page 8
3.2 CTEM Criteria for Group Trees
36. Group of Trees means a cluster, grove, or line of trees (including the root systems) that may be the same or variable species, either planted or naturally occurring that:
are located in close geographic proximity to each other and meet at least one of the following criteria: canopies are touching; or canopies are overlapping…
– Page 15
3.4.7 Visibility
Visibility is a measure of the prominence of the tree in the wider landscape…It is a measure of how far the tree can be seen from, and is different from “Location”,
which is a measure as to the frequency of viewing.
3.4.8 Location
Location is a measure of how many people see the tree(s) and is based on site profile e.g. road hierarchy…The tree is assessed based on where it is located. e.g. if the tree is located in an urban park that borders an urban arterial road…
[The ‘Emmett Street Trees’ are off Shirley Road, which is a Minor Arterial Road & the trees are clearly visible at this intersection].
– Page 23
3.6.2 Heritage
Association: There is a recorded association with a major natural or planned event, or an eminent person by the presence of a plaque or other written record.
Commemoration: Well documented planting to commemorate an occasion or occasions of importance in New Zealand’s history such as battles or treaties.
– Page 29
127. Over time, these trees become even more valuable to the community and provide a human connection with history, though they may not be yet listed as Heritage under the District Plan.
128. Recording these historical human connections becomes more important through time.
– Page 31
136. Trees perform very important environmental, social and cultural services within current and future urban landscapes. Trees that are listed in the Schedule of Significant Trees have the highest legal protection afforded to trees in Christchurch.
– See also: 3.4.9 Role, 3.5 Environmental and Ecological, 3.5.1 Services, 3.5.2 Canopy Volume, 3.6 Exceptional Evaluation & 3.6.1 Landscape.


Christchurch District Plan (2025)
Chapter 9 Natural and Cultural Heritage
9.4 Significant and Other Trees
https://districtplan.ccc.govt.nz/?docId=BJN6TOTWF9M%3d

9.4.2.1.1 Objective – Trees
a. Maintain and enhance the contribution of the Christchurch District’s significant trees listed in Appendix 9.4.7.1, and trees in road corridors, parks, reserves and public open space, to community amenity through:
i. landscape character and amenity;
ii. heritage and cultural values;
iii. purification of air and rainwater;
iv. releasing oxygen and storing carbon;
v. cooling of the built environment and waterways;
vi. stormwater and erosion management; and
vii. biodiversity protection and enhancement;
while providing for the reasonable use and enjoyment of property and landowner responsibilities.

9.4.2.2 Policies
9.4.2.2.1 Policy – Identification and assessment of significant trees for scheduling in the District Plan
a. Identify trees, including groups of trees, and assess them for significance and/or exceptional values according to the following:
i. botanical value;
ii. historic heritage value;
iii. amenity value;
iv. landscape value;
v. cultural value; and
vi. ecological and/or environmental value.

9.4.2.2.3 Policy – Tree protection
a. Protect from inappropriate physical works:
i. trees that are listed in Appendix 9.4.7.1, particularly those trees identified as having exceptional values; and
ii. trees in road corridors, parks, reserves and public open space where they provide amenity value and/or collectively contribute to the character and environmental quality of the Christchurch District, to the extent consistent with maintaining the multiple functions of road corridors, parks, reserves and public open space.

9.4.2.2.4 Policy – Tree maintenance
a. To enable the maintenance and management of trees that are listed in Appendix 9.4.7.1 and trees in the road corridors, parks, public open space and reserves in recognition that such works may be necessary to:
i. ensure the continuing health, structural integrity and amenity value of the trees;
ii. enable the reasonable use and enjoyment of the property and surrounds; and
iii. minimise the risk from the trees to public safety, property, buildings, strategic infrastructure and electricity distribution lines.

9.4.2.2.5 Policy – Trees and utilities
a. Where it would not be reasonable to locate outside of the dripline of a significant tree listed in Appendix 9.4.7.1 due to locational, technical or operational requirements, ensure that the utility is appropriately designed, located and installed to maintain as far as practicable the specific values of the tree.

