Equity and Inclusion

1. Strengthening Communities Together Strategy (2022)
2. Christchurch City Council Equity and Inclusion Policy (2024)
– CCC Equity and Inclusion Policy | Blog Post
– Draft Equity and Inclusion Policy | Written Submission
– ‘Designing for Differences’ Framework/Audit Tool

3. CCC Equity and Inclusion Policy | Definitions
4. CCC Equity and Inclusion Policy | Principles
5. CCC Equity and Inclusion Policy | Policy Detail
6. Christchurch City Council | Decisions
CCC Community Facilities | Built Post Earthquakes
Christchurch District Plan Changes (2025)
7. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board | Decisions
Advocating for Funding in the CCC Annual & Long Term Plans
Advocating for Funding for the ‘Shirley Community Centre’
‘Shirley Community Facility’ Options
Advocating to relocate the Shirley Library to Shirley Road
Moving the Shirley Library to the Shirley Community Reserve
(Matatiki Hornby Centre & Ōmōkihi South Library)
8. Christchurch City Libraries
Christchurch City Libraries | Visitor & Issues Stats
Christchurch City Libraries | Locations Per Community Board
Christchurch City Libraries | Built Post Earthquakes (List)
Christchurch City Libraries | Built Post Earthquakes (Per Ward)
Christchurch City Libraries | Libraries 2025 Facilities Plan
Christchurch City Libraries | East ‘Suburban’ Libraries
Christchurch City Libraries | Auahatanga – Creative Spaces
9. Education Providers
10. Support Providers
11. Existing Community Facilities
12. Local Green Spaces
13. Bookable Spaces & Local Activities Available
14. ReVision Youth Friendly Spaces Audits
ReVision Youth Friendly Spaces Audit Report | Shirley Library (2021)
ReVision Youth Friendly Spaces Audit Report | 10 Shirley Road (2021)
15. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ | Equity and Inclusion
– Shirley Community Facility Plan v1 | Written Submission
– Shirley Community Facility Plan v2 | Written Submission


1. Strengthening Communities Together Strategy (2022)
Strong communities give people a sense of belonging and encourage them to take part in social, cultural, economic and political life.
Te Haumako Te Whitingia Strengthening Communities Together Strategy 2022 details the Council’s commitment to building inclusive, safe, resilient and connected communities.
The Strategy contains four pou/pillars:
PEOPLE: The city actively promotes a culture of equity by valuing diversity and fostering inclusion across communities and generations.
PLACE: We help build connections between communities and their places and spaces to foster a sense of local identity, shared experience and stewardship.
PARTICIPATION: Residents and groups in the wider community are socially and actively engaged and able to initiate and influence decisions that affect their lives.
PREPAREDNESS: People feel safe in their communities and neighbourhoods and work together to understand, adapt and thrive in the context of change and disruption.
https://ccc.govt.nz/the-council/plans-strategies-policies-and-bylaws/strategies/strengthening-communities-together-strategy
Full Document:
https://ccc.govt.nz/assets/Documents/The-Council/Plans-Strategies-Policies-Bylaws/Strategies/Te-Haumako-Te-Whitingia-Strengthening-Communities-Together-Strategy-document-WEB.pdf


2. Christchurch City Council Equity and Inclusion Policy (2024)
The Equity and Inclusion Policy describes our approach to enabling people from all communities and all areas of the city to have equitable access to our services.
It recognises the Council’s responsibility to ensure that decision-making reflects its commitment to fostering equity and inclusion for all residents…
and recognises that some of our residents may face disproportionate disadvantages in accessing Council services. The purpose of the policy is to ensure that equity and inclusion are embedded into everything we do.
The policy is intended to:
– Inform Council decision-making and investment, including grant funding and procurement.
– Apply an equity, access and inclusion lens over all Council services.
https://ccc.govt.nz/the-council/plans-strategies-policies-and-bylaws/policies/strengthening-communities-policies/equity-and-inclusion-policy

– CCC Equity and Inclusion Policy | Blog Post:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/ccc-equity-and-inclusion-policy/

– CCC Draft Equity and Inclusion Policy | Written Submission:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CCCHaveYourSayDraftEquityandInclusion2023JoannaGould.pdf

– ‘Designing for Differences’ Framework/Audit Tool

I am currently researching/developing a ‘Designing for Differences’ Framework/Audit Tool, that could be used in the initial planning/development stages of every new Civic building/facility (libraries, community hubs, playgrounds, swimming pools) & as an audit/assessment tool when redeveloping existing Civic building/facility.
Similar to the ‘Youth Audit Tool’, but with more detailed specifications/observations/accommodations for differences:
– Architectural Design, Environmental Design, Landscape Design, Biophilic Design, Cultural Design, Universal Design
– Interior Design, Colour Scheme, Lighting, Heating, Ventilation, Acoustics, Furniture, Fixtures, Furnishings
– Spatial Design, Layout, Zones (Entrance/Exit, Transition, Landing, Activity & Observation), Wayfinding & Signage.


3. CCC Equity and Inclusion Policy | Definitions
EQUITY: Equality means each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities.
Equity recognises that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome.
People should have equity, regardless of age, gender, disability, ethnicity, culture, faiths, geographical location, sexual orientation, neurodiversity or socio-economic status.
INCLUSION: The practice or policy of providing equitable access to opportunities and resources for people who might otherwise be excluded or marginalised, such as those who have physical, hidden, or mental disabilities and members of other minority and disadvantaged groups.
ACCESSIBILITY: People have equitable access to the physical environment, information, communication, participation and Council services.


4. CCC Equity and Inclusion Policy | Principles
The Council will have regard to the following seven pillars of inclusion:
ACCESS: creating barrier-free access to information and places.
ATTITUDE: celebrating diversity in our city.
CHOICE: providing inclusive spaces for informed community decision-making and participation.
COMMUNICATION: examining and improving the way we share information and let people know about opportunities to get involved.
OPPORTUNITY: enabling active, engaged, and connected communities.
PARTNERSHIP: working together with mana whenua, stakeholders, NGOs and the community.
POLICY: detailing our commitment to, and responsibility for, inclusive practices.


5. CCC Equity and Inclusion Policy | Policy Detail
The Council commits to promoting equity and fostering an environment in which equity and inclusion are valued.
This policy should guide decision-making and action across the organisation.
This means:
1. Understanding and addressing structural exclusion and its impact on delivery of services.
– We will take a collaborative approach to address disproportionate disadvantage in our city, where we can.
– We will treat everyone with dignity and respect their rights and beliefs.
2. Being aware of inequalities and barriers to participation and what this means in decision-making.
– We will build capability across the organisation so that everyone at the Council is aware of inequalities and what this means in their role.
– We will work to foster an environment for residents to provide feedback in a safe and inclusive way.
– We will work to measure the wellbeing of our residents in our monitoring and reporting to ensure Council responses reflect the needs and views of the whole community.
3. Consistently applying equity and diversity principles in everything we do.
– We will integrate equity and inclusion principles across the whole of Council.
– We will actively pursue positive outcomes across our services and programmes.
4. Anticipating, identifying and responding to people’s different needs and circumstances.
– We will utilise inclusive design principles to remove barriers to access to physical spaces, information, and participation.
– We will ensure easy access to Council services and provide information in formats that suit the needs and preferences of our residents.
5. Championing equity and inclusion within the Council to ensure that equitable considerations are integrated in the decision-making and governance of Council.
– We will use an equity, access and inclusion lens to inform decision-making to avoid discrimination promote inclusion and increase fairness in the city, wherever possible.
– As an organisation with resource, influence, and authority, using this lens means that our decisions do not create or perpetuate further inequities.


6. Christchurch City Council | Decisions
CCC Community Facilities | Built Post Earthquakes:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/lgoima-request-ticket-1523989/

LGOIMA [1523989] | Christchurch City Council
Community Facilities Built Post Earthquakes | 2012 – 2026 (List)

Christchurch District Plan Changes (2025):
New ‘High Density Residential Zone’ around The Palms Mall & more ‘Medium Density Residential Zone’ areas in the communities around Shirley Road.
Increase in housing intensification & social housing:
Kāinga Ora – Homes and Communities, Christchurch Developments
https://engage.kaingaora.govt.nz/canterbury-Christchurch
LINZ Central Record of State Land, (Dark Purple = Social Housing)
https://linz.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8501fe601f7648718d0e3a2f3f1ed216


7. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board | Decisions
Advocating for Funding in the CCC Annual & Long Term Plans:
Other Community Boards in Christchurch have been able to secure additional funding for their Community Facilities, as shown in the table below.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/lgoima-request-ticket-1523989/

Why did the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board not advocate for the communities around Shirley Road, in the Innes/Central Wards?

LGOIMA [1523989] | Christchurch City Council
Community Facilities Built Post Earthquakes | 2012 – 2026 (Per Ward)

Advocating for Funding for the ‘Shirley Community Centre’:
CCC Facilities Rebuild Work Left to Complete v Contingency
Page 14
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2017/09/COU_20170906_AGN_4993_AT.PDF
“Contingency Calculations as at August 2017
– Shirley Community Centre, Phase: Concept, Current Budget: $2,621,400
– May be Required from Contingency Fund: $2,378,600
– Probable Year Needed: FY21/FY22
– Comments: Current budget is $2,621,400 which is available in FY21 & FY22.
– Contingency needs to be made for community expectations.
– The current budget would only build back a facility of 447m2.
– The size of the demolished building was 1,500m2.
– If we were to build back to the same meterage we would need $8,250,000.
– Have therefore put in a contingency to allow for a total facility cost of $5M.”

Why didn’t the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board advocate for more funding for the rebuild, to ‘replace’ the ‘Shirley Community Centre’?