9.4.2.2.6 Policy – Trees in road corridors, parks, reserves and public open space
a. Road corridors, parks, reserves, and public open space are planted with trees to enhance environmental, landscape, cultural, social and economic values.
b. Identify significant trees, including groups of trees, in road corridors, parks, reserves, and public open space and list them in Appendix 9.4.7.2.

9.4.2.2.7 Policy – Felling of trees
a. For trees listed in Appendix 9.4.7.1:
i. limit the felling of significant trees, except where there are no reasonable alternatives enabling retention of the tree due to its condition, or where the use and enjoyment of a property and surrounds is significantly compromised or diminished; and
ii. avoid the felling of significant trees that are identified as having exceptional values, except where there are no reasonable alternatives, or where the use and enjoyment of a property and surrounds is significantly compromised or diminished.
b. Limit the felling of trees in road corridors, parks, public open space and reserves having regard to size, location and species, except where there are no reasonable alternatives.

9.4.3 How to interpret and apply the rules
a. To understand whether a site has a significant tree(s), including groups of trees, listed in the Schedule of Significant Trees, and the nature of this listing, refer to Appendix 9.4.7.1 and the planning maps.
b. The rules that apply to significant trees and trees in parks, road corridors, reserves and public open space are contained in the activity status tables (including activity specific standards) in Rules 9.4.4.1.1 – 9.4.4.1.6. Trees listed in Appendix 9.4.7.2 form part of the wider set of trees referred to as trees in road corridors, parks, public open spaces and reserves.


Chapter 9 Natural and Cultural Heritage
9.4 Significant and Other Trees
9.4.7 Appendices
Appendix 9.4.7.2 Schedule of significant trees in road corridors, parks, reserves and public open space
https://districtplan.ccc.govt.nz/?p=1&docId=Vx15lDOsvwk%3d

George Malcolm’s Emmett Street Oak Trees (located on the north side of Shirley Road) are not included in this Appendix.

But this Appendix does include the following ‘significant’ trees located on the south side of Shirley Road, in North Richmond.

10 Shirley Road, Shirley Community Reserve, ‘Significant’ Trees
– PTG51, 6038, Thuja plicata, Western red cedar
– PTG51, 6039, Quercus coccinea, Scarlet oak
– PTG51, 6041, Liriodendron tulipifera, Tulip Tree
– PTG51, 6042, Liquidambar styraciflua, Sweet gum
– PTG51, 6043, Platanus x acerifolia, London plane
– PTG51, 6044, Fagus sylvatica Purpurea, Copper beech
– PTG51, 6046, Tilia x europaea, Common lime
– PTG51, 6047, Quercus robur, English oak

Dudley Street, Dudley Character Area, Road corridor, ‘Significant’ Trees
25 Quercus heterophylla, Bartram’s oak
STG25: 4596, 4597, 4598, 4599, 4601, 4602, 4603, 4604, 4605, 4606, 4607, 4608, 4609, 4610, 4611, 4612, 4613, 4614, 4615, 4616, 4617, 4670, 4671, 4672, 4674


Q. So why are the trees on the south side of Shirley Road in Richmond, classified as ‘Significant’ Trees, whilst George Malcolm’s ‘Emmett Street Oak Trees’ (located on the north side of Shirley Road in Shirley) are not?

A. Maybe because these trees are located in the Shirley Community Reserve & North Richmond, which is classified as the ‘Dudley Character Area’:
https://ccc.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Consents-and-Licences/resource-consents/Forms/Character-Areas/Dudley-Design-Guide-2019.pdf
George Malcolm’s ‘Emmett Street Oak Trees’ in Shirley were originally classified & protected as part of the ‘Emmett Character Area’.
But in 2025, this ‘Character Area’ no longer exists in the new Christchurch District Plan.
See: Emmett Character Area