‘Shirley Community Facility’ Options:
“The options presented in the report by staff and considered by the Waipapa Community Board were based on many discussions with the community board, various feasibility studies over many years, and existing Council strategies.
In addition,
– the options presented aligned with what was budgeted for in the LTP;
– the Board’s stated desire to see construction of a facility progressed (as evidenced by the Board’s priorities, submission to the LTP and the proposed amendment by Councillor Cotter);
– and took into consideration that fact that no request has been made by the Board or by a Councillor to increase the LTP budgeted fund for a future facility.
Because of this, what you propose was not considered a viable option.
The Board decided to investigate an on-budget community building.”
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/formal-complaint-to-the-christchurch-city-council-21st-may-2025/

Advocating to relocate the Shirley Library to Shirley Road:
Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Agenda, 13th June 2024
Pages 34 – 35
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2024/06/PCBCC_20240613_AGN_9127_AT.PDF
“Options Considered:
– Investigate the relocation of Shirley Library
4.25 The following options were considered but ruled out:
The LTP budget for Shirley Community Centre would be insufficient to include the relocation of Shirley Library and a significant level of additional capital funding would be required.
This option would not be achievable with the existing LTP budget.”

Why didn’t the Board advocate for all their residents in the Innes/Central areas during the Christchurch City Council LTP 2024-34 decision-making process, for Council to approve an appropriate new budget to build a new ‘Shirley Centre’/relocate Shirley Library & Service Centre, from the Burwood Ward to the Central Ward at 10 Shirley Road, Richmond?

Moving the Shirley Library to the Shirley Community Reserve:
Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Discussions, 11th Sept 2025
Item 9. SCR Proposed Community Facility
Page 11
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/WaipapaPICcbUpdateApril2025JoannaGould.pdf
Can’t justify the expense in moving the Shirley Library to the Shirley Community Reserve.

Matatiki Hornby Centre:
Built: 2024, Size: 3,900m2, Cost: $46M, Hornby Ward
“The newly built Matatiki Hornby Centre, opened in Kyle Park on the 19th April 2024. Work started in November 2021 to build a new indoor pool, library and service centre [4000m²] complex at Kyle Park, on Waterloo Rd.”
https://www.thepress.co.nz/nz-news/350105833/council-still-refuses-release-actual-cost-build-new-hornby-pool-and-library
– The new purpose-built Matatiki Hornby Centre is located 1km from the old Hornby Library at 8 Goulding Avenue.
– ‘Old’ to ‘New’ Location (1km) Google Maps Distance:
https://maps.app.goo.gl/EetbMHFVhVYbK1819
– The current Shirley Library is located 1km from the Shirley Community Reserve.
– ‘Old’ to ‘New’ Location (1km) Google Maps Distance:
https://maps.app.goo.gl/LTGd1FZQJYpUu82t8

Ōmōkihi South Library:
Built: 2026, Size: 2,435m2, Cost: $32M, Cashmere Ward
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/south-library-report/ (08 June 2022)
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/south-library-submission/ (27 July 2022)

Why is the Christchurch City Council able to invest in the residents of Hornby & Beckenham, but not the residents living in the communities around Shirley Road?


8. Christchurch City Libraries
Christchurch City Libraries | Visitor & Issues Stats:
From 2020 to 2026, visitor numbers ranked Shirley Library for a ‘Suburban’ Library:
20/21 = 3rd, 21/22 = 2nd, 22/23 = 1st, 23/24 = 2nd, 24/25 = 3rd, 25/26 = 1st.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/lgoima-request-ticket-1574763/

Christchurch City Libraries | Locations Per Community Board:
Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board
(5 suburban libraries)
– Coastal Ward: Parklands Library & New Brighton Library
– Burwood Ward: Shirley Library, The Palms Mall & Aranui Library
– Linwood Ward: Linwood Library, Eastgate Mall
Waimāero Fendalton-Waimairi-Harewood Community Board
(2 suburban libraries)
– Fendalton Ward: Fendalton Library
– Waimairi Ward:
– Harewood Ward: Ōrauwhata Bishopdale Library and Community Centre
Waipuna Halswell-Hornby-Riccarton Community Board
(3 suburban libraries)
– Halswell Ward: Te Hāpua Halswell Centre
– Hornby Ward: Matatiki Hornby Centre
– Riccarton Ward: Upper Riccarton Library
Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
(2 suburban libraries & Tūranga)
– Papanui Ward: Papanui Library & Redwood Library
– Innes Ward*:
– Central Ward*:
* No suburban library in either Innes or Central Ward.
10 Shirley Road/Shirley ‘Community’ Reserve is on the boundary of both Wards.
Waihoro Spreydon-Cashmere-Heathcote Community Board
(3 suburban libraries)
– Spreydon Ward: Spreydon Library
– Cashmere Ward: South Library
– Heathcote Ward: Matuku Takotako Sumner Centre
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/christchurch-city-libraries-by-community-board/

Christchurch City Libraries | Built Post Earthquakes (List)
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/lgoima-request-ticket-1523989/

LGOIMA [1523989] | Christchurch City Council
Libraries Built Post Earthquakes | 2012 – 2026 (List)

Christchurch City Libraries | Built Post Earthquakes (Per Ward)
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/lgoima-request-ticket-1523989/

LGOIMA [1523989] | Christchurch City Council
Libraries Built Post Earthquakes | 2012 – 2026 (Per Ward)

Christchurch City Libraries | Libraries 2025 Facilities Plan
https://christchurchcitylibraries.com/2025/Libraries2025FacilitiesPlan.pdf
Location Preferences (Page 10)
– Near local shops/supermarket/mall/bank/medical centre/schools/playground/toy library; malls and aquatic facilities not seen as highly desirable areas for co-location or as adjacent locations; co-location with a Council service centre favoured.
– On bus route/near transport hubs; handy walking distance from home; easily accessed, free, plentiful car parking adjacent to library.
– Attractive street visibility.

Christchurch City Libraries | East ‘Suburban’ Libraries:
‘Spot the Difference’: Shirley Library & Aranui Library (Top),
Parklands Library & New Brighton Library (Bottom).
Shirley Library is located in a ‘Commercial Zone’ car park with no outdoor space.
These other East Libraries are ‘destination spaces’ in their communities, with outdoor spaces surrounding their buildings.

Christchurch City Libraries | East ‘Suburban’ Libraries
‘Spot the Difference’: Shirley Library & Aranui Library (Top),
Parklands Library & New Brighton Library (Bottom).

Christchurch City Libraries | Auahatanga – Creative Spaces:
Where everyone can learn, make and design. Our creative and learning spaces welcome everyone.
The purpose of our service is to support prototyping and printing small quantities, as we are a non-commercial organisation.
Locations: Tūranga, Te Hāpua Halswell Centre & Matatiki Hornby Centre.
https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/creative-spaces/


9. Education Providers
Currently we have 14 Education Providers located within a 2km radius of 10 Shirley Road, Shirley Community Reserve:
– 1 High School
– 1 Intermediate School
– 6 Primary Schools
– 2 Special Needs Schools
– 2 Kindergartens &
– 2 Playcentres.

Post Earthquakes School Closures:
7 Schools (3 High Schools, 4 Primary Schools)
Relocated: Shirley Boys’ High School, Avonside Girls’ High School, Marian College & Banks Avenue School.
Closed: Hammersley Park School, Richmond School & St Paul’s School.

Post Earthquakes Adult & Community Education (ACE) Closures:
Shirley Community Centre, Shirley Boys’ High & Floyds Creative Arts Centre.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-centre-community-overview-map/


10. Support Providers
Shirley Community Reserve is centrally located for the following 10 Support Providers, located within a 3km radius of 10 Shirley Road, bringing locals & those travelling from around Christchurch into our communities:
Child Development: Shirley Toy Library & North Parade Plunket (Shirley)
Specialist Teaching: Seabrook McKenzie Centre, Ferndale Te Ahu School & The Champion Centre
Neurodiverse: Autism NZ (Canterbury & West Coast)
Intellectual Disabilities: Helen Anderson Trust & Delta Community Support Trust (Friendship Link)
Pain Management: Burwood Hospital Pain Management Centre
Brain Injury: Laura Fergusson Trust
Older Persons: Delta Community Support Trust (Evergreen Club)
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-centre-community-overview-map/


11. Existing Community Facilities
Shirley Community Reserve is centrally located to connect with our existing Community Centres:
North of the Reserve: MacFarlane Park Centre (MPC) & MacFarlane Park Neighbourhood Centre (MPNC)
South of the Reserve: North Avon Community Centre & Avebury House
West of the Reserve: St Albans Community Centre
This location is also central to our local Community Gardens, Parks & Playgrounds, plus our wide range of local Recreational Facilities.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-centre-community-overview-map/


12. Local Green Spaces
Residents have plenty of opportunities to connect with & utilise the existing local green spaces, through Christchurch City Council parks/walking trails/fruit trees, school grounds, community gardens, birdsong trails, Dudley Creek/Esplanade Reserve & the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/local-green-spaces/


13. Bookable Spaces & Local Activities Available
1. Bookable Spaces
– Christchurch City Libraries Bookable Spaces
https://my.christchurchcitylibraries.com/bookable-spaces/
…including Libraries’ meeting rooms, AV studios and creative spaces. From seminars to music recording, community gatherings to book clubs, we can host them all…
Bookable Spaces available at these libraries (not available at Shirley Library):
Tūranga, Aranui Library, Fendalton Library, Te Hāpua: Halswell Centre, Lyttelton Library, Matatiki Hornby Centre, Matuku Takotako: Sumner Centre, Ōrauwhata: Bishopdale Library and Community Centre, Upper Riccarton Library.
North of the Reserve: MacFarlane Park Community Centres
Park Centre Availability Calendar (scroll down to the bottom for timetable)
https://shirleycommunitytrust.org.nz/venue-hire/
South of the Reserve: Avebury House
https://www.aveburyhouse.co.nz/booking.html
West of the Reserve: St Albans Community Centre
Booking Schedule (scroll down to the bottom for timetable)
https://www.sacc.org.nz/venue-hire

2. Local Activities Available
In September 2024, I researched & created the following ‘Local Activities’ tables, based on the information (at the time) for our existing Community Centres & Shirley Library.

Local Activities | Timetable Coded
This timetable highlights the ‘Activity’ options currently available at our local existing community centres/facilities & Shirley Library:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CommunityCentreTimetableCodedSEPT24.pdf
– Most activities are held between 10am – 2pm.
– Shirley Library is the top ‘Location’ provider for ‘free’ activities.

Local Activities | Activities Coded
This coded timetable highlights the ‘Activity’ options by ‘Age’ currently available at our local existing community centres/facilities & Shirley Library:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CommunityCentreActivitiesCodedSEPT24.pdf
The main type of ‘Activity’ currently provided is physical exercise related:
Gentle Exercise, Saygo – Rowena, Shake It Out, Universal Martial Arts, Pickleball, Yoga with Alison, Zumba with JB, Tai Chi with Roger, Yoga with Tracy, Football Dropin, Kapa Haka, Pilates with Dee, Dance Fitness, Ungu Capoeira, Capoeira Angola, Yoga with Timea, Saygo – Daph, Yoga with Dakota, Walking Group & Social Square Dancing.
There are 4 ‘Activities’ available specifically for the ‘Preschool Age’:
Sparkling Stars, Multicultural Mums & Bubs, Wā Kōrero: Storytimes & Wā Pēpi: Babytimes.
There are 5 ‘Activities’ available specifically for the ‘Junior School Age’:
Dungeon Delvers – Junior, Children’s Gardening Club, Football Dropin, Pippins (Girls) & Code Club.
There are 3 ‘Activities’ available specifically for the ‘Senior School Age’:
Football Dropin, Dungeon Delvers – Senior & Impact Youth.


14. ReVision Youth Friendly Spaces Audits
In 2021, Shirley youth were invited to participate in Youth Audits at 3 locations: Shirley Library, MacFarlane Park Basketball Court & 10 Shirley Road/Shirley Community Reserve.
Many of the issues identified in the Youth Audits for Shirley Library & 10 Shirley Road, could be addressed by creating a new central ‘Community Hub’ at the Shirley Community Reserve, that would complement the existing community facilities in MacFarlane Park & surrounding suburbs.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-youth-audits/

ReVision Youth Friendly Spaces Audit Report | Shirley Library (2021)
The Shirley Library performed below average, in the Youth Friendly Spaces Audit, scoring a total of 64.5% and producing a Net Promoter Score of -50.
The areas young people thought could be improved and gave feedback on was the vibrancy and appeal of the space, the youth corner itself, how they felt generally in the space, and the resourcing.
– The youth space was a key area the young people identified as needing change. Specifically, they wanted to see this space moved to a different area of the library.
Young people don’t want to have a space that is at the back corner of the library.
A young person suggested that they would change the layout to be more obvious where the youth space was and would make it larger.
Another auditor really wanted to have a space that was at the heart of the library and was slightly removed at the same time.
– Another common recommendation that young people felt would make the place livelier would be to add more plants and greenery.
Not only would this create a ‘better vibe’ as one auditor said, but the young people felt that it would make the Shirley Library feel even more homely.
– The suggestion of more chairs and comfy places to sit such as more bean bags etc. was also raised again within this discussion around resourcing.
This highlights a strong consensus that the Shirley Library should have more places for both young people and all library users to sit.
– The young people felt that there could be more toilets available for users in the library and also some gender neutral options that weren’t the disabled toilets.
– When asked if the space reflected their culture many of the young people said that it doesn’t feel multicultural and that they would love to see more Te Ao Māori and Te Reo Māori around the space.
– Young people wanted to feel included in decision making on clubs and activities for them and suggested providing different avenues for them to continue to do this. With this, they also wished to see a greater circulation of young adult books and the Shirley Library to be better resourced with activities and clubs for them.
– A couple of young people highlighted how dark the mall and library car park were and this increased how unsafe they felt leaving the Library.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/youth-audit-shirley-library/

ReVision Youth Friendly Spaces Audit Report | 10 Shirley Road (2021)
10 Shirley Road performed averagely in the Youth Friendly Spaces Audit, scoring a total of 42% and received a poor Net Promoter Score of -37.5.
– The youth auditors really liked how the space is well connected within Shirley.
10 Shirley Road is right in the middle of other spaces local young people would access and is surrounded by bus stops connected to the central network.
– The space has a variety of facilities for young people to use, such as the playground, basketball court, and a quiet space by the stream at the other end of the park.
– They enjoy using the space as it is easily accessible and its activities give them something to do, while making them feel like they belong.
– The areas young people thought could be improved on were the lack of basic amenities in the space and the underutilisation of the space.
– One youth auditor mentioned that Shirley Primary, located across the road, uses the space sometimes, which makes it easier for kids to feel welcome to use the space.
– Overall, it is a nice and safe park, with one auditor even commenting that it was enjoyable for all people, young or old, to use.
– Another idea the auditors raised was to add an information board which includes youth-focused information and advertising.
It should also include contacts to youth services and providers, in both Shirley and neighbouring areas. This will help young people feel comfortable with accessing support and could possibly introduce them to new groups and clubs.
– In the long run, young people would like to see a youth centre or a place where young people can sit down and relax in a sheltered space which protects them from the elements.
– During the day, they mentioned that the space feels safe due to its location on the main road and open areas. However, when dark, the auditors noted that they did not feel the same level of safety.
– Another auditor mentioned that they would feel safe if more people were around.
This could be achieved by adding more seating to attract more users and introducing more activities.
– When asked if they felt ‘in the way’ when at the space, the auditors said that they did not and that they instead felt welcome by its other users; they felt that they were part of the community.
– In terms of new activities, the auditors noted that the table tennis table is not fit for purpose as it is usually too windy to use. Instead, the auditors suggested that a big chess set could be developed, which would be something young people would welcome to the space.
– Any space needs to be accessible, which includes disability access, physical movement to and around the space, and the affordability of engaging with the space.
Young people commented that the space is easily accessible.
– Due to its location on a main road, the space is easy for not just Shirley residents to access, but everyone in the city.
– A traffic light installed right outside the main entrance makes it easier for young people to cross the road, while the bus stops located directly outside the space connect it to the city’s public transport network that many young people rely on.
– With council already planning to build a new structure in the space, the youth auditors agreed that they would like this to be a building that would be a place to both run activities and relax.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/youth-audit-10-shirley-road/


15. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ | Equity and Inclusion
– Read the 2023 Consultation Feedback comments & then ask yourself two questions:
1. What are residents asking for in a new Community Centre building?
2. After seeing the Board approved plans, does the new building match the function & expectations highlighted in our residents comments?
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/2023-consultation-feedback/

– Many residents in the communities around Shirley Road had to deal with insurance claims for their own homes, after the Canterbury earthquakes.
When the insurance claim says: “Replace”, we know from our own experiences, that means “like for like”, the same size building.
We have assumed that when the Christchurch City Council says:
“Replace. Insurance Claim.” regarding our Shirley Community Centre rebuild, we would be getting a new 1,500m2 building.
We didn’t expect to feel ‘short changed’ by the new building plans.
Especially when other communities have received new Community Centres/Libraries before our rebuild, and their new buildings are an ‘upgrade’ in size/amenities, compared to their community facilities pre Canterbury Earthquakes.

– Submission #5452 from the 2023 Consultation said: “The real consultation should be ‘How do We maximise the community use of the rebuilt Center at 10 Shirley Rd’.
That is the starting point in designing a new building that is equitable, inclusive & accessible for the residents in the communities around Shirley Road.

The decision-making process for the new building has not been equitable.
Other Community Boards & Councillors have advocated on behalf of their residents to provide new Community Facilities, that meet the needs of their communities.
While our Community Board & Councillors, made the decision for an “on budget” building.
Knowing that this would limit the size & function of the new building, plus eliminate the Option ‘to incorporate the current Shirley Library’ into the new building.

The Mayor’s Recommendation for CCC Long Term Plan 2021-2031 for ’10 Shirley Rd’ included:
“That the Council reinstates $3.0 million funding formerly set aside for the rebuild of the Shirley Community Centre in FY 2029/30 – FY 2031/32 to enable a subsequent annual plan to bring the funding forward if plans are progressed.
That the Council adds $35,000 in FY 2021/22 for an updated feasibility study to look at other options, including incorporating the current Shirley library.”

The funding for the Shirley Community Centre had previously been removed in 2018.
Funding was ‘reinstated’ in 2021, due to residents & ‘Shirley Road Central’ advocating for the Shirley Library to be ‘incorporated’ in the new building at 10 Shirley Road.

Now the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board have decided this funding is to be used for a significantly smaller ‘traditional’ community centre, that will exclude many of our residents that we have been trying to include in the new building. How is this equitable?

The decision-making process for the new building has not been inclusive.
The Working Party only included representatives from the existing local Community Centres, who have a clear bias & would be unable to give an impartial opinion.
– The residents who have been advocating for the Shirley Community Centre & care about the development of the Shirley Community Reserve, were excluded?
– Children from Shirley Primary School & Shirley Intermediate were invited to share their ideas for the Reserve before the 2023 Consultation, but had no input into the new building?
– Youth were able to share their assessments of the Shirley Library & 10 Shirley Road in 2021, during the ReVision Youth Friendly Spaces audits, yet their opinions aren’t included in the new building design?

The St Albans Community Centre Consultation for their ‘Concept Design’, said ‘Designed by your community for your community.’
The Board was given Delegated Authority for the Shirley Community Centre, based on their decision-making process for this rebuild project.
Yet a ‘Concept Design’ did not go out for Consultation for the Shirley Community Facility, to allow residents to give feedback on their community facility?

Many residents are still unaware that the Board has approved plans for a new building, as they don’t follow the Board’s meetings or read ‘The Press’ articles, which are now behind a paywall restricting access.

The Board have missed vital steps in bringing the community along in this rebuild journey, of their well used & loved Community Centre.

The Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board have jumped from asking the community whether they want:
a ‘recreational space’, ‘community hub’ or ‘leave the space as is’…
to here is the building we designed for you, without you…surprise!

Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board Approved Plans
Hint: when you design a 280m2 building with the main features being:
the number of toilets and external doors…6!
You know you have got the function & design of the building wrong!

The CCC Equity and Inclusion Policy is intended to:
“Inform Council decision-making and investment, including grant funding and procurement &
Apply an equity, access and inclusion lens over all Council services.”
How does the Board’s approved plans align with the Policy’s definitions for: Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility?

I’ve highlighted some of the issues I see, in my ‘Written Submission’s at the following links:
– Shirley Community Facility Plan v1:
Blog Post: https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-community-facility-plan-v1/
Written Submission by Joanna Gould:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/WaipapaPICItem8ShirleyCommunityFacilitySept2025JoannaGould.pdf
– Shirley Community Facility Plan v2:
Blog Post: https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-community-facility-plan-v2/
Written Submission by Joanna Gould:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/WaipapaPICItem9ShirleyCommunityFacilityDec2025JoannaGould.pdf

Facility Decision-making

1. ‘Shirley Community Centre’ Rebuild History
2. Delegated Authority for the ‘Shirley Community Centre’ (2016)
3. ‘St Albans Community Centre’ Rebuild Process
4. Mayor’s Recommendations for CCC Long Term Plans
5. Prior Community Board Proposals
6. Christchurch City Council Delegations Register
7. Updated Feasibility Study (2023)
8. Co-Studio Architects Plans (2025)
9. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Working Party
10. Waipapa P-I-C Community Board: Deputations
11. Waipapa P-I-C Community Board: Consultation
12. Waipapa P-I-C Community Board: Updates


1. ‘Shirley Community Centre’ Rebuild History
The Shirley Community Centre at 10 Shirley Road/Shirley Community Reserve, Richmond was demolished in 2012, after the Canterbury Earthquakes.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-community-centre-decision-making/

Email to the Department of Conservation | 17th Sept 2025
Re: Shirley Community Reserve, 10 Shirley Road, Richmond, Christchurch
Reserve Classification & Uses
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/email-to-the-department-of-conservation-17th-sept-2025/


2. Delegated Authority for the ‘Shirley Community Centre’ (2016)
In 2016, the Christchurch City Council gave Delegated Authority for the ‘rebuild of the Shirley Community Centre’* to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board.
* “process similar to that put in place by the Council for the rebuild of the St Albans Community Centre be followed.”

Item 12. Proposed Shirley Community Centre Rebuild Request for Delegated Authority (31 August 2016)
Pages 91-92
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2016/09/CNCL_20160908_AGN_480_AT.PDF
Report from Shirley/Papanui Community Board – 31 August 2016
At their meeting of 31 August 2016 the Shirley/Papanui Community Board considered a process for the rebuild of the Shirley Community Centre.
The Council has allocated funding of $2.57 million to cover the capital costs of the rebuild of the Shirley Community Centre.
This project is in Tranche 1 of the Community Facilities Rebuild Programme.
– Information from the Project Manager indicates a timeframe of around 18-24 months from approval of the concept design through to the opening of the new facility as well as the time needed for the consultation process.
– Initial consultation with the Shirley community by the Shirley/Papanui Community Development Advisers regarding the rebuild of a facility in Shirley has already started and will continue until 17 November to be followed by a community conversation.
– This information will assist with determining a draft concept plan for the Community Centre.
The Board wishes to proceed with this project and suggests that a process similar to that put in place by the Council for the rebuild of the St Albans Community Centre be followed.
Accordingly the Board requests that delegated authority for decision-making around the Shirley Community Centre project be given by the Council, including the delegation of authority to make decisions from the recommendations of the Working Party and from staff for the siting, design and rebuild process and future management of the facility.
The Board agreed at their meeting that:
– Terms of Reference, similar to those developed for the St Albans Community Centre rebuild process will be developed for this project and will be considered for approval by the Papanui/Innes Community Board at the start of the next electoral term.
– The formation of any Working Party and the arrangements for any first meeting will also be delayed until the start of the next electoral term.
– The decision as to the site of the new Shirley Community Centre will also be made by the Papanui/Innes Community Board in the next electoral term.

Item 12. Proposed Shirley Community Centre Rebuild Request for Delegated Authority (8 September 2016)
Page 5
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2016/09/CNCL_20160908_MIN_480.PDF
Council Resolved CNCL/2016/00368
That the Council:
1. Delegates the necessary authority (as per the St Albans Community facility) to the Shirley/Papanui Community Board (to be the Papanui/Innes Community Board in the next term) for decisions regarding the rebuild and future management of the Shirley Community Centre at either 10 Shirley Road or any other selected site.
2. Request that the Community Board talk with staff around potential options for a regeneration plan in this area under the Greater Christchurch Regeneration Act 2016.
Councillor Cotter/Councillor Livingstone, Carried

The Shirley/Papanui Community Board were given by Council, the Delegated Authority “for decisions regarding the rebuild and future management of the Shirley Community Centre” ten years ago.

15 years after the Canterbury Earthquakes, our communities around Shirley Road are still waiting for a new building to be built, with very little progress achieved by the Board over the last ten years.


3. ‘St Albans Community Centre’ Rebuild Process
The Board has not followed a “similar process put in place by the Council for the rebuild of the St Albans Community Centre”:
Community Meeting, Terms of Reference, Draft Concept Design, Consultation, Drop-in Sessions, Amended Concept Design, Approved Concept Design, before going out to GETS for: Expressions of Interest (EOI) & Request for Tender (RFT).

Christchurch City Council ‘Have Your Say’ Consultation, May 2016
Proposed New St Albans Community Centre
Designed by your community for your community
https://ccc.govt.nz/assets/Documents/The-Council/HYS/2016/may/Consultation-PIL-St-Albans-Community-Centre.pdf
Following feedback from the community, the Shirley-Papanui Community Board worked alongside staff and a community workshop was held on 9 September 2014.
A new working party was established by the Shirley-Papanui Community Board in November 2015.
Since then, this group and Council staff have been working together and now have a concept design for feedback from the wider community.
Consultation: 27th May 2016 – 20th June 2016
Feedback letter to Submitters: June 2016
Community Board Approval: July 2106
Construction (subject to approvals): 2017

‘St Albans Community Centre consultation begins’, 25th May 2016
https://www.newsline.ccc.govt.nz/news/story/st-albans-community-centre-consultation-begins
The local community will be able to discuss how they think the new community centre could enhance St Albans, and how they see themselves using the facility, before the final design is approved by the Shirley–Papanui Community Board.
The current design concept has been developed by the community, alongside Christchurch City Council and the St Albans Community Centre Working Party…
Mike Davidson, chair of the Shirley–Papanui Community Board, says the Board is excited with the development and progress of the new centre and is looking forward to the design going out for public consultation…
The working party was established by the Shirley–Papanui Community Board in November 2015.
The party consists of representatives from the St Albans Residents Association, St Albans School, Edgeware Business Association, St Albans Pavilion and Pool Group, a youth representative and representatives of the Shirley–Papanui Community Board.
“Using information from both pre- and post-earthquake, a design has been created that truly captures the essence of St Albans.
This group has worked with Council staff to create a concept design, which is now ready for feedback from the wider community.” Mr Davidson says.
There will be two drop-in sessions at the transitional St Albans Community Centre, 1049 Colombo Street for the public to come and meet the working party and discuss the project.

‘St Albans Community Centre plans progressing’, 10th April 2017
https://www.newsline.ccc.govt.nz/news/story/st-albans-community-centre-plans-progressing

Waipapa/Papanui-Innes Community Board, 26th October 2018
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2018/10/PICB_20181026_AGN_2443_AT.PDF
– 7. St Albans Community Centre – Final Floor Plan (Page 14)
– 15. Papanui-Innes Community Board Area Report – October 2018
4.3.3 St Albans Community Facility (Page 83)
The St Albans Community Facility Working Party met on 15 October for their last meeting. The Working Party agreed to the amended design and recommended that the Papanui-Innes Community Board move forward with the project as per the briefing received earlier in this meeting.

‘Design unveiled for St Albans Community Centre’, 15th May 2019
https://www.newsline.ccc.govt.nz/news/story/design-unveiled-for-st-albans-community-centre

GETS Expressions of Interest (EOI) for St Albans Community Centre Construction, 22nd February 2019
https://www.gets.govt.nz/CCC/ExternalTenderDetails.htm?id=20685053

GETS Request for Tender (RFT) for Construction of St Albans Community Centre, 4th June 2019
https://www.gets.govt.nz/CCC/ExternalTenderDetails.htm?id=21004890

‘Celebrations as new community centre opens in St Albans’, 11th April 2021
https://www.newsline.ccc.govt.nz/news/story/celebrations-as-new-community-centre-opens-in-st-albans


4. Mayor’s Recommendations for CCC Long Term Plans
By the beginning of 2018, the funding for the new Shirley Community Centre had been ‘Removed from Programme’, from the CCC Community Facilities Rebuild Programme.
“The Papanui-Innes Community Board has take the rare step of starting a petition to fight the city council over funding.”

In May 2018, after my 1st verbal submission to Council for the Draft Long Term Plan 2018-2028, Former Mayor Lianne Dalziel’s recommendations:

Mayor’s Recommendation for CCC Long Term Plan 2018-2028
Page 6
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2018/06/CLTP_20180622_MIN_2843_AT.PDF
8. Funding new and existing community facilities
a. That the Council requests staff to complete the Community Facilities Network Plan as soon as practicable…Potential developments include but are not limited to; the Shirley Community Centre*

* Staff directed to engage external independent consultants for:
– ‘Community Needs Analysis for Richmond’, December 2018 &
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Richmond-Community-Needs-Analysis-Report.pdf
– ‘Shirley Community Centre Feasibility and Business Case’, 8th August 2019
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Shirley_Community_Centre_Feasibility_Report_and_Business_Case_August_2019.pdf

I was interviewed by both external independent consultants for these reports.
My submissions since 2018 are included here:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/joanna-gould-submissions/

Mayor’s Recommendation for CCC Long Term Plan 2021-2031
Page 25
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2021/06/C-LTP_20210621_MIN_5408_AT.PDF
M8: 10 Shirley Rd*
M8A: That the Council reinstates $3.0 million funding formerly set aside for the rebuild of the Shirley Community Centre in FY 2029/30 – FY 2031/32 to enable a subsequent annual plan to bring the funding forward if plans are progressed.
M8B: That the Council adds $35,000 in FY 2021/22 for an updated feasibility study to look at other options, including incorporating the current Shirley library.**
** Staff directed to provide an updated feasibility study in FY 2021/22.

* Members of ‘Shirley Road Central’ presented the ‘Where is our Community Centre’ petition to Council during the 2021 verbal submission hearings:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/where-is-our-community-centre-petition/

Christchurch City Council | Draft Long Term Plan 2021-2031
‘Shirley Road Central’ verbal submission by Jennifer Dalziel & Joanne Byrne

Shirley Community Reserve Memo, 10th June 2022
Page 97
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2022/06/PICB_20220617_AGN_7648_AT.PDF
4.3 A feasibility study is currently underway to estimate the construction costs for four potential options for a new community facility.
1. Mixed use hub incorporating a library, service centre, and community operated community space,
2. Community operated large community facilities building,
3. Community operated small community facilities building,
4. Outdoor options similar to Dallington landing.


5. Prior Community Board Proposals
– Crossway Church Proposal, 2016
From 2013 to 2016, “staff explored options for a third-party funded and managed facility”, which was eventually rejected.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/crossway-church-proposal/

– CCC Draft LTP 2024-34 Workshops, May 2024
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/ccc-draft-ltp-2024-34-workshops/
Proposed amendment by Councillor Pauline Cotter.
“Staff are through the Board Chair [Emma Norrish] currently negotiating with a ‘prospective Community Partner’ [‘Shirley Road Central’*] and a ‘sympathetic Building Company’ [Property Developer] to develop this facility in a Community Partnership through the Build and the Operation.”

* ‘Shirley Road Central’ Constitution: “To support the development of a community hub including a modern library, and meeting rooms on the site at 10 Shirley Road for the use of the surrounding communities.”
‘Shirley Road Central’ were advocating for a ‘contemporary’ community centre/Citizen Hub, not a ‘traditional’ community centre.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-road-central-group/


6. Christchurch City Council Delegations Register
Page 97 & 98
https://ccc.govt.nz/assets/Documents/The-Council/How-the-Council-works/Delegations-Register/Delegations-Register.pdf

Community Facilities
1. To approve site selection and to approve the final design of new local community facilities (for example community halls, volunteer libraries, club rooms, public toilets).
Limits:
– This power may not be sub-delegated.
– Any financial decisions are subject to the maximum of what is approved in the current LTP/Annual Plan and associated cost centre budgets.
This delegation does not include community facilities that have network or citizen hub implications.
For example swimming pools, libraries, and multi-use service centres
.
2. To approve alterations and additions to the design of existing local community facilities (for example community halls, volunteer libraries, club rooms, public toilets).
Limits:
– This power may not be sub-delegated.
– Any financial decisions are subject to the maximum of what is approved in the current LTP/Annual Plan and associated cost centre budgets.
This delegation does not include community facilities that have network or citizen hub implications.
For example swimming pools, libraries, and multi-use service centres
.
3. To the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board authority to make decisions regarding the rebuild and future management of the Shirley Community Centre at either 10 Shirley Road or any other selected site.

Landscape development plans for parks and reserves
1. Approve and adopt any new landscape development plans for parks and reserves provided the design is within the policy and budget set by the Council.
Limits: This power may not be sub-delegated.
2. Approve the location of, and construction of, or alteration or addition to, any structure or area on parks and reserves provided the matter is within the policy and budget set by the Council.
Limits: This power may not be sub-delegated.


7. Updated Feasibility Study (2023)
Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board, 13th June 2024
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2024/06/PCBCC_20240613_AGN_9127_AT.PDF
Item. 9. Shirley Community Reserve: Proposed Community Facility
Pages 29 – 39, Council Staff Report
Page 40, ‘Shirley Community Reserve Feasibility Study’ Memo
Page 42 – 81, ‘Shirley Community Reserve Feasibility Study’ by Sylvia Docherty for Christchurch City Council*

* 15. Glossary (Page 81)
Hub:
Co-locating multiple services the Council provides across the community in a common location, enabling the customer and community experience to be an integrated one.
Initially this includes libraries, and service desks.
Shirley Library and Service Centre is an example.

‘Shirley Community Reserve’ Consultation (2023)
https://letstalk.ccc.govt.nz/SCR
The options that we’ve developed take into consideration feedback received by the Shirley community in 2020, as well as what we’ve seen works well around Ōtautahi Christchurch. These options include:
– A recreation space with a full basketball court, renewed playground, planting, a picnic and BBQ area, a community garden and a walkway.
Creating a community hub that’s open to partnerships with local organisations.
– Leaving the space as it is.


8. Co-Studio Architects Plans
‘Shirley Community Facility’ Plans:
– 28th March 2025 | Concept/Preliminary Design 100%
– 9th July 2025 | 100% Developed Design
– 20th August 2025 | Issued for Information
– 1st September 2025 | 100% Detailed Design
– 10th November 2025 | 100% Detailed Design

The ‘Concept/Preliminary Design’ plan had already been created, before the first meeting of the ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Working Party in April 2025.


9. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Working Party
For background info see:
‘2. Working Party | Members, Role & 2023 Consultation Feedback from the Working Party members’
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/new-building-updates/

Working Party Members:
– Shirley Community Trust (MacFarlane Park Centres)
– Shirley Village Project
– St Albans Residents Association (Kohinga St Albans Community Centre)
– Eastern Community Sport and Recreation Inc (Avon Hub)
– We are Richmond (Avebury House).

The Working Party did not include:
– Shirley Playcentre (located on the Reserve)**
– Shirley Primary School (located opposite the Reserve)**
** The current plan has halved onsite car parking at the Reserve, which will affect these car park users.
– Shirley Recreational Walkers (meet at the Reserve)
– Canterbury Genealogy (formerly NZ Society of Genealogists – Canterbury Branch. Located at 10 Shirley Road from February 1990 until the February 2011 earthquakes. Now located at Parkview Community Lounge, with drop-in sessions at Shirley Library on the first and third Saturdays of each month.)
– Community Advocates or
– Residents from the communities around Shirley Road.

The Working Party met 3 times: April, June & July 2025.

Q. What are their roles in the Working Party, design & build process of the new building?
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/lgoima-request-ticket-1323259/
– Discuss and provide feedback on the development concept and any other relevant documentation relating to the project.
Raise the profile of the project and provide a channel of communication so that the wider community feels confident, informed, and engaged about the project and the progress being made.
– Work as a team to achieve the overall goal of the project.
Provide recommendations, and suggestions to the Project Team to ensure that the design meets the needs of the community.
– Act as a conduit between Council and the Community to inform the development of the facility and park space.

“3.7 The endorsement of the Working Group was not unanimous.
– Four members endorsed the plans,
– Two members did not endorse the plans, and
– Two members of the Working Group were not present.”
Page 27
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/09/PCBCC_20250911_AGN_9141_AT.PDF

The ‘Concept/Preliminary Design’ nor the ‘100% Detailed Design’ plans were not made public, until the ‘Developed design’ plans were included in the agenda for the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board meeting on the 11th September 2025:
Item. 8. Shirley Community Facility
Attachments
A – Shirley Community Facility – Developed design
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/09/PCBCC_20250911_AGN_9141_AT_WEB.htm


10. Waipapa P-I-C Community Board: Deputations
Deputations were allowed at the 11th September 2025 Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board meeting, but not at the 11th December 2025 meeting, where the Board approved the final design for the ‘Shirley Community Facility’.
– 11th September 2025:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-community-facility-plan-v1/
– 11th December 2025:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-community-facility-plan-v2/

Item. 5. Deputations by Appointment
https://www.youtube.com/live/4cCkAA7KvZg?si=xU09YWM8HoBE6ww4&t=1395s
5.3. Jennifer Dalziel*
5.4. Margaret Stewart*
5.5. Joanna Gould*
5.6. Don Gould*
5.7. Jo Byrne*
5.8. We are Richmond and Shirley Community Trust
* All former members of ‘Shirley Road Central’.
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/09/PCBCC_20250911_MIN_9141_AT_WEB.htm


11. Waipapa P-I-C Community Board: Consultation
At no stage in the process of developing the ‘Shirley Community Facility’, has there been a Consultation on the ‘Concept’, ‘Developed Design’ or ‘Detailed Design’, to allow the whole community to give feedback on their community facility.
Residents haven’t been consulted by the Board since the 2023 Consultation, with the options for the Shirley ‘Community’ Reserve:
– Recreational Space,
– Community Hub, or
– Leave the Space as is.

Email Update to Waipapa P-I-C Community Board
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/email-to-the-waipapa-p-i-c-community-board-12th-april-2025/
During my verbal submission for the Christchurch City Council Draft Annual Plan 2025-2026, I received the following question from Deputy Mayor/Innes Ward Councillor Pauline Cotter:
“You probably need to, because the community board has now embarked on the process, set up a working group and everything, to follow that decision they made to do 50% green space 50% centre, which means the centre will be smaller than the old one, you probably need to take that back through to the community board if you’re disputing the data.”
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/WaipapaPICcbUpdateApril2025JoannaGould.pdf
I received no reply from the Board or Councillor Pauline Cotter.
Reply from Ali Jones, Innes Ward Member (13th June 2025)
“My apologies for not responding to your email Joanna.
I totally missed it. I’ll take a look now.
Pauline, should this be included in correspondence to the board?”
My email was not included as ‘Correspondence’ in the Board’s meeting agenda.


12. Waipapa P-I-C Community Board: Updates
– Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes for 11th December 2025
Pages 4-6
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/12/PCBCC_20251211_MIN_10741_AT.PDF

Item. 9. Updated Shirley Community Facility Design Voting:
– For (6): Pauline Cotter, Jake McLellan, Dr Sunita Gautam, John Miller, Mike Davidson, Simon Britten
– Against (1): Emma Twaddell
– Abstain (2): Ashleigh Feary, Victoria Henstock
TOTAL = 9

– GETS Expressions of Interest (EOI) for Shirley Community Facility, 3rd February 2026
https://www.gets.govt.nz/CCC/ExternalTenderDetails.htm?id=33289900

– Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board Meeting Agenda, 13th April 2026
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2026/04/PCBCC_20260413_AGN_11311_AT_WEB.htm
Actions Register: Updated Shirley Community Facility Design
Meeting Date: 11 December 2025, Due Date: 12 March 2026
Unit: Professional & Technical Serv, Team: Project Management

CCC Draft Annual Plan 2026-2027

1. Written Submission (.pdf) by Joanna Gould
2. AI Summary of Written Submission (.pdf)
3. Blog Post Links (included in the .pdf)
4. LGOIMA Info Links (included in the .pdf)
5. Verbal Submission by Joanna Gould (YouTube video)
6. Verbal Submission by Joanna Gould (Presentation)
7. Verbal Submission by Joanna Gould (Transcript)
8. Verbal Submission by Joanna Gould (Councillors Questions)
– Councillor Tyla Harrison-Hunt (Riccarton Ward)
– Councillor Pauline Cotter (Innes Ward)
Includes background info on the following:
– ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Working Party
– ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Plans from Co-Studio Architects
– Lack of Community Input (Re: Deputations & No Consultation)
9. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Budget Allocated & Budget Spent


1. Written Submission (.pdf) by Joanna Gould
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/CCCDraftAnnualPlanMarch2026JoannaGould.pdf

Written Submission (.pdf) includes the following:
1. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Plan v1
2. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Plan v2
3. Shirley Community Reserve Landscape Plans
4. Community Changes
5. Community Needs
6. Community Developments
7. Christchurch City Council
8. Christchurch City Libraries
9. Shirley Library
10. ‘Shirley Centre’ Community Overview Map
11. ‘Shirley Centre’ Vision
12. ‘Gateway to the East’


2. AI Summary of Written Submission (.pdf)
Project No. 20053 – Shirley Community Facility
“The document outlines a submission to the Christchurch City Council’s Draft Annual Plan 2026-2027, focusing on the proposed Shirley Community Facility at 10 Shirley Road. Below are the key points:

1. Advocacy for the ‘Shirley Centre’ ​
Proposal to establish a new Shirley Library and Information Centre at 10 Shirley Road. ​
The facility aims to serve as a community hub, connecting surrounding suburbs (Shirley, Dallington, Richmond, Edgeware, St Albans, and Mairehau). ​
The vision includes creating an inclusive, accessible space for community education, support services, learning spaces, meeting rooms, and recreational activities. ​

2. Reallocation of Funding ​
Suggestion to cancel the 2025 Board-approved plans for a 280m² building and reallocate the 2026 funding to the Long-Term Plan (LTP) 2027.
Proposal to increase the budget to replace the original 1,500m² building. ​
Concerns raised by elected board members about the current design, including security issues, lack of community input, and unclear management plans. ​

3. Collaboration
Recommendation to involve both the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board and the Waitai Coastal-Burwood-Linwood Community Board in decision-making. ​
Suggestion to include stakeholders like Christchurch City Libraries, Shirley Playcentre, Shirley Primary School, and community advocates in discussions. ​
Proposal to remove the delegated authority from the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board for decisions regarding the facility. ​

4. Community Needs
Highlights socio-economic deprivation in the surrounding wards (Innes, Central, and Burwood). ​
Emphasizes the need for community facilities to address the lack of accessible spaces for education, recreation, and social services. ​
Notes the impact of housing intensification and NZ Post location closures on the area.

5. Shirley Library
Criticism of the current Shirley Library’s location in a commercial zone with no outdoor space and inadequate facilities. ​
Proposal to create a “Learning Library” with dedicated learning spaces, meeting rooms, and community-focused amenities. ​

6. Shirley Community Reserve ​
The site of the former Shirley Community Centre has been underutilized since its demolition in 2012. ​
Proposal to transform the reserve into a vibrant community hub with inclusive facilities, recreational spaces, and educational resources. ​

7. ‘Gateway to the East’ Vision ​
Positioning 10 Shirley Road as a key entry point to the eastern suburbs and the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor. ​
Plans to integrate the facility with local history, green spaces, recreational areas, and transport routes. ​
Emphasis on creating a welcoming and informative space for both residents and visitors. ​

8. Community Feedback and Concerns ​
Mixed reactions from residents about the current proposed design, with some calling it “not fit for purpose.” ​
Concerns about the size, functionality, and management of the proposed building. ​
Lack of community consultation and exclusion of certain advocates from the decision-making process. ​

9. Proposed Features for the Shirley Centre ​
Inclusive accessible building with learning spaces, meeting rooms, and community education services. ​
Outdoor spaces including a sensory garden, playground, basketball court, and recreational areas. ​
Integration with local history, green spaces, and the Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor. ​

10. Call to Action
The submission urges the Council to reconsider the current plans, reallocate funding, and involve more stakeholders in the decision-making process to ensure the facility meets community needs. ​

The document emphasizes the importance of creating a community-focused, inclusive, and functional space at 10 Shirley Road to serve as a hub for the surrounding neighborhoods and visitors.” ​


3. Blog Post Links (included in the .pdf)
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-centre-community-overview-map/
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-community-facility-plan-v1/
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-community-facility-plan-v2/
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-centre-post-earthquakes-map/


4. LGOIMA Info Links (included in the .pdf)
LGOIMA Request | Ticket 1467939
Re: Landscape Plans for Shirley Community Reserve
LGOIMA Request | Ticket 1522533
Re: Lancaster Park Community Centre and Changing Rooms
LGOIMA Request | Ticket 1523989
Re: Community Facilities Built Post Earthquakes
LGOIMA Request | Ticket 1568772
Re: South Library Build Cost
LGOIMA Request | Ticket 1574763
Re: Christchurch City Libraries Visitor & Issues Stats
LGOIMA Request | Ticket 1574538
Re: 20053 Shirley Community Centre/Facility Rebuild


5. Verbal Submission by Joanna Gould (YouTube video)

Christchurch City Council | Draft Annual Plan 2026/27
Verbal Submission by Joanna Gould | YouTube video | 7th April 2026

6. Verbal Submission by Joanna Gould (Presentation)

Christchurch City Council | Draft Annual Plan 2026/27
Verbal Submission by Joanna Gould | Presentation | 7th April 2026

The above image was on screen during my verbal submission:
1. Shirley ‘Community’ Reserve (left image)
– Former building located on the Reserve site
– Map of Christchurch highlighting the most earthquake damaged Wards in Red.
2. ‘Shirley Centre’ Post Earthquakes Map (middle image)
– Community Facilities built post earthquakes, highlighting the gap between St Albans and Aranui.
No community facilities have been built in the most earthquake damaged areas.
3. ‘The Press’ article from 15th September 2025 (right image)
– ‘Crappy room with a couple of toilets’ – residents divided over community centre.


7. Verbal Submission by Joanna Gould (Transcript)

“Good afternoon
Everyone knows following the earthquakes, the Wards most affected by damage, were located in the North East of Christchurch, as highlighted in red area on the first map on screen.

But does everyone know what community facilities have been built since 2012 & where they are located?

I didn’t. So the second map on screen, is based on my Official Information request, regarding the Community Facilities Built post earthquakes.

I created this map using Google My Maps, where you can search for an address, it zooms in to this location & you have the option to add a marker.

When I zoomed out to see the whole of Christchurch, I was shocked to see that from St Albans to Aranui, there had been no community facilities built, in the most damaged areas in the North East.
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/shirley-centre-post-earthquakes-map/

The Equity and Inclusion Policy was adopted by Council in 2024.
I made a submission & attended the Hearing Panel meetings.
The Policy details include:
– We will use an equity, access and inclusion lens to inform decision-making to avoid discrimination, promote inclusion and increase fairness in the city, wherever possible.
– As an organisation with resource, influence, and authority, using this lens means that our decisions do not create or perpetuate further inequities.

The last remaining project in the original Rebuild Programme is the Shirley Community Centre.

Since 2018, I have been advocating for a new Shirley Centre, to relocate Shirley Library to Shirley Road, in the Shirley Community Reserve.

According to Council staff:
what I proposed was not considered a viable option.

As the options presented to the Board:
– aligned with what was budgeted for in the LTP
– no request has been made by the Board or by a Councillor to increase the LTP budgeted fund for a future facility.

In 2025, our Board approved plans for an ‘on budget’ 280m2 building to ‘replace’ our former 1,500m2 centre.
As The Press article on screen said: ‘Crappy room with a couple of toilets’.

If the Shirley Community Reserve
– was your Crown owned land, in your ward,
– that was set apart as a Local Purpose reserve,
– with the primary purpose to be a Community Centre,
– knowing the needs of your community,
– seeing your residents repeatedly make submissions &
– present a petition with over 1,200 signatures.
Would you endorse this plan?

When it doesn’t align with:
– the Reserve’s classification,
– the Equity & Inclusion Policy
– Nor the Best Practice Community Facility Design, included in the Community Facilities Network Plan.

Please support my call to:
– Cancel the plan, reallocate & increase the LTP budget for the Shirley Centre.
– Remove the Delegated Authority &
– Start discussions with both Boards & other stakeholders that were excluded from the decision-making process.
– Advocate for the Shirley Centre, library & information centre on Shirley Road, as the Gateway to the East.

Otherwise, if this plan gets built, you as the Council, are literally ripping up the Equity and Inclusion Policy, for the residents in the communities around the Shirley Community Reserve.”


8. Verbal Submission by Joanna Gould (Councillors Questions)

Councillor Tyla Harrison-Hunt (Riccarton Ward)
– Councillor Harrison-Hunt: I remember you in the hearing…
(Councillor Tyla Harrison-Hunt was on the Hearings Panel for the Draft Equity and Inclusion Policy:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/ccc-equity-and-inclusion-policy/).
Please forgive me if I forgot, but did you have a child that used to go to Tūranga?
– Joanna: Yes.
– Councillor Harrison-Hunt: Just in terms of the facility itself, you’ve talked about the space etc.
I’m more worried about the wider scope within the Equity and Inclusion, things we want to think about.
What within this current plan is sort of inaccessible?
– Joanna: The current plan excludes the majority of the community.
Our community is low income. They’re not going to be able to hire out this space.
The space is basically going to be a venue for hire.
It’s not got a current operator. So it’s basically going to be a swipe card access. That’s not inclusive.
The equity is that we had a 1,500m2 building.
This doesn’t replace what we lost.
– Councillor Harrison-Hunt: I see.
– Joanna: My idea is to bring [relocate] the Shirley Library, because it’s the busiest suburban library.
We don’t have spaces in the library for people to sit. There’s no outdoor space.
There’s no learning spaces. So, anytime there’s an activity like in the school holidays, they have to move bookshelves to put in [setup] spaces. The area is basically out of bounds for anybody who’s not participating in that activity.
– Councillor Harrison-Hunt: I know what you mean. Thank you.

Councillor Pauline Cotter (Innes Ward)
– Councillor Cotter: It’s just the Community Board did approve this design after a lot of backwards and forwards and tweaking it.
So now all the three rooms have got their own access way to make it accessible and reasonable for people to hire.
It’s about to start being built. So there’s a lot of money already gone into this.
What’s your view on the sunk capital that we would lose if we didn’t…
– Joanna: You didn’t include the right people in the decision-making.
As far as I’m concerned, that is your loss, because you had the opportunity to invite the people who should have been in the working party.
You only included people who were involved in the existing community centres.
Of course, they’re going to opt for the lowest possible build.
They’ve got a bias.
– Councillor Cotter: Thanks for coming in. That is your view and I can assure listeners and other Councillors around the table that is not the case. It was a really inclusive project.*

* ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Working Party:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/lgoima-request-ticket-1323259/
Working Party Members:
– Shirley Community Trust (MacFarlane Park Centres)
– Shirley Village Project
– St Albans Residents Association (Kohinga St Albans Community Centre)
– Eastern Community Sport and Recreation Inc (Avon Hub)
– We are Richmond (Avebury House).

The Working Party did not include:
– Shirley Playcentre (located on the Reserve)**
– Shirley Primary School (located opposite the Reserve)**
** The current plan has halved onsite car parking at the Reserve.
– Shirley Recreational Walkers (meet at the Reserve)
– Canterbury Genealogy (formerly NZ Society of Genealogists – Canterbury Branch. Located at 10 Shirley Road from February 1990 until the February 2011 earthquakes. Now located at Parkview Community Lounge, with drop-in sessions at Shirley Library on the first and third Saturdays of each month.)
– Community Advocates or
– Residents from the communities around Shirley Road.

The Working Party met 3 times: April, June & July 2025.

Council said the ‘role of the Working Party’ was to:
– Raise the profile of the project and provide a channel of communication so that the wider community feels confident, informed, and engaged about the project and the progress being made.
– Provide recommendations, and suggestions to the Project Team to ensure that the design meets the needs of the community.
– Act as a conduit between Council and the Community to inform the development of the facility and park space.
In my opinion, this has not been achieved.

‘Shirley Community Facility’ Plans from Co-Studio Architects:
– Concept/Preliminary Design 100%, 28th March 2025
– 100% Developed Design, 9th July 2025
– Issued for Information, 20th August 2025
– 100% Detailed Design, 1st September 2025
– 100% Detailed Design, 10th November 2025

Lack of Community Input (Re: Deputations & No Consultation):
The ‘100% Detailed Design’ plans were not made public, until they were included in the agenda for the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board meeting on the 11th September 2025.
https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/09/PCBCC_20250911_AGN_9141_AT_WEB.htm

Deputations were allowed at the 11th September 2025 meeting, but not at the 11th December 2025 meeting, where the Board approved the final design.

At no stage in the process of developing the ‘Shirley Community Facility’, has there been a Consultation on the ‘Concept’, ‘Developed Design’ or ‘Detailed Design’, to allow the whole community to give feedback on their community facility.


9. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Budget Allocated & Budget Spent
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/lgoima-request-ticket-1574538/
Budget Spent – Year, Amount, Item Description
– FY 2025 = $110,000
Planning, Procurement, Investigations, Design.
– FY 2026 = $247,000
Research, Design, Iterations, Construction.
– Current Total Spent = $357,000

LGOIMA [1574538] | 20053 – Shirley Community Centre/Facility Rebuild
Budget Allocated & Budget Spent

In my opinion, both Feasibility Studies & Consultations, plus the Geotechnical reports, were needed to enable the Board to make informed decisions.

Councillor Pauline Cotter referred to ‘sunk capital’, during my verbal submission.
The Board have previously ‘sunk capital’ into the failed ‘Crossway Church’ proposal from 2013 to 2016:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/crossway-church-proposal/

The only ‘sunk capital’ that I see, is the cost of the current ‘Developed’ & ‘Detailed Design’ plans, that led to the procurement costs.

Many residents in the communities around Shirley Road (Shirley, Dallington, Richmond, Edgeware, St Albans & Mairehau) are unaware of the Board’s current plans for 10 Shirley Road/Shirley Community Reserve, as they have not been consulted since 2023…

I’ve been following the Board’s progress for the ‘Shirley Community Centre’ rebuild since 2018.
I read the Board’s agenda for each meeting, to make sure I keep up to date with the Board’s progress regarding this capital project.
I was not included in the ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Working Party, so I had to wait to see the proposed plans.
I voiced my concerns regarding these plans, emailing the Board my .pdf submissions for both the 11th September 2025 & 11th December 2025 Board meetings.
Since the Board approved plans, I’ve been doing more research & preparation in order to provide Council with the information I did, for the current Draft Annual Plan 2026-2027.

The Board could have avoided the current ‘sunk capital’, if the:
– ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Working Party, included all stakeholders &
– ‘Concept/Preliminary Design’ had gone out for Consultation, like they did during the ‘St Albans Community Centre’ rebuild process:
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/facility-decision-making/

‘St Albans Community Centre consultation begins’, 25th May 2016
https://www.newsline.ccc.govt.nz/news/story/st-albans-community-centre-consultation-begins
The local community will be able to discuss how they think the new community centre could enhance St Albans, and how they see themselves using the facility, before the final design is approved by the Shirley–Papanui Community Board
Mike Davidson, chair of the Shirley–Papanui Community Board, says the Board is excited with the development and progress of the new centre and is looking forward to the design going out for public consultation
“Using information from both pre- and post-earthquake, a design has been created that truly captures the essence of St Albans.
This group has worked with Council staff to create a concept design, which is now ready for feedback from the wider community.” Mr Davidson says.
There will be two drop-in sessions at the transitional St Albans Community Centre, 1049 Colombo Street for the public to come and meet the working party and discuss the project.

New Building Updates:
1. New Building | Background (Prior to 13th June 2024)
2. Working Party | Members, Role & 2023 Consultation Feedback
3. New Building | Timeline (From the 13th June 2024)
https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/new-building-updates/

‘Shirley Centre’ Post Earthquakes Map

Each pin is clickable and has more info/links, + & -, are in the bottom left hand corner, so you can zoom in/out.
Click on the square with arrow, in the top left hand corner, to show/hide map legend/layers

The ‘Shirley Centre’ Post Earthquakes Map includes info/layers* on:
1. Schools & Adult Community Education (ACE) Closures
2. Community Facilities Built Post Earthquakes (see Tables below)
3. Shirley Centre | Information Centre

* The other info/layers from the ‘Shirley Centre’ Community Overview Map are also included in this map.
The current view has these info/layers turned off.
Click on the ‘Square with Arrow’, in the top left hand corner, to show/hide info/layers.


LGOIMA Request | 1523989 | Christchurch City Council
Community Facilities Built Post Earthquakes | 2012 – 2026

LGOIMA Request | 1523989 | Christchurch City Council
Community Facilities Built Post Earthquakes | 2012 – 2026

‘Shirley Centre’ Post Earthquakes Map info/layer details:
1. Schools & Adult Community Education (ACE) Closures
– Shirley Community Centre
– Shirley Boys’ High School
– Marian College
– Banks Avenue School
– Avonside Girls’ High School
– Hammersley Park School
– Richmond School
– St Paul’s School
– Floyds Creative Arts Centre
2. Community Facilities Built Post Earthquakes
– Aranui Library
– Graham Condon Recreation and Sport Centre
– Norman Kirk Memorial Pool
– Te Hāpua Halswell Centre
– Aranui Community Centre
– Heathcote Community Centre
– Governors Bay Community Centre
– Ōrauwhata Bishopdale Library & Community Centre
– Redcliffs Village Library
– St Martins Volunteer Library
– Matuku Takotako Sumner Centre
– Taiora QEII Recreation and Sport Centre
– Woolston Community Library
– He Puna Taimoana Hot Pools
– Manuka Cottage
– Opawa Volunteer Library
– Rārākau Riccarton Community Centre
– Kohinga St Albans Community Centre
– Te Pou Toetoe Linwood Pool
– Matatiki Hornby Centre
– Lancaster Park Community Centre
– Ōmōkihi South Library and Customer Service Hub
3. Shirley Centre | Information Centre
– Sutton Heritage House & Garden
– City to Sea Pathway
– Medway Footbridge
– Dallington Bridge
– Snell Place Footbridge
– Avondale Footbridge
– Dallington Landing
– Sector 7 Events
– Avon Park
– Kerrs Reach
– Wainoni Landing
– Climate Action Campus
– Riverlution Eco Hub
– Rehua Marae
– Nga Hau E Wha National Marae

Shirley Community Facility Plan v2

1. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Agenda for 11th December 2025
2. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes for 11th December 2025
3. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes Attachments for 11th September 2025
(No Attachments were included, even though the Board received emails).
4. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
YouTube Video of the 11th December 2025 Board Meeting
(No Deputations were allowed for this Item).
5. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Written Submission by Joanna Gould
(including AI Summary of .pdf)


1. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Agenda for 11th December 2025

https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/12/PCBCC_20251211_AGN_10741_AT.PDF
9. Updated Shirley Community Facility Design
– Pages 13-24: Council Staff Report
– Pages 25-31: Co-Studio Architects Developed Design for the Shirley Community Facility v2
– Pages 32-38: Co-Studio Architects Developed Design for the Shirley Community Facility v1.


2. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes for 11th December 2025

https://christchurch.infocouncil.biz/Open/2025/12/PCBCC_20251211_MIN_10741_AT.PDF
Pages 4-6
9. Updated Shirley Community Facility Design
– Community Board Consideration
The Board accepted the Officer Recommendations, except in respect of it selecting the option of having a raked ceiling for the facility, rather than a flat ceiling.
The Board also added resolution 7 below to enable the two meeting rooms in the updated facility design to be accessed independently of the function space via external doors that it requested the identified windows be replaced with.
The Board’s consideration confirmed that the authority given to staff to amend the updated design included determining whether the added doors be single or double.
Victoria Henstock foreshadowed moving the Officer Recommendations without change, but the addition of a raked ceiling, and external doors for the meeting rooms, was carried before the foreshadowed motion could be put to a vote.
– Officer Recommendations Ngā Tūtohu
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Updated Shirley Community Facility Design Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Approves the updated developed detail design, including a flat ceiling and associated project costings, incorporating the Board’s September 2025 directions, as shown in Attachment A to this report.
4. Instructs staff to proceed to tender and procurement following approval of the updated design and project costings.
5. Acknowledges the mahi of the Shirley Working Group and thanks them for their contribution to the project.
6. Notes that the total project remains deliverable within the Long-Term Plan budget of $3,705,000.
– Community Board Resolved PCBCC/2025/00074
Part C
That the Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board:
1. Receives the information in the Updated Shirley Community Facility Design Report.
2. Notes that the decision in this report is assessed as low significance based on the Christchurch City Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Subject to resolution 7, approves the updated developed detail design, including a raked ceiling and associated project costings, incorporating the Board’s September 2025 directions, as shown in Attachment A to the report.
4. Instructs staff to proceed to tender and procurement following approval of the updated design and project costings.
5. Acknowledges the mahi of the Shirley Working Group and thanks them for their contribution to the project.
6. Notes that the total project remains deliverable within the Long-Term Plan budget of $3,705,000.
7. Requests and authorises staff to amend the updated design by replacing:
a. the external window in Meeting Room 04; and
b. the south-western external window in Large Meeting Room 03;
with external glass doors of the same style as the other external doors in the facility, to enable those rooms to be accessed independently of the function space.
– Pauline Cotter/Jake McLellan Carried
9. Updated Shirley Community Facility Design Voting:
– For (6): Pauline Cotter, Jake McLellan, Dr Sunita Gautam, John Miller, Mike Davidson, Simon Britten
– Against (1): Emma Twaddell
– Abstain (2): Ashleigh Feary, Victoria Henstock
TOTAL = 9


3. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
Meeting Minutes Attachments for 11th September 2025

(No Attachments were included, even though the Board received emails).


4. Waipapa Papanui-Innes-Central Community Board
YouTube Video of the 11th December 2025 Board Meeting
(No Deputations were allowed for this Item).
Presentation & Board Discussions for Item 9. Updated Shirley Community Facility Design:
https://www.youtube.com/live/RRceb032Avw?t=5691s


5. ‘Shirley Community Facility’ Written Submission by Joanna Gould
.pdf: https://www.10shirleyroad.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/WaipapaPICItem9ShirleyCommunityFacilityDec2025JoannaGould.pdf
Includes information on the following topics:
– Shirley Community Facility | Developed Design | December 2025
– Proposed Shirley Community Facility | Feedback from September 2025
– Dudley Character Area, Richmond | Dudley Design Guide
– 10 Shirley Road & Original Building | Connections
– St Albans Community Centre | Concept Plan & Consultation
– Lancaster Park Community Centre and Changing Rooms
– Department of Conservation Email | Reserve Classification & Uses
– Shirley Community Reserve | Redevelopment Concept for Discussion
– CCC Community Facilities Network Plan | Principles
– CCC Community Facilities Network Plan | Best Practice Community Facility Design
– Christchurch City Council District Plan | Housing Intensification & Property Values
– Kāinga Ora | New Social Housing Developments
– Bookable Spaces & Local Activities Provided
– Shirley Centre | Ideas by Joanna Gould (2021)

AI Summary of .pdf:
“The document outlines concerns, feedback, and suggestions regarding the proposed Shirley Community Facility redevelopment at Shirley Community Reserve, as well as comparisons to other community projects and guidelines. Below are the key points:

Concerns with the Proposed Shirley Community Facility Design (December 2025)
Building Placement:
Located at the back of the reserve, hidden from Shirley Road, and not aligned with the existing path. ​
South wall blocks the line of sight from Shirley Road to Dudley Creek, raising CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) concerns. ​
Design Issues:
Meeting rooms are fixed spaces, not adjustable. ​
Access to meeting rooms is through the function space, which may limit usability. ​
The projector wall removes windows on the east side, blocking visibility to the playground and Shirley Playcentre. ​
The building lacks windows or doors on the south side, missing the best view of Dudley Creek. ​
Roof pitch, entrance location, and window styles do not align with the Dudley Design Guide for the area.
Interior Design:
The new building is a single-room facility, unlike the former multi-room community center. ​
No clarity on whether items from the former heritage-listed building will be incorporated.
Car Park and Paths:
Reduced car park spaces may impact Shirley Primary School and Shirley Playcentre. ​
The new car park is disconnected from existing paths, affecting accessibility. ​
The building is not connected to Shirley Road, the playground, or Shirley Playcentre.
Toilets and Kitchen:
Lack of windows in toilets and kitchen increases electricity and ventilation costs. ​
Concerns about vandalism and maintenance of public toilets. ​

Feedback and Advocacy:
The facility was designed without sufficient resident input and is deemed not “fit for purpose.” ​
Residents prefer a community-focused facility rather than a venue for hire or clubroom. ​
The facility should honor the area’s history and provide inclusive spaces for current and future residents. ​

Reserve Classification and Legal Implications:
The land is classified as a “Local Purpose Reserve” for a community center, which limits its use to this purpose unless the classification is changed. ​
Mixed-use activities are permissible if compatible with the reserve’s primary purpose. ​

Comparisons to Other Community Projects:
The St Albans Community Centre involved extensive public consultation and a community-led design process, which was not followed for the Shirley Community Facility.
Lancaster Park Community Centre has a larger building size and more amenities compared to the proposed Shirley Community Facility. ​

Recommendations:
Align the design with the CCC Community Facilities Network Plan principles, emphasizing community-led design, inclusivity, flexibility, and integration with surroundings. ​
Incorporate local history and retrieved items from the former heritage-listed building. ​
Improve accessibility and connectivity to surrounding paths, playgrounds, and public transport. ​
Address concerns about the building’s placement, design, and usability. ​

Additional Context:
The Shirley Community Reserve has been underutilized since the original community center was demolished in 2012 due to earthquake damage. ​
The area is experiencing housing intensification, with new social housing developments expected to bring approximately 198 new residents by May 2026. ​
The document includes links to resources, community groups, and design guidelines for further reference. ​

Conclusion:
The document emphasizes the need for a community-led, inclusive, and functional design for the Shirley Community Facility that aligns with the reserve’s purpose and addresses residents’ needs.
It highlights the importance of integrating the facility with its surroundings and honoring the area’s history while accommodating future growth.”